US, Turkey Faulted for Failure of Protocols

Armenia and Turkey sign the doomed Protocols in 2009

YEREVAN (RFE/RL)—The United States deserves its share of the blame for the failure of recent years’ efforts to normalize Armenia’s relations with Turkey, according to a renowned U.S. scholar who has been actively involved in Turkish-Armenian dialogue in the past.

In an extensive monograph released by New York’s Columbia University on Friday, David Phillips says that the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama did not do enough to stop the Turkish government linking parliamentary ratification of the 2009 Turkish-Armenian normalization agreements with the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. He also calls for a U.S. “policy review” on Armenia-Turkey that would consider the possibility of officially recognizing the Armenian Gencoide.

David Phillips

“The United States is also at fault. The Obama administration missed an opportunity to reaffirm de-linkage of the Protocols with negotiations over NK (Nagorno-Karabakh) when Obama visited Turkey in April 2009,” Phillips writes. “U.S. officials did not accurately assess the level of opposition to ratification in Turkey.”

“While U.S. influence was essential to signing of the Protocols, the Obama administration bureaucratized the follow-up. It should have appointed a ‘Special Envoy for Ratification of the Turkey-Armenia Protocols.’ The Special Envoy could have played a useful role in maintaining momentum, working the system in Washington, and keeping the parties focused on next steps rather than pre-conditions,” he says.

The 130-page text contains a detailed description and analysis of the failed normalization process as well as events leading up to its effective launch by Switzerland in late 2007, several months before Serzh Sarkisian took over as Armenia’s president. Its author coordinated the work of the Turkish-Armenian Reconciliation Commission (TARC), a U.S.-sponsored panel of retired diplomats and other public figures, in 2001-2004.

The Swiss mediation, fully backed and facilitated by Washington, culminated in the high-profile signing in Zurich in October 2009 of the two protocols that commit Ankara and Yerevan to establishing diplomatic relations and opening the Turkish-Armenian border. Turkey had closed it at the height of the Armenian-Azerbaijani war for Karabakh, out of solidarity with Azerbaijan.

Faced with an uproar from Azerbaijan, Ankara subsequently made clear that Turkey’s parliament will not ratify the protocols until there is decisive progress towards a resolution of the Karabakh conflict acceptable to Baku. The Armenian side denounced that stance, arguing that neither document makes any reference to Karabakh. Sarkisian froze the process of Armenian protocol ratification in April 2010 and has since repeatedly threatened to scrap the Western-backed deal altogether.

Phillips, who is now a program director at Columbia University’s Institute for the Study of Human Rights, essentially agrees with Yerevan on the issue. “The Protocols included no pre-conditions or linkage to NK,” he writes. “[Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip] Erdogan, however, established a pre-condition when he went to Baku [in 2009] and stated that the Protocols would not be ratified unless Azerbaijan’s sovereignty was restored.” Erdogan could have ignored the vehement Azerbaijani protests had he been “truly committed” to the Turkish-Armenian normalization, says Phillips.

Turkish officials have claimed all along that the protocols make indirect and implicit references to Karabakh. An unnamed Turkish Foreign Ministry official interviewed by Phillips is quoted in the monograph as saying that there was a “gentleman’s agreement” between Ankara and Yerevan that bilateral ties and the Karabakh dispute “will be considered in parallel.” James Jeffrey, the former U.S. ambassador to Turkey, likewise told Phillips that the two issues were not quite delinked.

“According to Jeffrey, Obama did not discuss de-linkage with [President Abdullah] Gul or Erdogan during his April [2009] trip. Instead of affirming de-linkage, Obama was silent on the issue,” says Phillips. He cites other U.S. diplomats as saying that Washington had a “plan B” in case the Turks refused to unconditionally implement the protocols. But, he adds, “no fallback plan was apparent other than convincing Sarkisian to suspend rather than withdraw his signature.”

Incidentally, Phillips called for stronger U.S. pressure on Ankara when he visited Yerevan in February 2010. “Unless the Obama administration presses the Turks at the highest level, the likelihood of the protocols being ratified in Ankara will decrease,” he told RFE/RL’s Armenian service (Azatutyun.am) at the time.

In his monograph, Phillips criticizes Armenia for agreeing to announce, in a joint statement with Turkey, a “roadmap” to the normalization on April 22, 2009, two days before the annual remembrance of the Armenian genocide victims. An unnamed senior Armenian official is quoted as confirming that this was done to make it easier for Obama to backtrack on his campaign pledge to recognize the genocide once elected president.

“Washington wanted us to announce the agreement before Genocide day so President Obama wouldn’t have to mention genocide in his statement,” the official told Phillips. “The Turks expected us to say ‘no,’ but we fooled them.”

The Armenian Revolutionary Federation pulled out of Sarkisian’s coalition government just days after the Turkish-Armenian statement.

“The timing of the announcement galvanized opposition among a broad cross-section of Armenian society, which believed that the Protocols would be manipulated by Ankara to undermine genocide recognition,” argues Phillips. He also faults Yerevan for agreeing to disclose the Turkish-Armenian protocols only four months after they were secretly finalized in April 2009.

Like many other pundits, Phillips believes that the protocols can hardly be revived “in their present form.” Still, he says the Turkish-Armenian border can be reopened even without their entry into force. “Erdogan can make history by issuing an executive order to open the border and normalize travel and trade as a step toward diplomatic relations,” he says.

Phillips also makes a case for continued U.S. financing of direct contacts between the civil societies and business communities of the two estranged nations. He goes on to urge the Obama administration to rethink its policy on Turkish-Armenian relations and consider “innovative ideas” suggested by U.S. and other experts. “The discussion could consider whether U.S. reaffirmation of its genocide recognition [proclaimed by President Ronald Reagan in 1981] would remove recognition as a bargaining chip, thereby creating conditions more conducive to reconciliation,” he says.

The monograph reaffirms Phillips’s view that a landmark study commissioned by the TARC from the New York-based International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) could serve as a blueprint for ultimate Turkish-Armenian reconciliation. The ICTJ concluded in 2003 that the Armenian massacres “include all of the elements of the crime of genocide” as defined by a 1948 United Nations convention. But it also said that the Armenians can not use the convention for demanding material or other compensation from Turkey.

“In any event, [genocide] recognition should not be an item for negotiations,” concludes Phillips. “It should not be traded for political concessions. Not only does negotiating recognition dishonor past victims, but it also sends a signal to future perpetrators that they can act with impunity when great powers find it politically expedient.”

EDITOR’S NOTE: Asbarez obtained the 130-page Phillips monograph on Friday. Upon thorough review, it will present its perspective on the report.

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

16 Comments

  1. Viguen Krikoryan said:

    Armenians do not need this anti Armenian and pro Turkish protocols. Stop fooling the Armenians with your sweet lollypops.
    Long live free and independent Artsakh, long live Armenia, long live the true believers of justice. Armenians are waiting but will not be fooled anymore.

  2. Jack Kalpakian said:

    All fine and well Mr. Philips, but when a mighty state blockades a small weak neighbor whose population it murdered, all bets are off and Genocide will be used as a weapon. This is real life and if the survival of the remaining Armenians takes using the legacy against Turkey, so be it.

  3. zareh said:

    Nalbandian is thinking did Hillary deposit my check in a Geneva bank account. What if she didn’t. Hillary is thinking, stupid Nalbandian, I never told you I will deposit any checks in Geneva.
    The protocols were the biggest fiasco for Armenia. Luckily it was never ratified.
    Did someone say in the article that there was a gentleman’s agreement about having parallel negotiations between the protocols and the Kharabagh issue?

  4. MK said:

    These treacherous protocols are nothing but serving the interests of US,at the expense of Armenian national interest,the so called protocols should be thrown to the dustbin of history.

  5. danoog said:

    Yet again, spectacular proof that Team Obama/Clinton is either totally incompetent, or totally biased toward Turkey and Azerbaijan.

  6. Harutuyn said:

    We all know that the Turks were buying time when they signed the so called protocols and looks like they are running out of time since time is on our side and as long as we have strength will and hope a change is coming our way, Just like i said a change is coming our way and it will be recognised The Armenian Genocide.

  7. Berge Jololian said:

    David Phillips is a snake in the grass. He is not credible.

  8. Sylva-MD-Poetry said:

    Great Powers

    Who are the great powers
    They are failed powers
    No respect for human rights
    Only they sing and destroy poor minorities
    The owners of their land
    Who doesn’t have wealth…oil
    for them to give
    Called them powerless minorities
    Who could not fight against killers
    They didn’t possess guns
    But gave Arts…Music Instruments
    to let others enjoy their lives…
    That isn’t a wealth …
    Is money…oil
    Are those only the wealth that are killing others
    for them to prevail…!

    Sylva-MD-Poetry
    Written instantly

  9. Peter Megerdumian said:

    The greatest act of patriotism that Armenians could show is to stop buying Turkish products in Armenian stores and for Armenian storekeepers to stop importing Turkish products. Our Armenian brethren are shooting the Armenian cause in the foot by helping the Turkish economy. Furthermore Russian researchers have found that Turkish food products are contaminated with dangerous pesticides which are banned in Europe and have high risks of causing cancer, particularly breast cancer .

  10. Hrant K. said:

    Demanding Material and other Compensation is all about why Turkey is refusing to acknowledge the Fact of the Armenian Genocide’s Truthfulness. Let the Turks dream about a joint Historians’ Forum as much as they want. The fact is, by refusing the Recognition of the Armenian Genocide, Turkey is alienating itself from the European Union and the Entire International Community! Their aim is transforming the issue into a long debate and trying to
    create doubts through their lies and history tampering. No, might is not always right when it’s baseless and unjustifiably brutal!
    Justice and Truth will eventually rule and prevail at the end of the day, the Criminals’ Inheritors will inherit
    their Crimes’ Punishments, as a son or a grandson inherits his father’s and grandfather’s wealth and belongings!!!
    The Turks have not inherited our Lands and Sacred Landmarks! They have robbed them from us ,confiscated
    them and looted and pillaged what we owned for Centuries and Millenia continuously. If the Turks manage to get away with what they did a Century + 50 years ago, then the world with transfer into a place with a “Law of the Jungle” ruling.
    Afterwards the victims can’t be blamed, when they get 10folds more violent than their assailants, as a reaction!!!

  11. Alex Postallian said:

    I see two grinning snakes in this picture,davutugly,hiliary(for sale sign on her back) clinton.

  12. Arsu said:

    Basicly, What this guy is saying Turkey should do all the work but Armenians sit back and enjoy their dinner.I know you all wait for a miracle to send all the Turks to hell but Phillips and you guys get real and enjoy the California sun ha??

  13. Arsu said:

    Peter
    “”Furthermore Russian researchers have found that Turkish food products are contaminated with dangerous pesticides which are banned in Europe and have high risks of causing cancer, particularly breast cancer .””
    Is this the reason why the British supermarkets are full of Turkish products? Get real mate!!!

    • Grish Begian said:

      I guess those Turkish food products in European markets are intended mostly for Muslim population, Muslim Turks loves Turkish food stuff they cal them “halal delights”!! We should encourage them to eat more of these stuff, especially in Germany and France and UK!!

  14. AraK said:

    Thank God for Obama’s mistake! Actually he did a big favor to us, we never needed that bs and harmful protocols! They are considering us as suckers!

*

Top