Eurovision Contest Inflames Regional Rivalries

Eurovision

BY NANORE BARSOUMIAN
From The Armenian Weekly

Earlier this month Armenia announced that it would not participate in the Eurovision Song Contest scheduled to take in Baku from May 22 to 26. This is not the first time Armenia and Azerbaijan—and to a certain extent, Turkey—have clashed over the song competition. Armenia’s latest decision, however, elicited responses from Azerbaijani and Turkish officials. Turkey’s EU Minister Egeman Bagis, told journalists, “We would like Armenia to stay away not from Eurovision, but from Karabakh. I think they should revise their decision.”

Asked whether he knew of the appeal sent to the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) by Armenia to reconsider the location of the contest, Bagis said he was not aware of such a move, and added that Azerbaijan’s right to host the event could not be disputed. Azerbaijan’s Ell and Nikki came first in Eurovision 2011, earning Azerbaijan the right.

“Azerbaijan is already a respected factor in the international arena. It’s a member of the United Nations. This country respects international law and is directed to democracy. No country has [a] right to deny it,” added Bagis.

Eurovision in ‘dark place’
In a March 19 article titled “Eurovision: Light Entertainment in a Dark Place,” The Independent newspaper questioned the choice of Azerbaijan as a host country in light of Baku’s “abysmal” human rights record of the country, the “authoritarian measures” adopted by its rulers, and the “beautification” efforts that have led to the eviction of thousands of citizens in Baku. The article cited criticisms from the Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, and added that this year’s contest “could be the most controversial Eurovision since it was held in Franco’s fascist Spain.”

Azerbaijani officials have argued that their country is on the path to democracy, and that no opposition members or journalists are imprisoned as a means to suppress freedom of speech. “No one outlaws freedom of speech [in Azerbaijan],” said Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov. Yet, human rights organizations strongly dispute this assertion. When asked whether Armenia-Azerbaijan relations would suffer as a consequence of Armenia’s withdrawal from the contest, Mammadyarov criticized the “politicization” of the event. “The Eurovision Song Contest should not be politically exploited and especially not in this conflict,” he said to the German press.

Armenia explains decision
On March 7, Armenian Public Radio (ArmRadio) informed the EBU that Armenia would not be participating in the 2012 Eurovision Song Contest, explaining that “it would make no sense to send a participant to a country where they would be received as an enemy.”

APR went on to say that anti-Armenian statements made by Azeri officials, including a recent comment by President Ilham Aliyev, had created an atmosphere where one “cannot ensure equal conditions for all singers participating in Eurovision.”

Aliyev had posted the following on the presidential website: “Our main enemies are Armenians of the world and the hypocritical and corrupt politicians that they control… Members of some parliaments, certain political figures, etc. who live on the money of the Armenian lobby.”

The executive supervisor of the contest, Jon Ola Sand, expressed his disappointment on behalf of the EBU. “Despite the efforts of the EBU and the host broadcaster to ensure a smooth participation for the Armenian delegation in this year’s contest, circumstances beyond our control led to this unfortunate decision,” he said.

Anti-Armenian sentiments
The shooting of an Armenian soldier on the Azeribaijan-Armenia contact line in February had already brought a rise in tensions before the APR’s announcement. Armenian performers had also issued a statement calling for a boycott. “We refuse to appear in a country that is well-known for mass killings and massacres of Armenians, in a country where anti-Armenian sentiments have been elevated to the level of state policy,” read a statement signed by 22 musicians, including 3 past Eurovision contestants.

Anti-Armenian sentiments from the top-level are frequently highlighted in the media. One often-cited incident is the elevation of Ramil Safarov to the level of national hero. (In 2004, during the NATO Partnership for Peace program in Budapest, Hungary, Safarov, an Azerbaijani army officer, axed his Armenian counterpart to death.) In August 2011, during a speech marking Azerbaijan’s 20th anniversary of independence, the head of Azerbaijan’s Presidential Administration’s political analysis department Elnur Aslanov told over 400 youth, “The victory in Eurovision Song Contest, wins of Azerbaijani athletes and the fact that sons of Azerbaijan like Mubariz Ibrahimov and Ramil Safarov did not kneel down before the enemy give special spirit to Azerbaijani youth.”

Conflict spillover
Despite Azerbaijan’s expressed distaste for mixing politics with a kitschy music competition, a much different tune was heard from the oil-rich republic as recently as in 2009. That year, Azerbaijani authorities tracked and interrogated dozens of citizens who had dared to vote for Armenia’s entry, the Inga and Anush Arshakyan sisters. Called to police stations, 43 citizens had to justify their vote and affirm their allegiance to their country. Also that year, the EBU found that the Azerbaijani broadcaster Ictimai Televiziya had intentionally distorted the TV signal to blur out the telephone number during Armenia’s performance. Similarly, during the 2010 Junior Eurovision, Baku authorities were accused of taking the live broadcast off air when it became clear that Armenian Vladimir Arzumanyan would win.

In 2010, when then 22-year-old Eva Rivas sang “Apricot Stone” during the national selection process, a Turkish composer claimed the song’s first seven lines had a political message—that it was about the Armenian Genocide, and that “motherland” referred to lands under Turkish control. The story appeared in numerous Turkish and Azerbaijani newspapers, such as the Anadolu Ajansi (Anatolian News Agency), the Azeri Press Agency, CNN Turk, and Radikal. Rivas and her producer said the lyrics in question—“Many, many years ago / when I was a little child / mama told me you should know / our world is cruel and wild / but to make your way / through cold and heat / love is all that you need…”—were about love and peace, and about the diaspora yearning for the homeland.

Eurovision bans songs that have a clear political message. In 2009, Georgia’s representatives were instructed to change the words to “We Don’t Wanna Put In” which, they believed, took a jab at Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. Georgia, in turn, withdrew from the contest, which was held in Moscow.

Last year, Azerbaijani newspapers accused Armenia of stealing the “Azerbaijani national dance,” the kochari, when it was featured in Emmy’s performance. In 2009, the media attacked the Inga and Anush sisters for “stealing” an Azerbaijani song titled “Nakhichevan.”

Armenia has also used the song contest as a platform to highlight its position, irritating Azerbaijan. For instance, in 2009 an introductory video that aired before Armenia’s semi-final performance showed the “We Are Our Mountains” monument located in Karabakh. Infuriated, Azerbaijani representatives complained to EBU officials, and the scene was deleted from the video. Armenia did not give in easily, however. As Sirusho, Armenia’s 2008 contestant, read Armenia’s 2009 votes, she repeatedly flashed a large image of the monument—taped to the back of her clipboard—as another screen shot of the controversial monument was displayed brightly behind her.

This most recent decision is not the first instance of Armenian competitors refusing to travel to Azerbaijan. About a month ago, 29-year-old Grandmaster Levon Aronian, one of two top chess players in the world, notified the World Chess Federation (FIDE) that he would not compete in the Candidates Tournament for the World Championship if Azerbaijan were to host the games. Aronian said that being in a hostile atmosphere would have an adverse effect on his mental capabilities, and would rob him of his “peace of mind.” In a Feb. 2 letter, he wrote, “No circumstances, if they are not chess-related, should prevent the grandmaster from demonstrating all of his skills. Unfortunately, at this moment no Armenian can find [a] favorable or adequate psychological atmosphere in Azerbaijan, whereas that is something absolutely necessary. In my opinion, all the participants should be in equal conditions, which is impossible in case of holding the tournament in Azerbaijan. Security guaranties and any kind of additional support cannot be a remedy.”

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

8 Comments

  1. Alex Postallian said:

    At one time,I felt sorry for the turk citizenship,not anymore;They seem to relish the animal behavior of their people in charge.For example apeman bigass,making such real stupid(three steps below a cretin) statements about azarbajohn(,toilet in America), and ARMENIA.I can see why there hasnt been any dialogue between them.I came to the conclusion,thet the goobles,goobles,are smoking the opium pipe too long,or brain dead.

    • hayko yesilkoyluian said:

      if there are brainless people they are westerner who is visits where turks lives including central asian turkic countries why americans germans frenchs english open factories why every year one million american visits there or french If we can not block that we nothing to do.

      • hayko yesilkoyluian said:

        and radical fetullah gulen resident in usa he has alot of school over the world what armenian-american doing against him and his supporters ? nothing If we cant finish him there usa we are nothing in another countries.I am as a turkish citizen armenian I hope I will move another country soon and never come back armenians invated istanbul after conqueror of constantinepole by mehmet II for work as a slave in handwork turks still see as slave in here and some brainless bolshoshayks change their names and surnames for sell more kg gold its shameless I dont want to see like that anything diaspora armenians never cant estimate how living in istanbul that mean living 15 million enemy no safety no right no freedom typical ottoman mentality still on them of course we cant kill all turks and kurds and cant change their ideas just can block like as a north korea.

  2. haybaxt said:

    So what’s the message you are trying to send across. Nicely written, but hard to see where are you going with this.

  3. hayko yesilkoyluian said:

    eurovision not very important event we should look diplomatic ways

  4. Arto said:

    Instead of boycotting, the RA government should have put maximum resources and won the competition. Now that would have shown the world something and really pissed off the Tatars.

  5. Eduard said:

    this is a good decision, but It is not enough. Armenia has not enough aggressive media. such a decision should find allies. The image of the Turks is polished by the dollars every year, Armenia must address all countries, inform them, official and also their media, public, why they should do the same.
    Seems we are sleeping, and this have seen since many years. The mass Marketing of Azeri works 100 times better, and by using the Moto “attack is the best defense, even in Media, News. Modesty is nice for the church.

*

Top