European Cows Can’t Stand Poor Living Conditions in Azerbaijan


Harut Sassounian

BY HARUT SASSOUNIAN

In keeping with the holiday spirit, my last column of the year is devoted to a light-hearted topic!

In a story titled: “Imported Cattle no Bovine Boon for Azerbaijan,” Seadet Akifqizi of the Azerbaijani Service of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) reported that the government of Azerbaijan spent $23 million to import “4,500 pedigree cows from Germany and Austria in an effort to improve livestock quality and boost milk production.” Each European cow was expected to produce 40 liters (10.5 gallons) of milk a day compared to the domestic Azeri cow that yielded only 9 liters (2.4 gallons), Akifqizi wrote.

Unfortunately, the project was a failure and the invested funds were wasted. Many of the high-class European cows could not survive the miserable living conditions in Azerbaijan!

Baku officials blame farmers for “not caring properly for the imported cows, which apparently require a certain degree of pampering.” Azeri agricultural analyst Vahid Maharramov explains that the cattle brought from overseas “require high-quality feed and special hygiene.”

Farmers, on the other hand, complain that they cannot afford to extend such lavish care and attention to the foreign cows, because “it is not cost effective and would lead to a steep increase in the price of milk.”

Farmer Tarbiya Yusifova is unhappy that her major investment in imported cows did not pay off: “The price of the milk we produce is expensive for most customers because the hay we buy for the cattle is very expensive.”

This is how the government’s ‘lease a cow’ program works: Farmers pay half the price of the cows when leasing them from the state-controlled firm Agrolizinq. The balance is to be paid in three years. Farmers must “have their own sowing area and adhere to strict guidelines for their barns,” Akifqizi explained. “The humidity and lighting needs to be just right, and their diets and hygienic conditions should remind the European cattle of home.”

However, conditions in Azerbaijan are far from ideal for the imported cows. When the RFE/RL reporter visited Firudin Hasanov’s farm in the Qushchu village, she learned that the farmer had to send most of his 30 pedigree cows to relatives in the Baku area because he was unable to provide the proper living conditions for them.

Akifqizi describes Hasanov’s farm as “a squalid barn that looks like it hasn’t been cleaned for months. It is littered with manure, spiders climb the walls, and flies buzz around the feed containers.” Hasanov explained that he “couldn’t afford to upgrade his barns because in the countryside he can’t sell his milk” at a price that would cover his costs.
To make matters worse, farmers have to pay Agrolizinq the full amount of the lease, even if the cows die prematurely. RFE/RL reports that “at least 260 of the imported cows have died since 2009, equal to around $1.3 million in losses.” It is not known how many of these cows committed suicide because they could not stand living in such unbearable conditions!
The story takes a more serious turn when the RFE/RL reporter raises serious questions about the price of the European cows and the identity of the companies that imported them.

Agricultural analyst Maharramov notes that “the prices Azerbaijani farmers are being asked to pay for the pedigree cows is significantly higher than in other countries.” RFE/RL revealed that “pedigree cattle imported from Austria cost $5,000 per head, as opposed to around $3,000 in Turkey.”

According to Agrolizinq, three little-known companies had won the tenders to import European cows to Azerbaijan: Rista Alliance, Ninox Alliance, and Swisspoint Merchants Limited, which was registered in New Zealand from 2009 until 2011. “The website of the New Zealand commercial registry says the firm was directed by a Latvian citizen named Inta Bilder,” RFE/RL discovered. A search of the registry identified “Bilder as the director or shareholder of hundreds of companies. Earlier this year, the Ukrainian newspaper ‘Dzerkalo Tyzhnia’ reported that one of those companies, Falcona Systems, was linked to an alleged fraud worth more than $150 million involving state-owned companies.”
Maharramov is suspicious. He told RFE/RL: “Considering that the government directs budget resources [to buy cattle from abroad] hastily and without any preparation, you can suspect that there were some other intentions in this.”

Maharramov should be very cautious when talking about imported animals. In 2009, Azeri blogger Emin Milli was jailed for reporting that the government of Azerbaijan had paid exorbitant prices for imported donkeys!

7 Responses

for “European Cows Can’t Stand Poor Living Conditions in Azerbaijan”

  1. basil says:

    “In 2009, Azeri blogger Emin Milli was jailed for reporting that the government of Azerbaijan had paid exorbitant prices for imported donkeys”

    I know its a cheap shot, but… if there is one thing you don’t need to import, then it is donkeys to Azerbaijan.

  2. proudtobehay says:

    who cares, man. living conditions are bad both in armenia and azerbaijan. both for people and animals. in yerevan there are many stray dogs. these dogs must be given a home and food. also, meat eating is bad for health and soul. all people should go vegetarian. in armenia’s case that would be good for the economy too since meat is expensive.

    our problem with azerbaijan is not their cows but their plans to exterminate us.

  3. Edward Demian says:

    Nothing wrong with the idea. Wrong choice of cow breed. Armenia, Azerbaidjian, and all Caucassus, needs a hardy breed of bovine; such as the Stottish highland cattle. These cows spend the night outside in the cold of winter, forage for food on their own under the snow, birth alone without complications, and are very people friendly. Such a breed is more suited for the Caucassus environment , than those lowland Dutch cows that are like milk factories. However, they are hybrid breeds, very dainty, genetically very weak, that require antiseptic environments, expert care, plus specialized feed.

  4. Satenik says:

    Thank you for yet another interesting article. Happy Christmas to you and to all Asbarez readers!

  5. Dino says:

    Armenian farmers are just as bad. Both sides have generation after generation of horrible farmers. Even providing information about more effective farming techniques, which don’t cost a dime to implement, are ignored because it’s too much added work. They would prefer sick and inefficient animals and dream about the next batch of ooghi from their grossly underproducing and sickly grapes. Food production is a national security issue. Armenia has only a 100 day supply of food. I guess during the next war, Armenian villager farmers will be doing what they did in 1918-20, selling their daughters to their heathen-barbarian neighbors for a couple of poods of wheat. Oops, I forgot, they do that right now, Armenian women and girls, the top export from Armenian farming villages.

  6. Masis Babajanian says:

    Let Aliyev beware that all the weapons he is acquiring will encounter the same fate. Resources of any type without the proper intelligence and know how are useless. How can he expect to ensure the safety and well-being of Armenians in Karabakh when he can’t even provide basic sustenance for cows? Perhaps the axe murderer will use his skills and new rank in the military to slaughter all the imported cows–it would be a new program called “The Underproducers at the Safarov Ranch.”

  7. Vazken says:

    Gazerbaijan don’t need cows, junior sultan aliyev is milking his people dry.

Leave a Reply