Are We Fracked

Garen Yegparian

BY GAREN YEGPARIAN

A shiver ran down my spine when I saw the news item “US Geological Survey Completes Armenia Shale Gas Resources Study”.

“Why?” you’re probably almost shouting out loud. “This will give our country more flexibility, make it less reliant on external energy sources, bring down prices, and render the Turco-Azeri blockades less relevant!” you’re exclaiming as you wonder if I’ve taken leave of my sanity.

At least, those are the kinds of seemingly wonderful results we’ll be promised by those who are probably salivating over the prospect of tapping those shale gas deposits.

But getting to those reserves requires a process called hydraulic fracturing, or more commonly, fracking. Water, chemicals , other material is injected deep underground, under very high pressure, into the shale formation to break up the solid rock that is trapping the gas, which is then free to flow up the wells that are drilled into those layers of rock.

According to an obviously pro-fracking, I’d guess fossil fuel industry built, website, “Shale gas is natural gas trapped in hard dense deposits of shale formed from ancient sea basins millions of years ago.”

So far so good. But then, in their “FAQ” section we see:
* “Is the groundwater safe?”
* “Yes, each well has layers of cement and steel casing to prevent groundwater leaks.
* Most wells are monitored with state of the art equipment”; and
* “Does fracking cause earthquakes?”
* “An incredibly small amount of seismic activity accompanies the hydraulic fracturing process; however the low level of seismicity has resulted in no cases of injury or property damage in over one million instances.”

Why, you might wonder, are water and earthquake safety being addressed? It’s because it really is NOT known whether this is safe. The California legislature is, even now, wrestling with whether or not to allow fracking in the state and under what regulations. No one knows what impact messing with these types of geological formations in seismically active areas such as California, or Armenia, will be. And all that “cement and steel casing” is in the well system itself. It’s not clear that once broken up, fluids that had been immobilized by the previously intact shale won’t travel and get mixed up with underground water supplies. Perhaps the most jarring and potent example of this is the flammable water coming out of people’s taps. This happens in farming areas where wells supply the water. After fracking begins in an area, the water coming out of the kitchen taps becomes flammable, at the touch of lit simple match.

On the non-technical front, we should also be concerned that this will be yet another natural resource for some unscrupulous oligarch to exploit and enrich himself with, at our homeland dwelling compatriots’ expense.

So let’s stop this train, dead in its tracks, before it becomes a wreck that wreaks more havoc on the tiny land mass of the Republic of Armenia.

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

4 Comments

  1. Perouz said:

    Garen; This is the best explanation of “fracking” that I have ever read. It has raised controversy in other countries where it is being done. You gave the very best reason for it not to be done in Armenia when you wrote: “On the non-technical front, we should also be concerned that this will be yet another natural resource for some unscrupulous oligarch to exploit and enrich himself with, at our homeland dwelling compatriots’ expense.”
    Right on, Garen

  2. Vartan said:

    How do we “stop this train dead in its tracks”? I for one am not a citizen of Armenia and have no voting rights or voice. What do you propose? Who will fund fracking projects in Armenia, U.S. oil companies? Will the U.S. government fund such projects, in which case I would have a (small) voice to write my Congressman and Senators?

  3. Arman said:

    Armenia needs this oil for its strategic defense reserves. The military equipment Armenia has runs either on diesel or gasoline, and in case of “challenges to Armenia’s security,” the country will need fuel which is not conditioned on arriving from Georgia or Iran. If the Armenian Government is wise, they will secure a long term, strategic fuel reserve for the nation, and thus, contribute to the overall military, economic, and political strength of Armenia.
    I understand that there are environmental concerns. I don’t understand why those are the only concerns people have, and don’t see the other side of the issue, that these shale oil reserves are a major card in Armenia’s sleeve. Hopefully, by the time Azerbaijan has run out of oil, Armenia will have its millions of tons of shale oil ready to be used. This oil is a good insurance policy to have. Has anyone forgotten that both Turkey and Azerbaijan have placed Armenia under two blockades: one a transport blockade, the second an energy blockade. For those who don’t know, if a state blockades a neighboring country, under international law this is considered an act of war. Look at how many naval blockades have taken place in history. The North blockading the South during the US Civil War is one example. The US blockading Cuba during the Missile Crisis is another.
    I hope Armenia’s President (who is said to be a chess fanatic) can see that these shale oil reserves are a great opening for Armenia to escape the CHECK blockade Turkey and Azerbaijan have cornered Armenia under. Mr. Sargsyan, open your eyes before CHECK becomes CHECK MATE.

*

Top