What Does the New Global Forest Watch Website Say About Armenia?

The new Global Forest Watch website shines a spotlight on global tree loss (screengrab from www.globalforestwatch.org)


BY JASON SOHIGIAN

Last month’s launch of the Global Forest Watch website was big news. Google, World Resources Institute, and a few dozen other partners are part of the effort. The site allows users to monitor deforestation in “near real time.” The big takeaway: global tree cover loss far exceeds tree cover gain. Data shows that the world lost 2,300,000 square kilometers of tree cover between 2000 and 2012, or the equivalent of losing 50 soccer fields’ worth of forests every minute of every day for the past 13 years. By contrast, only 800,000 square kilometers have regrown, been planted, or restored during the same period.

We welcome initiatives like GFW, which use cutting edge technology to make forestry data available to the public. This kind of transparency is essential to shine a spotlight on forest loss and to show areas where natural regeneration or reforestation has been successful. This information empowers citizens and is even valued by corporations that want to use sustainably harvested wood.

Now, what does the site show for Armenia? GFW shows that there was forest loss in Armenia over an area of 2,089 hectares and a gain of 1,276 over the period of 2000 to 2011. It’s interesting to note that the data relies on Landsat satellite imagery which has become an accepted source to measure forest cover globally. According to this data, Armenia has seen a loss of approximately 813 hectares of forest over this 12 year timeframe. For reference, a hectare is 2.47 acres or an area the size of a soccer field.

Armenia Tree Project has been planting in urban areas and towns since 1994 and launched its forestry program in 2004. ATP has planted a total of 4,455,869 trees to date at more than 925 sites in all regions of Armenia. Most of our forestry has been focused around 30 sites in Northern Armenia. Our forestry department has planted approximately 3,500,000 tree seedlings over an area of 850 hectares.

However, our seedlings have not even formed into forests with a canopy that would be recognized by satellite data at this resolution. There is no question we are losing forest cover and ATP is trying to turn the tide along with other partners. It’s also worth noting that Armenia’s Hayantar forestry department has been planting during this timeframe.

A new tree seedling sprouting up at a site planted by ATP in Northern Armenia (Photo by Jason Sohigian)


There have been other efforts to monitor forest cover in Armenia and the general conclusion was that that there has been a net gain in forest cover, consistent with what we have seen in other parts of Europe. However some experts in the environmental community have pointed out that the regrowth of forest has been a lower quality “coppice” tree which is almost like a shrub that has grown out of tree stumps. Setting the statistics aside, there is a consensus that Armenia needs to curb forest loss and that reforestation should be accelerated in order to restore our historic tree cover.

Some of the drivers of forest loss have been industrial logging, unsustainable livestock grazing, and the use of wood for cooking and heating fuel. Of course we recognize that people in rural areas rely on wood. At the same time forests are a renewable resource when they are sustainably managed and not overexploited. In addition to planting there are other strategies that may be deployed in order to reduce the pressure on forests. These include subsidizing the cost of natural gas for households, enforcing a ban on wood exports, and reducing tax on imported wood.

In general, we are in favor of initiatives like GFW that make the information about our forests transparent and publicly accessible. In the end we hope this draws attention to the issue of deforestation in Armenia and globally, and that it shows the importance of investing resources in protecting and restoring this important part of our natural infrastructure.

Clearly there’s a lot left to be done in Armenia to reverse deforestation. One thing we know is that sustainable management of our natural resources like forests will be more cost-effective than depleting the reserves and trying to fund environmental restoration programs. Particularly when some environmental impacts–like desertification caused by deforestation–are irreversible.

Jason Sohigian is deputy director of the Armenia Tree Project. He has a master’s degree in Sustainability and Environmental Management from Harvard University. His research on Payments for Environmental Services was adapted for a talk at TEDx Yerevan on “Redefining Our Economic Systems.”

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

3 Comments

  1. adrine said:

    The answer is so simple and in front of our collective faces of a renewable source that not only enhances our planet ecologically, but, safely provides us with over 25,000 products that can safely be made from it while allowing the world to replant trees and allowing these trees to grow and not be cut down at such an alarming rate when matured. What is my answer? Hemp!!!!!!!!!!!!! Get over the lies (sood) about it, be strong, and be a leader instead of whining as worthless bureaucrats do. “Come out of it, my people.” If you can’t figure that out, you will be the next archeological dig.

  2. Antoine S. Terjanian said:

    Thank you Mr. Sohigian for being straight and showing some transparency about this impending catastrophe. Yes indeed:”there’s a lot left to be done in Armenia to reverse deforestation”, and I am glad that ATP started planting forestry species in some areas in 2004.
    I have personally organised such an effort, thanks to ATP (see the photos of school children who helped us reforest a steep hill in Yeghegnadzor http://www.flickr.com/photos/aterjanian/sets/72157600803338416/).
    I also like the measures you suggest:”subsidizing the cost of natural gas for households, enforcing a ban on wood exports, and reducing tax on imported wood”. But all the 3 measures you propose require a lot of funds. I would be interested to know if ATP has tried to figure-out the cost of such recommendations. As you know, the Government of Armenia had been ‘secretly’ subsidizing the price of gas for a few years and ended-up giving away their remaining shares in RUS/ARMGAZPROM to pay their debt. In the mean time, our external debt to International Orgs keeps increasing.
    I remember an effort we organised with ATP and the Armenian Forests NGO around Christmas 2002 to help reduce the cutting of trees to be used for Christmas decorations: After pressuring then Minister Ayvazyan to ban the sale of Christmas trees in Yerevan, we had a competition among schools and schoolchildren as to who would make the best “artificial Christmas tree”. This effort cost us peanuts and you can see the photos of some of the artificial tree creations and the prize award ceremony with Mr. Ayvazyan on: http://www.flickr.com/photos/aterjanian/sets/72157642392837883/

*

Top