Parliament Ratifies Eurasian Union Entry

The National Assembly ratified Armenia's accession to the Eurasian Union by a vote of 103 to 7. Dec. 4, 2014. (Photo: Photolur)


YEREVAN (RFE/RL)—Armenia’s National Assembly voted overwhelmingly on Thursday to ratify Armenia’s accession treaty with the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union, which President Serzh Sarkisian hopes will come into force next month.

The treaty signed by Sarkisian in October was backed by 103 members of the 131-seat Armenian parliament representing not only the ruling Republican Party (HHK) but virtually all opposition factions. Only 7 deputies voted against it, while another lawmaker abstained.

The vote followed three days of heated debates during which parliamentary opponents of Armenia’s membership in the EEU decried what they see as a grave threat to national independence. They included all three members of the opposition Zharangutyun party’s parliamentary faction and non-partisan opposition deputies like Alexander Arzumanian and Nikol Pashinian.

Vahram Baghdasarian, the HHK’s parliamentary leader, dismissed their concerns, saying that even Western powers have reacted “more calmly” to Sarkisian’s foreign policy choice. “There is no need to fret and worry,” he said in a concluding speech.

Baghdasarian also brushed aside arguments that the bloc comprising Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan holds no promise for Armenia especially now that the Russian economy is plunging into recession partly because of Western sanctions. He said that the Russian crisis will not be long-lasting.

Prime Minister Hovik Abrahamian, who was present at the parliament vote along with some cabinet members, likewise spoke of “good things” awaiting Armenia in the union. “That membership in the EEU will earn us benefits and that it will contribute to our economic development is a fact. You will see the results next year,” he told reporters after the vote.

Abrahamian noted at the same time that Armenia’s macroeconomic performance in 2015 will hinge on the gravity of “regional economic problems.” He appeared to allude to Russia’s economic woes.

The main opposition parties other than Zharangutyun cited different reasons for their decision to acquiesce Armenia’s accession to the EEU. “We are not voting for the steps taken by the authorities,” said Tigran Urikhanian of the Prosperous Armenia Party (BHK), the second largest parliamentary force. “They could and should have been better. We are voting for not damaging Armenia at this particular moment.”

Several members of the BHK’s 36-strong faction, including the party’s leader Gagik Tsarukian and former Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian, were conspicuously absent from the parliament or did not take part in the vote.

The much smaller faction of the opposition Armenian National Congress (HAK) backed the treaty while acknowledging risks emanating from EEU membership. “At any moment member states can decide to leave the union and complete that process within a year. Therefore, all talk of a loss of independence is purely emotional,” Levon Zurabian, the HAK’s parliamentary leader, told fellow lawmakers.

Zurabian claimed that President Sarkisian’s alleged lack of domestic legitimacy is more of a threat to Armenia’s sovereignty than Russia or the EEU. This is why, he said, Yerevan will be “obeying and executing orders, rather than raising issues and voicing demands” in the EEU after completing the accession process.

The Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutiun), another major opposition party, said joining the EEU is critical for Armenia’s national security. “We don’t just lack a better alternative. We have no alternative at all,” Dashnaktsutiun’s Armen Rustamian said, referring to the country’s close security ties to Russia.

Sarkisian unexpectedly decided last year to make Armenia part of the Russian-led alliance after years of negotiations with the European Union on a far-reaching Association Agreement. The EU abandoned the agreement following the volte face widely attributed to strong Russian pressure.

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

7 Comments

  1. Armenian said:

    Well, there’s goes Armenia.

    Pan-Turkists can finally rejoice as this marks the beginning of the end for us.

    • Random Armenian said:

      Yes, thank you mother Russia for fighting against the Artsakhtsis, on the side of the Azeris, during the struggle.

        • Avetis said:

          He means the Soviet Union. He is not intelligent enough to distinguish between two systems of government and their their separate geopolitical formulations.

          Until 1991 the Soviet Politburo was desperately trying to keep the Soviet Union intact. Once the Soviet Union collapsed, a new geopolitical reality emerged. After the collapse the newly created Russian nation came to its senses and realized that Russia’s security in the Caucasus starts with Armenia. Russian arms began pouring into Armenia soon after that. By 1993, the war was over.

  2. Harutik said:

    Finally, after twenty-five years of disastrous sociopolitical developments, I see some light at the end of the tunnel. I can now sleep better at nights knowing that Armenia’s future in a volatile place like the South Caucasus is secure. I pray for Pax Russicana.

  3. Hratch said:

    From the number of comments, and which my comment was deleted, there seems to be two others interested in this debate. Apparently, the world can revolve without Armenia and Armenians!

*

Top