Armenia Should Prevent Enforcement of PACE Resolution, Says ARF Parliamentary Leader

Armen Rustamyan, head of the parliamentary faction of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation Dashnaktsutyun (Source: Photolure)
Armen Rustamyan, head of the parliamentary faction of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation Dashnaktsutyun (Source: Photolure)

Armen Rustamyan, head of the parliamentary faction of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation Dashnaktsutyun (Source: Photolure)

YEREVAN (—In an interview with, Armen Rustamyan, head of the parliamentary faction of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation Dashnaktsutyun (ARF-D) and member of the Armenian delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), has said that Armenia must spare no effort to prevent the legal enforcement of a PACE report which both Armenia and Artsakh consider to be anti-Armenian.

The report, entitled, “Escalation of Violence in Nagorno-Karabakh and Other Occupied Territories of Azerbaijan,” by Robert Walter (United Kingdom, EC), a rapporteur of the PACE Political Affairs Committee, was accepted by the PACE Committee on Political Affairs earlier this month.

In July, Asbarez reported that Walter had received Turkish citizenship. Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu personally handed Walter his new Turkish ID card at the Turkish Embassy in London. Walter, who is married to a Turkish woman, reportedly expressed delight over his new dual citizenship, and is now accused of having business interests in Azerbaijan.

Mr. Rustamyan, the news media continues to discuss Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s visit to Armenia. What do you think was the purpose of his visit?

Mr. Lavrov’s visit should be considered natural. Our bilateral relations are at such a high level that such visits could be daily ones. So there is nothing extraordinary about the visit. There is an implication and rapidly changing situation. We know Russia is playing a major role in the Middle East developments, while Armenia is a country attaching high importance to the security of Armenian communities in different states. A number of issues related to Nagorno-Karabakh are on the agenda, which, I think, were discussed as well.

As a member of the Armenian delegation to PACE, what is your opinion of Sergey Lavrov’s critical assessment of the anti-Armenian report?

First of all, I should say that the report presented by the British rapporteur is a disgraceful document. There is no such precedent in PACE’s history—a biased document submitted to discussion of a plenary session, with accusations against one side and praises for the other. It is common knowledge that the principle of parity is normally applied to conflicts, but it should not be accompanied with praises of one of the conflicting parties and discredit of the other. In this respect, the statement by Azerbaijan’s Milli Majlis (National Assembly) was an overt interference in the OSCE Minsk Group’s activities. Claims are made that the OSCE Minsk Group should revise its approaches to the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process, doing so in Azerbaijan’s favor. How can it be? It creates a dangerous situation because Azerbaijan will try to use the document to interfere in the Minsk Group’s activities. In this context, Sergey Lavrov’s statement that they will not accept that external document is of high importance because he is not only the Russian foreign minister, but also a representative of an OSCE Minsk Group co-chairing country. Moreover, the document contains an accusation against Russia—it says that Russia must not sell arms to the conflicting parties. The [document] said that arms should never be sold to the conflicting parties, while Turkey is selling arms to Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan is purchasing arms from different states, and it is unfair to draw attention to Russia alone.

If PACE approves the report as a resolution, what consequences could it have? Could Azerbaijan make any use of this resolution if it does not have any legal force?

Yes, it does not have any legal force because PACE is not internationally mandated to deal with the problem. Moreover, PACE has no structures or institutional mechanisms to implement approved reports or resolutions. The only means is Azerbaijan using the report for propaganda, which could have unfavorable consequences.  If PACE approves the report, it will stop performing its function of arbiter, damage its reputation by siding with one of the conflicting parties, sponsoring its interests. We must do our utmost to prevent any legal enforcement of the document in terms of forcing Armenia into taking on commitments, and we are not going to take on more commitments beside those we have taken since we joined PACE. We took on certain commitments, including ones on Nagorno-Karabakh, before joining the PACE. If we had been told that we would join PACE only to cede Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijan, we would not have joined PACE. But now they are saying to us, “You joined PACE, so you must cede Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijan.”

Following Sergey Lavrov’s visit, Russian media did not rule out that the Russian Foreign Minister visited Armenia to persuade the Armenian side into returning Nagorno-Karabakh regions to Azerbaijan. Do you think such a scenario could be put into practice?

No. The OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs made five made major statements at this stage, which includes certain elements of the peace process. I do not think the developments will go beyond the platform in question. The ARF-D has certain reservations because we believe the status must be a top priority. The PACE resolution actually ruled out a possibility of settling the issue in the context of the five statements. It prioritizes territorial integrity, which is unacceptable to us. That is why we refused to vote on the document. The concept, “territories for status,” is distorted. It actually implies “status first,” “territories later.” But they changed the places, saying “territories first, and then we will discuss the status.” But it is an unfair solution, with violations of the international principle of conflict settlement.


Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.


  1. edward demian said:

    War is inevitable. There will never be peace while the Aliyev clan is in power. How does one person on a civil servants salary, (all be it that of a president), wind up with billions in assets in just twenty years. The Aliyev clan has to stay in power in order to sifon more and more money, and silence anyone bringing attention to it. The stealing will stop, only when the Aliyevs come close to falliing from grace, and than, he will order an all out assault on Artsackh and Armenia. How else is he going to justify the billions in missing money. “Puff, it went up in smoke fighting the Ermeni”. In a way, that is good for us, because skimming on such grand scale manifests itself in missing parts and supplies such as ammunition. So an all out assault by an army plagued with shortages in ammunition, spare parts, K rations etc. , its only half the assault. Also, the readers can be 100% sure as verified publicly by Armenia’s top General, that an all out assault will mean a retaliatory strike by Armenia against all Azery infrastructure, including the oil pipeline. I would not rule out us taking over the pipeline since it is in the way of a much desired corridor between Armenia and Russia. The Russians need it, The Armenians need it, We’ll be having annual marathons collecting money for the infrastructure needed for all those new territorries. just after we get done with tha Azery’s after the next war. We’ll give some of the liberated territorries to Georgia, those that are clearly culturaly Georgian, to placate the Varatzis. Iran will be happy of a much reduced bellicose Azerbaidjan, all but Turkey will indifferent. And the West? As long as the oil flows at the same price and dependable, they won’t see any reason to go to war with Russia over Armenia or Azerbaijan.

  2. edward demian said:

    What I don’t understand, is, why are we even considering negotiating wit an adversary that is clearly a dictatorship. This is not WW II where democratic Checkoslovakia was handed over to Nazi Germany. I believe that the world should first require regime change and Democratization in Azerbaijan before any more discussions can occur. In fact, Democratic Nagorno Karabagh, has a moral imperative to foment a revolution in Azerbaijan, by the various ethnic oppressed minorities to topple the dictatorship, and share the wealth equally, with civil rights for all, and compensation to all.

  3. Zareh Sahakian said:

    Wake up. Wake up!

    Armenian politicians have yet to understand that the most effective defence is a strong offence. Armenia waits…and reacts only after the fact. Armenia has been reacting to political situations, some of them very dangerous, instead of initiating offensive political manoeuvres to corner Azerbaijan.

    ….let’s not put the blame on Azeri petrodollars alone, please!