Azerbaijan’s Guns Must be Silenced: Can’t Negotiate under Fire

Harut Sassounian


Harut Sassounian

Harut Sassounian


For over two decades, the international community, led by OSCE Minsk Group mediators representing the United States, France and Russia, has been trying to negotiate a peaceful resolution to the Artsakh (Karabakh) conflict.

The main obstacle is Azerbaijan’s persistence in shooting while negotiating, and intensifying its attacks on the eve of every crucial meeting for settlement of the conflict. Such unconstructive behavior is totally unacceptable for everyone involved in the peace process. Azerbaijan intentionally escalates the violence on such occasions in order to pressure the international community to force Armenia into making unfair concessions on Artsakh.

To make matters worse, every time Azerbaijani forces launch attacks on Artsakh or Armenia, the Minsk Group mediators issue a routine statement urging both sides to stop firing, thereby equating the violator with the victim. In addition, the mediators cover up their irresponsible statement by claiming that they are not certain which side initiated the shooting.

In October, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce (R–CA) and Ranking Democrat Eliot Engel of New York, initiated a letter signed by 85 House members, to U.S. co-chair, Amb. James Warlick, urging him to take all necessary steps to withdraw snipers from the border, deploy gunfire locator systems along the Line of Contact, and increase the number of field monitors. These measures were accepted by Armenia, Artsakh, the US Congress, and the Minsk Group co-chairs, but rejected by Azerbaijan because of its intent to conceal and continue its warmongering initiatives. Under these untenable circumstances, the three mediators may consider placing gunfire locators on the Artsakh side of the border to record the source of incoming fire. If the mediators are unwilling to take such action, Armenia should go ahead and purchase gunfire locators from US manufacturer Raytheon and recruit independent NGOs to monitor and report the results to the international community.

Once the source of the shooting is identified, the mediators would then be obligated to condemn the perpetrator; otherwise, they would be encouraging Azerbaijan to escalate the attacks on Armenia and Artsakh.

Meanwhile, the mediators must warn Azerbaijan’s autocratic President Ilham Aliyev that should he not cease and desist from making threats and shelling Armenia and Artsakh, they will be forced to submit Azerbaijan’s violations to the United Nations Security Council, to mandate economic sanctions against his country.

The mediators could also temporarily suspend their peacemaking activities by announcing that they are prevented from seeking a negotiated settlement to the conflict, while Azerbaijan keeps on shooting. Surely, it is not possible to fight and talk at the same time!

Since Azerbaijan is not ready to go to war — if it were, it would have started it already instead of merely threatening — it has no choice but to heed the call of the mediators to cease firing and start negotiating in earnest. Freezing the negotiations would be a serious setback for Azerbaijan because that is the only way it can hope to reach some accommodation with Armenia and Artsakh. Armenians, on the other hand, have already accomplished their objective of liberating Artsakh from Azeri occupation and have nothing to gain from further negotiations.

Should the mediators decide not to freeze the peace talks, the Armenian government may decide to suspend its participation in these unproductive negotiations, thus sending a clear message to Baku that shelling Armenia and Artsakh undermines Azerbaijan’s own interests.

If the negotiations are not suspended and Azerbaijan continues its attacks, the Armenian government may eventually respond with a “massive and asymmetrical retaliation,” as it has repeatedly warned. While some may be concerned that such an action would further escalate the violence, in fact it would diminish, if not halt the endless border skirmishes, once Azeri leaders realize that they have more to lose by fighting than talking. It is unfortunate that Pres. Aliyev is exploiting the deaths of young Azeri soldiers on the frontlines to distract his people’s attention away from massive violations of civil rights, corruption at the highest echelons of his government, and abysmal economic conditions due to diminishing oil revenues.

I had the opportunity to discuss some of these issues last week with various officials in Washington, D.C., while Artsakh’s Foreign Minister Garen Mirzoyan was in town to meet with members of Congress and US mediator Amb. Warlick. Two receptions were held to honor the visiting Foreign Minister at the Armenian Embassy and on Capitol Hill, the latter co-hosted by the U.S. Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues, Armenian National Committee of America, Armenian Assembly of America, and the U.S. Office of the Nagorno Karabagh Republic. Several House members, Amb. Warlick, and other dignitaries attended the congressional reception to the chagrin of Azerbaijan’s Embassy which had dispatched a small group of Azeris to protest the event. Chairman Royce announced during the reception that he had asked Amb. Warlick to come to the House of Representatives this week for a briefing on the Artsakh conflict.

A large number of ANCA activists from throughout the USA, including this writer, joined Foreign Minister Mirzoyan in Washington last week, to share a message of peace and democracy for Artsakh with dozens of House and Senate members, urging them to recognize its independence from Azerbaijan.

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.


  1. Masis said:

    Bravo Mr. Sassounian! I strongly feel we should not negotiate with those who don’t show any peaceful intentions. In the civilized world, negotiations occur once people want peace. Aliyev is wanting war.

    I am pleased to see some movement towards justice from the US mediators. Finally, they are promoting some of the principles that this country was founded upon: freedom, independence, self determination. However, the attacks by Aliyev merit a response of some sort, the mildest of which should be to cancel any meetings with him or his government. Look at the Israelis, Russians, and even the US as examples. They don’t negotiate with terrorists or ones who keep bombing them. Sarkissian should cancel his meeting with Aliyev and have our artillery meet Azeris or our drones meet Oil Refineries in order to honor reciprocity in this relationship. Our responses must be so profound that even people of their level of comprehension will realize that it is not worth continually attacking us.

    • Arn.Sweden. said:

      One can not wait and let small blody incidents like this,
      slowly letting one bleed to death.

      As Putin did put it –

      ” If a Fight is inivitible – go and fight first ” !.
      As experince has it –
      ” Action always defeat reaction ” !.


  2. Urardatsy said:

    I couldn’t agree more with what Mr. Sassounian is saying. It is very obvious that the – so far – empty threats made by Armenia in the past have only encouraged Aliev and his gang of thugs to go a step further each time in their aggression towards Armenia and Artsakh (known as Nagorno Karabakh under the Azeri occupation). It is also very obvious that the only language that the Azeris under Aliev will understand is that “Might is Right”. History has shown that a pre-emptive strike is the only solution to teach Aliev a good lesson that he can abuse Armenia’s patience only up to a certain point. The only question then becomes: Are the Armenians in such a position to carry out such a pre-emptive strike to have peace for another plus or minus 20 years or until Aliev is toppled, whichever comes first.

    • edward demian said:

      A preemptive strike has to be backed up by some serious strategic gains. The access and land corridor to Russia and of course control of a small section of the pipeline. Otherwise, the Azery’s will retaliate massively. Only a blietzcgrieg type strike with massive strategic gains will succeed. Such gains should make sure that the pipeline and foreign investments are protected. Then, the west will impose another cease fire, Armenia will keep her gains, and be closer to its manifest destiny. A greater Armenia from sea to sea to sea.

  3. Manuk Pokosyan said:


    You need to personally go and talk to Aliev. From all your articles, it seems that you have been the agent of change, whether it was the rise of Kirk Krekorian’s fortune, or Obama being elected, or whatever.

    You need to take the next flight to Baku, set up a meeting with the Azeri powers-that-be, and get a settlement done. Based on all of your articles discussing how important you are, mediating between two third-world countries should be a piece of cake.

    Get it done!!!