ACTION ALERT: Stop Anti-Karabakh Measures in Europe

The "We are out Mountains" monument in Artsakh
The "We are out Mountains" monument in Artsakh

The “We are out Mountains” monument in Artsakh

BRUSSELS–European Armenian Federation for Justice and Democracy (ANC of Europe) has initiated a change.org petition and is urging active participation to prevent the Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe from adopting pro-Azerbaijani resolutions that can hinder the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process.

During sessions in the fall, two PACE subcommittees approved measures that contained pro-Azerbaijani rhetoric on the Nagonro-Karabakh conflict and accused Karabakh of cutting off Azerbaijani water supplies from the Sarsang reservoir.

The OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmen issued a terse statement at the time, urging international bodies to consult with the Minsk Group before issues resolutions that impede the peace process, which they were tasked to mediate.

THE EAFJD is calling on immediate action, via the change.org petition, to put an end to PACE’s “hate-filled war-rhetoric on ‪ ‎Nagorno Karabakh‬ and the favoritism by some of its members towards ‪Azerbaijan‬.”

ACT NOW and say NO to ‪Caviar Diplomacy‬, say ‪Stop Aliyev‬!

Background
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) is expected to vote on the following two draft resolutions on Nagorno-Karabakh on January 26, 2016, as a joined item on the agenda:

Draft resolution on “Escalation of violence in Nagorno-Karabakh and the other occupied territories of Azerbaijan”, rapporteur Robert Walter (UK)
Draft resolution on “Inhabitants of frontier regions of Azerbaijan are deliberately deprived of water”, rapporteur Milica Marković (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is a complex conflict the peaceful settlement of which has no other alternative. Unfortunately these two draft resolutions feed into the hate-filled war rhetoric of the current Azerbaijani government on Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and promote favoritism. Both draft resolutions evidently lack thorough, impartial research, selectively leave out crucial facts and cause harm to the negotiation process.

I herewith raise my voice against these two draft resolutions with an inflammatory content which have little to do with genuine conflict resolution and peace building and promote vested personal and financial interests of a handful of Members of PACE.

Further details on the draft resolutions:

Draft resolution on “Escalation of violence in Nagorno-Karabakh and the other occupied territories of Azerbaijan”, rapporteur Robert Walter (UK)
As a rapporteur Mr. Walter violated several rules of the Code of conduct of PACE Members such as 1. the principle of neutrality, impartiality and objectivity (rules 1.1; 1.1.1.; 1.1.4), 2. the principle on avoiding conflict of interest (rule 8), 3. the principle on not using one’s position as a PACE member to further one’s own, another person’s or entity’s interest (rule 12), 4. as well as the principle of respecting the values of the Council of Europe (rule 7).

Mr. Robert Walter and his wife Feride Alp-Walter, marketing manager of the Middle East Association, have maintained close relationship with the authorities and the ruling elites of Azerbaijan for a long time, including taking a high-level British trade mission to Baku in close cooperation with the Embassy of Azerbaijan and the European Azerbaijan Society (TEAS) – a lobbying organization which has strong ties with the Azerbaijani government and Ilham Aliyev’s inner circle.

Mr. Walter’s support for the government of Ilham Aliyev, while closing an eye on undemocratic processes in the country, has been frequently criticized by human rights activists in Azerbaijan[1], respected European watchdogs, such as Corporate Europe Observatory[2] as well as various well-known international media.

Sadly, just a first glance at the draft resolution is enough to realize that it is a word-for-word reflection of the official Azerbaijani and Turkish stance on Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Official Turkey has always openly supported Azerbaijan in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Mr. Walter and his wife, both Turkish citizens, have had cozy ties with the Turkish Government. Mr. Walter received his Turkish ID card personally from the Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu. In 2011 Mr. Çavuşoğlu was among the guests of Mr. Walter’s and Mrs. Feride Alp’s wedding.

Despite its title the draft resolution by Mr. Robert Walter is far from reflecting the reality on the escalation of tension on the contact line between Armenia and Azerbaijan and around Nagorno-Karabakh in the past months which has led to tragic deaths of civilians.

The draft resolution by Mr. Walter selectively leaves out crucial information. For instance it fails to mention important facts such as the one that unlike Armenia, on 27.09.2015 official Azerbaijan dismissed the proposal made by the OSCE Minsk Group to accept an OSCE mechanism to investigate ceasefire violations. The mechanism would enable to identify the initiator of the cease-fire violations and make it difficult for the sides to blame each other for initiating deadly attacks. The logical answer to the question why official Azerbaijan which continuously blames the Armenian side for violating the cease-fire is not interested in such a mechanism, is evident.

This draft report is also a rather dangerous and irresponsible attempt to create a parallel mechanism, without having the necessary legitimacy and the mandate from the parties involved in the conflict. The prompt critical reaction of the co-chairs of OSCE Minsk Group – the sole official body with the mandate to mediate – to the draft resolution by rapporteur Mr. Walter emphasizes the harm it causes to the negotiation process and thus to the peaceful settlement of the conflict.

2. Draft resolution on “Inhabitants of frontier regions of Azerbaijan are deliberately deprived of water”, rapporteur Milica Marković (Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Unfortunately the draft resolution written by Mrs. Milica Marković lacks impartial, thorough research. Despite the prompt invitations of both the Armenian and Nagorno-Karabakh authorities to visit Sarsang reservoir (at “any time convenient for the rapporteur”) as initially requested by rapporteur Milica Marković, neither Ms. Marković nor technical expert Dr. Lydia S. Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia were on the ground. Thus both the draft resolution and the technical report (which is supposed to be the basis of the draft resolution) are based on the rather approximate simulations of the corresponding Azerbaijani ministry based on the data of 1993 and hearsay, although there was clearly an opportunity to visit the reservoir and get acquainted with the actual state of things.

Rapporteur Marković evidently uses this humanitarian issue as a pretext in order to make highly biased statements on Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in general. A brief comparison of the technical report and the draft resolution, which is supposed to be based on the technical report, makes is clear that Ms. Marković deliberately exaggerated the consequences of potential danger or left important facts stated in the technical report out of the draft resolution, since this information does not fit in with her biased intentions.

The technical report drafted by expert Dr. Lydia S. Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia clearly specifies: “Although Sarsang is an earth-fill dam, which is far less dangerous and much more safe, when it comes to sudden collapse in principle (e.g. as compared to arched dams), it should be pointed out that without a visual inspection of the dam there is no way to assess its condition and any potential security risks from the technical point of view”. Despite this, the rapporteur and the technical expert opted to ignore the invitation of the Authorities of Nagorno-Karabakh to visit Sarsang reservoir and examine the state of inspection and maintenance of the reservoir. Instead, Mrs. Marković produced a report which refers to the rather approximate simulations of the Azerbaijani Ministry of Emergency situations, based on more than 22 year-old information.

According to the technical report: “Sarsang alone cannot cause a major flood in the problematic lower Kura region, but the lack of communication between Armenia and Azerbaijan raises fears that unexpected water releases from Sarsang may add to flooding consequences at periods of excessive rainfall in the area”. Nonetheless, instead of urging the sides, to engage in a dialogue in order to ensure a safe management of the reservoir, Ms. Marković demands an “immediate withdrawal of Armenian armed forces from the region concerned.”

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

5 Comments

  1. Hayk said:

    Currently when the situation on the armenian-azebaijan border is the strainest and explosive than ever,it is necessary to take fixed and decisive steps to prevent azerbaijanian antiarmenian risky and falsified campaign.Informative war is one of the most decisive and fundamental elements of Nagorno Karabakh and any other conflict which has essential investment in the creation of international approaches toward the conflict and the methods of conflict resolution.Azerbaijanian side does almost everything to pull international community to its side and to form favourable atmosphere for pro-azerbaijanian settlement of the conflict.All of us must do his best to invest in this initiative.

  2. Michael Mirzoyan said:

    Artsakh is a historic armenian land like many other regions have been taken by Turks using force and annihilation of Armenians and other Christians inhabiting those lands for long time before turks even put their foot there. It’s absurd and socking to see Christian European countries supporting azerbajan and turkey in their endless pursuit of armenian elimination from their native land.

  3. Erna Rohlandt said:

    “Concerned region” is depicted as Artsakh province of Armenia already by Strabo. That is long before existence or invasion of Azerbaijani Turkish nomadic, barbaric tribes in Armenian Highland and Caucasus which has been causing Genocides and devastation to native Armenians and others. Artsakh and now is populated by Armenians. Why does Europe want the region to become part of Turan, ,world for Turks ?? How much are these people getting bribed by Azerbaijan and Turkey to conduct such anti-human actions which will eventually ruin Europe and the world too?!

*

Top