Milling About

Garen Yegparian
Garen Yegparian

Garen Yegparian

BY GAREN YAGPAIRIAN

This is about Mills, Ambassador Richard M. Mills, Jr., the ninth U.S. “Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary” to Armenia after Harry J. Gilmore, Peter Tomsen, Michael Craig Lemmon, John Malcolm Ordway, John Marshall Evans, Marie L. Yovanovitch, John A. Heffern (based on Wikipedia).

It’s an impressive sounding title these folks have carried, isn’t it? Yet, they are obligated to parrot the State Department and Oval Office policy line, regardless of how offensive, absurd, or just plain wrong it is. You may recall the fairly strident criticism I directed at Yovanovitch almost seven years ago in a piece titled “Yavan-oghloo” for the insulting mindset directed against our community and the unacceptability of her mouthings in the immediate aftermath of Obama’s first-of-seven denialist Genocide statements.

I saw Mills when he presented at the Western Prelacy on March 10. I had already heard about some of the things he was saying, specifically, from Boston, on his tour of Armenian communities. These tours by the ambassadors to Armenia are generally a good idea, are appreciated, and should continue. Their up-side is the opportunity they provide to get first hand impressions and information about U.S. activity in Armenia and, conversely, provide feedback. They also demonstrate at least a nominal, superficial, respect for the Diaspora. The down-side is having to stomach irritating (at best) and foolhardy positions espoused, repeated in city after city.

Mills’ presentation was generally upbeat and, unsurprisingly, consistent with his previous presentations. But, some of his comments may have been “refined” and “honed” to elicit less negative response. What he said in Boston regarding trade between Armenia and Iran, based on the information I received, was far less positive than what I heard. This is probably a good thing. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about his comments regarding ISIS/Daesh-Turkey cooperation and Obama’s Genocide denialism.

Mills asserted there was no evidence of cooperation between Ankara and the crazies ravaging Iraq and Syria. That was coupled with a “disclaimer” that if militants did cross the border from Turkey into Syria, it was only because the border was left porous to allow refugees to escape from Syria! He also claimed there was no proof of Turkey buying Daesh oil, explaining how the latter sold the black ooze at the wellhead to independents, blah, blah, blah. I suppose those satellite pictures of the oil tanker trucks are figments of our imagination and Italy’s investigation of Erdogan’s son for money laundering is just for laughs.

As to Genocide recognition by Turkey, Mills repeated Obama’s “approach” of seeking a full, frank, and something-or-other (I would have made an effort to remember exact wording if it was even a remotely legitimate approach) discussion” in and by Turkey of the unspeakable word. Interesting, isn’t it? A full-frank discussion could be had without first saying what’s being discussed, based on this “brilliant” presidential approach.

In response to his Daesh and Genocide comments, I could not but ask the ambassador to stop disseminating this poppycock and insulting our intelligence, suggesting that the first thing to do when finding yourself in a hole is to stop digging. In this case, that “silence is golden” even if non-responsiveness to us about these issues is also unsatisfying, at least it’s not degrading!

To end on a positive note, I do have to give credit for the measured approach being taken towards and full awareness of corruption in Armenia. Mills described four areas prioritized by the RoA government to target and the financial support being provided to pursue the anti-corruption fight in those areas. He observed that the day-to-day corruption surrounding the life of citizens has improved slightly, with tax collections and pensions becoming more automated. This eliminates face-to-face opportunities for officials to seek bribes. But, he was honest in observing that the large scale, oligarch level, corruption is predatory and getting worse, with its attendant consequences of expatriation and disincentives to foreign investment.

Mills also suggested visiting the embassy when Americans want to engage in business in Armenia because they might be able to avoid some pitfalls by taking advantage of resources available to them.

Let officialdom – elected legislators and State Department functionaries – know what you think. Keep up the pressure. Remember, pearls are formed through the constant irritation caused by a grain of sand inside an oyster (I must give credit to the “Garfield” comic strip for this last pearl of wisdom).

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

4 Comments

  1. Colin said:

    Garen, why do you give ambassador mills such a hard time? He’s the ambassador to the republic of armenia, not turkey. This is just angry American identity politics.

  2. Alex Postallian said:

    I can see why,they parrot their leader,to maintain a LOW PAYING POSITION,OUT FOR BRIBES…SHIP THE obummer,and all overseas,to their natural habitat….AFRICAN JUNGLE.

  3. Michael Kalustian said:

    Alex, if you have a comment, you should articulate it in a way that will persuade the reader to see your logic rather than resort to demagoguery. No doubt Obama has been a massive disappointment with regards to his Armenian policies, but your abrasive post won’t help, and may turn off those that may be sympathetic to our cause. I agree with David, what you posted is shameful.

    Colin, why should Garen take it easy on ambassador Mills. He represents an institution that is most responsible after Turkey for the continued denial of the Armenian genocide. My grandparents died without any justice for the horrific crimes that were committed against them. If the State Department were an individual, they could be prosecuted for being an accessory after the fact. It doesn’t matter whether he’s ambassador to Armenia, Turkey or Timbuktu, his position and that of his employer are indefensible. If you are Armenian, I would suggest that you stand up and demand equality and justice. If you are not, then you can’t understand the mentality Garen has as he writes his article and it would be preferable if you keep your comments to yourself.

*

Top