The Usual Suspects, and… Not

Garen Yegparian
Garen Yegparian

Garen Yegparian


Almost one hundred Armenian dead in the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (rendered still with the disgusting Soviet era, Russian influenced spelling), at least five hundred on the Azerbaijani side, war crimes (everyone’s seen the gruesome pictures of the three dead elderly Armenians and read about the mutilation of the corpses returned to Artsakh), risk of a long term war re-erupting – who’s responsible?

Obviously, the list starts with and in Baku and Aliyev, but also includes many others: the U.S., Turkey, Russia, the Minsk Group, the media, Europe (and its parts), and even Armenia. But there are unusual aspects to this whole mess as well – a questionable ally, Israel, and national unity. Clearly, Azerbaijan wants to reoccupy Artsakh. It has built up a massive arms reserve with oil money. Its leadership is very corrupt and unpopular, thus vulnerable to public discontent, especially with oil money being scant these days. Thus, vilifying and attacking Armenians is a convenient distraction. They also have some very tentative, initial, rumblings from national minorities living within the country’s borders, the Talysh and the Lezghis.

Let’s start with the Minsk Group – France, Russia, and the U.S. – which is charged with bringing about a negotiated settlement to the Artsakh issue. Not only have they failed to accomplish their charge (of course the three parties to the conflict play a role in this), but they have enabled Azerbaijan to persist in its intermittent attacks on Armenians. How? By playing the “fair and balanced” game whereby they never assigned culpability to the offending side, Azerbaijan, thereby giving Baku the go-ahead to continue its misdeeds. Result= bloody four-day war.

The U.S., being the planet’s hyper-power, carries much blame beyond the confines of the Minsk Group. When Section 907, which imposed a ban on U.S. arms sales to Azerbaijan was gutted, that sent a bad signal. When time after time, Azerbaijan’s ceasefire violations (likely numbering in the hundreds by now) were greeted with admonitions to both sides to refrain from resorting to shooting, rather than negotiating, that leaves the criminal free to repeat the crime. When oil and pipeline concerns trump everything – justice, reason, wise diplomacy, bad behavior is rewarded. When Washington cow-tows to Ankara because of its pro-Turkish bureaucracy’s inertia, Aliyev keeps on war- and hate-mongering. When Vice President Biden meets with, and effectively honors and lends credibility to dictator Aliyev, the latter thinks he can do no wrong. Result= bloody four-day war.

Turkey may also have triggered, encouraged, or simply supported the latest round of war. Erdoğan probably relished, maybe was even desperate for, a distraction in the region from the mess he’s created with the Kurds, in Syria, and for Turkish society. He may also have wanted to use Aliyev to create a distraction for Putin who’s recent air and other support for Assad have seriously hurt Ankara’s ISIS/Daesh allies. It might even be as simple as Erdoğan wanting to harm Armenia and Armenians. Result= bloody four-day war.

Russia is Churchill’s “riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma” but he also thought the key to deciphering it lies in its national interest. Clearly, Moscow wants to keep what it Russo-centrically sees as the “Transcaucasus” within its sphere of influence. So, playing one country off against another suits its purpose because then it can play “peacemaker” between the sides. More interesting is an interpretation presented at a recent ARF meeting – whenever Moscow has felt threatened from the West (currently because of the Crimea/Ukraine conflict), it has initiated action to the south (currently Artsakh and Syria). The purpose of this being to create leverage, a negotiating point, which it can give away later. Thus might Armenian interests be sacrificed. It could also be that this is just part of Putin’s efforts to woo Aliyev away from the West, and/or drive a wedge between them. It’s even possible, though highly unlikely, that a reverse game was played, i.e. this was an opportunity to cool Azerbaijan off by having it take a beating at Armenian armed forces hands. Result= bloody four-day war.

The international media’s effective silence about Artsakh and Azerbaijan’s repeated violations, coupled with the oil-money fueled lobbying emanating from Baku, result in a lack of awareness of how destructive the current regime in Azerbaijan is. These give Baku cover to continue its policy of attacking whenever a meeting discussing Artsakh is imminent or in session. Result= bloody four-day war.

Europe, as a whole, and as individual states, has also mostly given Azerbaijan pass over its unacceptable actions. Think of the recent Sarsang Dam resolution, the Safarov axe-murder and its subsequent developments, and the ongoing business-as-usual election of Azerbaijan and its representatives to high positions in European bodies. Result= bloody four-day war.

Finally, Armenia also bears some responsibility. By not responding more harshly to increasing border attacks over the last few years and employing potent diplomacy, it gave Azerbaijan much wriggle room. There are those who are asserting that the money looted from state coffers through the systemic corruption bedeviling Armenia could have gone to buying better armaments for Armenian troops. Result= bloody four-day war.

The first unusual ingredient of this mess is that Armenia’s (formal) strategic ally, its partner in the CSTO, its historic “protector” – Russia, has been delivering billions of dollars’ worth of arms to Azerbaijan, the self-described enemy of all Armenians! Russian claims assert this helps keep Baku from being even more aggressive. Whatever the reason, the cost in Armenian lives is too high. People have taken to the streets in Yerevan because of this, and Moscow should take heed. Armenia is Russia’s only natural ally in the region, but Armenia can not. must not, and will not be Russia’s puppet (or worse, sacrificial lamb). Enough is enough – forcing Sarkissian (embarrassingly) to ditch the EU, last minute, and join the Eurasian “zone” Putin’s creating; Permyakov; and buying up most of the energy systems in the country and preventing greater energy cooperation with Iran. It’s time Russia lived up to its end of the bargain.

Another unusual ingredient of this four day war came from Israel. Acting out of its concern for energy supplies (I read one figure that 40% of its oil comes from Baku), supporting its arms manufacturers, and access to easy spying on Iran, Israel has sold very modern weaponry, including suicide drones, to Azerbaijan. This is very dangerous for Armenians, and a major stain on Israel’s reputation.

But the biggest “unusuality” has been the massive outpouring of people going to the front to serve the homeland. This sense of pride and unity is very hopeful. It gives the corrupt regime in Yerevan an opportunity to reform before it is too late and become true contributors to a better future for Armenia.

Let’s use this opportunity to build a more cohesive nation, to get the word out to the media so they start covering Artsakh sufficiently, and to put an end to political and diplomatic leaders’ dithering and spinelessness in confronting Aliyev’s and Azerbaijan’s gross bellicosity. Baku may have given us the best gift possible – the chance to settle the Artsakh issue favorably and justly!


Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.


  1. Raffi said:

    Solution: invade Azerbiajan, sell invaded Oil and Gas and make Armenia rich and handicap Azerbaijan’s and Turkey’s finances (Turkey receives free and discounted Gas and Oil), it will reduce their recourse for war, if can’t invade? just blow them up, when income falls, they will no more be able to purchase arms, and all scum bags in the west who support and benefit from Azerbaijan will disappear.

  2. Justme said:

    Who cares who is responsible?! What really matters is the outcome. We saw that in spite of all its weapon acquisitions the Azerbaijani side was unable to retake any thing except maybe a hill or two that they captured due to the element of surprise at the very first hours, but we also saw the shortcomings of the Armenian side. On the border, our soldiers did every thing possible though in many cases outgunned. In Yerevan, there was a clear lack of strategy. Azerbaijan is utilizing all the cards it possesses to inflict as much damage as possible to Armenians. in return, Armenians don’t even notice what cards they have! We sometimes tend to forget that the whole country of Azerbaijan is simply a gas station and the main pipe which comes out of that gas station is right next to our border. The question is why is it that Armenia did not open a second front in the north? Do we even have the power to open a second front next to the area where the BTC pipeline is? Do we have the kind of weapons that can interrupt the flow of oil? If not how can we acquire them? These are some questions that I always thought the authorities in Armenia have clear answers to them but right now I am not sure about that. The problem is not the land, anything lost can be retrieved. The problem is when you don’t have any strategy, you sit down and watch what is Azerbaijan going to do next and then you respond and even then you don’t know what exactly you have to do, you keep looking towards Russia and US for answers, that is not what we need in Armenia. The next war is going to be more devastating, we need to understand that the peace process is dead and we need smart leaders who have plans for a final blow to Azerbaijan, something that will put an end to their oil dream and will make it clear that in case of war Azerbaijan will lose its main lifeline, oil.

  3. Khatchig Hamamdjian said:

    Excellent editorial as usual. Your comments are right on target. Our only strength is our unity. Unfortunately we can only trust ourselves…

  4. MalS said:

    Armenians should toss some shells or missiles in the direction of Azerbaijan’s BTC and BTE pipelines.
    They are not far from Artsakh.
    They are owned by oil consortiums, mostly Western companies, a very small amount owned by Russia.
    That will get the West’s attention. If it doesn’t, blow up the pipelines.
    Russia will like that. It will raise worldwide oil prices.

  5. Jacque said:

    Good analysis .
    It’s time to think out of the box.
    We should never be coght off gard again, we need eyes in the sky and involve China into the