Decision on Karabakh’s Status Not in Armenia’s Purview

Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister, Shavarsh Kocharyan
Shavarsh Kocharyan

Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister, Shavarsh Kocharyan

YEREVAN (ArmRadio)—In order to continue the negotiations with the mediation of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs, it’s necessary to reinforce the ceasefire regime, Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister Shavarsh Kocharyan said in an interview with the Austrian Die Presse.

He reminded that despite the periodic violations, the ceasefire agreement signed in 1994 by Nagorno-Karabakh, Armenia and Azerbaijan is still in place. “Azerbaijan violated the ceasefire on April 2, unleashing military actions. The ceasefire was restored under verbal agreements reached on April 5. Azerbaijan is trying to foil the Minsk process. Now it’s important to reinforce the ceasefire regime, because soldiers were killed even after April 5.”

Asked why the escalation happened now, Kocharyan said “that question should be addressed to Baku.”

“Azerbaijan pursues the policy of solving this conflict through force. Obviously, they cherished the illusion of solving the issue through a Blitzkrieg, but failed.  There is a great discontent in the country connected with the corrupt regime, and war is a means to divert the public attention,” he added.

“War is a threat to all of us, both Armenians and Azerbaijanis,” the Deputy Foreign Minister noted.

Kocharyan said “international mediators should condemn Baku’s attacks” when asked what measures should be taken on the issue.

“Baku constantly demands return of “occupied territories,” but keeps silent about the occupied regions of Nagorno-Karabakh, which remain under Azeri control. The Madrid Principles speak about Karabakh self-determination and Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity. There is an opportunity for mutual concessions,” he added.

“Unilateral concessions are excluded. One should realize that there are questions outside Armenia’s competence. Yerevan is not authorized to make a decision on the status of Nagorno-Karabakh; it is up to the state of Karabakh. We refrain from recognizing Nagorno-Karabakh in order to maintain the negotiation process,” Kocharyan said.

“If Azerbaijan unleashes large-scale aggression, it will lead to the recognition of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic by Armenia,” he stressed.

Speaking about Russian relations, Kocharyan said “Moscow is our ally, but has close economic ties with Baku; therefore, it will be inclined to keep the balance in the South Caucasus.”

As for the sale of Russian weapons to Azerbaijan, he said Armenia has raised the issue on the highest level. “I stand for complete embargo on weapons for all conflicting parties. The Minsk Group co-chairing countries can reach that at the UN Security Council.”

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

2 Comments

  1. Robert Assarian said:

    It is very said that Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister Shavarsh Kocharyan doesn’t know about Geography or Armenian History, calling Armenia and Artsakh South Caucases. Armenia and Arsakh are in the Armenian Highlands.

  2. Lusik said:

    I just submitted a comment to the Turkish spokesman of Foreign ministry, and now my Armenian fellow displays a “lack” of simple comprehension what is appropriate to the moment.

    Read “In order to continue the negotiations …, it’s necessary to reinforce the ceasefire regime, Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister Shavarsh Kocharyan said in an interview with the Austrian Die Presse.”

    Is there any problem with coming forward with something like this
    “Before a resumption of any kind of conversation with murderous regime, the Armenian side requests
    a) a comprehensive investigation of the crimes committed during 4-day invasion by Azeri military against civil Armenian population;
    b) a recognition of the continuity of the violent and brutal force approach by Azeri leaders towards Armenian population. Like it was before, it will be in the future – the present is the witness;
    c) that the EU offices condemn the atrocities, using appropriate terms and stop fruitless “balanced” approach in evaluation of the conflicts;
    d) that an immediate change in the format of the round table – with direct participation of Artsakh’s representatives (the original format of 1994)” takes place in order to penalize Azeri’s appetites to commit such crimes in the future.

*

Top