Speaking Armenian: Everyman’s History

Garen Yegparian
Garen Yegparian

Garen Yegparian

BY GAREN YEGPARIAN

I’m no anthropologist, historian, linguist, or sociologist. I do know how to watch and listen, and have for over four decades (and longer if you count grandmother stories). So, I’m going to allow myself to size up the status of our spoken Armenian language, or at least describe how I see we’ve gotten to where we are today, in an EXTREMELY compact, probably oversimplified, package.

From the time Armenians, as such, came into existence, anywhere from three to five thousand years ago, depending on who you ask, we spoke our language. Sure, it was Urartian, and other proto-Armenians’ languages, at first. But it gelled into what we now know as crapar (grabar), Classical Armenian.

With the adoption of Christianity, we are told, the need to write in our own alphabet arose and Gregory had his “vision”, coming up with our original 36 letters. However, I’ve had a poster since my early teen (even pre-teen) years, that showed some older alphabets of ours. This topic will sidetrack the discussion, and is easily fodder whole articles, so, back to the spoken language.

Of course, we had to contend with various conquering overlords (Arabs- of various dynasties, Byzantines, Greeks, Medes, Persians – again, of various dynasties, Romans, Russians) throughout our history, having to communicate in the official state language, Armenian did some borrowing along the way, unavoidably. Our homeland being located on major trade routes probably contributed to this process, too.

Yet, until the Turkic arrivals, at the time of Middle Armenian, we still spoke our often mutually unintelligible dialects in our villages, towns, and cities, whether tucked away in hidden gorges or high mountain redoubts.

Then it began, one of the longest periods of continuous subjugation to the same foreigner’s rule, under what ultimately coalesced into the Ottoman Empire. This time, we lost our political classes and hierarchy who opportunistically converted to Islam to retain their hereditary status (a process which, to be fair, had begun even under Byzazntine rule), eliminating an important locus of Armenian speaking. Coupled with the forced conversions to Islam over the centuries and the Armenian Church’s consequent “expulsion” of these people as Armenians lead to a diminution of the Armenian population in our homeland. They became “Kurds” and “Turks” so now, we were obligated to use other languages in daily life with our “new” neighbors.

Then there was the constant Ottoman/Turkish persecution. In many places speaking Armenian meant having your tongue cut out. This led some parts of our homeland to lose the language almost entirely. Cilicia was such an area. Other than some of the mountainous towns and villages, Armenians there had become Turkish speaking by the 1800s. I even heard them described once as “Christian Turks”! Only with the arrival of Western Christian missionaries and the spread of literacy they triggered did a slow restoration of spoken Armenian commence.

Then, of course, Genocide struck. Everything changed. In some ways, with the removal of immediate Turkish pressure, returning to Armenian speaking was eased, especially in the Middle East where we were RECOGNIZED as Armenians, not just as individuals. That created very strong communities along with their educational institutions. Turkish speaking was actively discouraged and Armenian was relearned by the new generations. In the West, the situation was different. For a variety of reasons, Armenian day schools started be instituted two generations later. Meanwhile, you had an immigrant generation that struggled to impart Armenian to their children, and did. But then prejudice took its toll. At least in the U.S., there was much pressure to speak English. Kids being kids and not wanting to be different, avoided speaking Armenian. Then when they grew up and had kids, even though they spoke Armenian, and initially taught the second Diaspora born generation the language, as soon as those kids hit school, the parents often stopped speaking Armenian to them, even at home. They idea was to avoid putting their children through the same difficulties they had experienced. So in the West, Armenian speaking was largely lost, or on its way to being lost.

But starting in the 1960s, a new phenomenon manifested. A re-dispersion. Armenians form the more Armenian-speaking parts of the world (Middle East & Armenia) started moving west, providing a boost, at least temporarily, to the level of Armenian-speaking in the communities they settled in. This also created tensions when too much attention was focused on language vs. a more comprehensive Armenian identity retention/development agenda. Before concluding this chronology with where we stand today, a look at parallel track is necessary.

That track is what was happening meanwhile in our homeland, and by that I mean Soviet Armenia/Artzakh/Javakhk/Nakhichevan, Turkish occupied Western Armenia, and for this discussion, I am including Bolis as well. In the east, Armenians were being forced out of their homes in Nakhichevan, less so in Artzakh, and slightly in Javakhk. Simultaneously, these regions were deprived of Armenian governance, hence language instruction in schools was weak, leading to the spoken language being retained, but at the level of local dialects. In these three regions, along with Soviet Armenia, heavy Russian influence came to permeate the language, from vocabulary to the tone and lilt of people’s speech.

In Bolis, Armenian schools continued to function. That, coupled with efforts to find and educate orphans from Western Armenia led to a fairly strong habit of speaking Armenian (though today, there are many who are exclusively Turkish speakers). In Western Armenia, rumors of pockets of hidden Armenians retaining the language persisted. Some of the survivors remembered the language, but they’re effectively gone now. There are the Hamshens, living near the border with Georgia, whose language is clearly a dialect of Western Armenian.

Today, we confront a largely unenviable mix of good and bad news on the Armenian speaking front. The bad news includes depletion of our Middle Eastern communities, making it more difficult to maintain Armenian speaking as a natural, practical, useful, part of everyday life. Loss of language capacity even in the Middle Eastern communities (I read an article a few months ago wherein the author describes an Armenian school graduate in Lebanon who did not know/remember the Armenian word for the month of June!). In the Republic of Armenia, of all places, an insufferable level of Russian words are still mixed into everyday speech, even in the media (broadcast, print, and electronic). Armenian usage is declining almost everywhere. Many people (almost) sneer when this topic is raised, criticizing those who express concern about needless use of non-Armenian words when speaking Armenian (these are, ironically, often people who can speak neither Armenian nor their host country’s language well).

The good news is that in at least two places, Argentina and Canada, there are examples of 3rd and 4th generation Diasporans who speak Armenian quite well as a result of the efforts of the community. These may be models to study and emulate. There is a lot of attention and effort directed at the issue now. Hopefully this will be done in a positive, constructive way, and not in such a manner that what ought to be a unifying factor – our language – becomes divisive, as happened in in1970s and 1980s. There are hints that a “merger” of our eastern and western dialects may be underway. Should this occur, the incentive would dissipate for our youth to speak to one another in host-country languages because they don’t understand the “other” dialect. I’ve even heard (as far back as the 1980s) advocacy of a “mixed” language, where the structure is Armenian, but most of the words are English/French/Spanish/etc. There is also the re-emergence of Western Armenia’s hidden Armenians, some of whom are thrilled to learn and speak their mother tongue.

Ultimately, if we’re serious about being Armenian and reestablishing our presence in all of our homeland, we cannot dismiss the importance of language. But, we must be careful not to turn our advocacy, love, and use of Armenian in speech into a divisive issue. Let’s use it, not lose it.

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

13 Comments

  1. State of Emergency said:

    It really doesn’t matter if you speak or don’t speak Armenian if you’re outside of the motherland. If domiciling outside then language is the least of your worries. Assimilation and intermarriage does much more damage than the language used to communicate. The purity and conservation of the mother tongue should be the responsibility of those who live in Armenia. If it’s being chopped up there then we really don’t deserve any sympathy. The author cites how past powers forced us to forget our language, what is the excuse now??

    • Ararat said:

      It absolutely does matter if you speak Armenian or not outside the homeland. If you speak Armenian, more so if you are fluent in it, you are much more aware of the Armenian culture, which includes Armenian music, literature, etc., and inclined to practice it and participate in it. The fluency in the Armenian language also gives you a distinct sense of belonging to your roots even though you are living in your adopted host country. The Armenian language also acts as a shield against assimilation. Those who speak the language almost always end up with their own kinds and even though they have socially, publicly that is, have assimilated into the main stream society they have a private life that is distinct from their public one.

      • State of Emergency said:

        If you either choose or are forced (think corruption) to live outside of the homeland then it’s futile to continue the la la land charade. Like William Saroyan once quipped after a visit ” it’s best to love your homeland from a distance…..” In other words, in a fantastic trans-like state….AKA la la land.

  2. Robert Assarian said:

    It was not the western missionaries that restored the Armenian language rather it was the Mekhitarist fathers back in early 18th century that began the restoration work of the Armenian language.

  3. Gaidzag Shahbazian said:

    Great article. If we really are proud of our nationality we have to use Armenian names for our children. A name is a term used for identification.

  4. Arthur said:

    Forgetting how to speak in Armenian is becoming a problem in our youth here in Los Angeles and im sure in many other parts of the diaspora. The first and most important solution to this problem comes from the PARENTS. They must speak Armenian at home with the kids and enforce they do to. As long as they are speaking in some form of Armenian dialect, is whats important. We can deal with the Armenian language problems as you mentioned, along the way. But speaking it is most important.

    • State of Emergency said:

      Please direct your concerns and suggestions to the parents in Armenia. Trying to fix the diaspora is like patching a car’s tire with bubble gum.

    • Ararat said:

      Arthur – You are right when you say the solution to Armenian language illiteracy starts at home and that it is the responsibility of the parents to teach their kids the language. This is very true because children at very early age are very curious creatures and pick up a lot before they are ready for school. Obviously living outside the motherland has adverse effect in practicing and putting to use the language because we are surrounded by non-speakers and pressured to learn and speak the language of the land to get ahead in life but it is not the main reason for not knowing the language. There are hundreds of thousands of Armenians living in many Armenian Diasporas in the Middle East but all of them speak Armenian. Every single Armenian there is bilingual at minimum and many more speak multiple languages. So then the question is why is it that in such closed and oppressive Middle Eastern societies the Armenian language thrives but in free western societies, the United States in particular, the exact opposite is true?

      I say the main problem in the United States is the fact that it is a materialistic country and there are too many distractions that undermine the importance of the mother language. You hear many say why should they learn the language if they are never going to use it. If these people were brought up on Armenian language at an early age they would not only never say such things but they would also hang onto the language and feel a purpose in using and maintaining it for the future generations. Another problem I think is because Armenian schools are not affordable to most Armenian kids so their parents don’t bother sending them to Armenian schools. The affordability of such schools is very critical and our cultural and educational leaders in the Diaspora should realize and remedy that. We need to think long term and look at the big picture and realize that the language plays one of the major roles in our future as a people and a nation-state. Language is more than just a form of communication. It is the foundation of our culture, nation and identity.

      հայոց լեզուն հիմքնա հայ ազգի գոյատեվման!

      • State of Emergency said:

        Ararat – “There are hundreds of thousands of Armenians living in many Armenian Diasporas in the Middle East but all of them speak Armenian.”….That’s only because we view the peoples, cultures, and languages of those countries as inferior and backwards, so we end to stay away from them. Same for other Christian minorities in the region. They’re more fluent in French than their mother tongue. Armenians living in Russia, France and English speaking countries regard their host countries as advance societies and therefore want to assimilate.

        “Another problem I think is because Armenian schools are not affordable to most Armenian kids so their parents don’t bother sending them to Armenian schools.”…. If they can afford to lease a car then they can afford to send their kids to Armenian school. But the problem is not that, it’s the fact that most Armenians do not care nor appreciate their own culture. Again, they are more interested in becoming more local than the locals because of their inferiority complex. Even the children of genocide survivors (second generation) refused to learn the language (i.e. Charles Aznavour, Kirk Krikorian, George Deukmedjian, Cher, etc….). It’s futile to fight the tide. All conservation efforts should be directed to the people in Armenia. Without a country the language will fail to survive.

  5. State of Emergency said:

    Ararat – “There are hundreds of thousands of Armenians living in many Armenian Diasporas in the Middle East but all of them speak Armenian.”….That’s only because we view the peoples, cultures, and languages of those countries as inferior and backwards, so we want to stay away from them. Same for other Christian minorities in the region. They’re more fluent in French than their mother tongue. However, Armenians living in Russia, France and English speaking countries regard their host countries as advance societies and therefore want to assimilate with them.

    “Another problem I think is because Armenian schools are not affordable to most Armenian kids so their parents don’t bother sending them to Armenian schools.”…. If they can afford to lease a car then they can afford to send their kids to Armenian school. But the problem is not that, it’s the fact that most Armenians do not care nor appreciate their own culture. Again, they are more interested in becoming more local than the locals because of their inferiority complex. Even the children of genocide survivors (second generation) refused to learn the language (i.e. Charles Aznavour, Kirk Krikorian, George Deukmedjian, Cher, etc….). It’s futile to fight the tide. All conservation efforts should be directed to the people in Armenia. Without a country the language will fail to survive even under the best circumstances.

    • Movses said:

      “they are more interested in becoming more local than the locals because of their inferiority complex” wow this describes my father so well. We emigrated from Armenia a little more than 6 years ago and he’s already a super right wing , pro everything America, anti immigrant trump supporter. Even though he graduated from an Armenian university and has an Armenian education, his Armenian is already composed of like >60% English words. He already makes fun of me whenever I play traditional Armenian music I am guessing it won’t be long before he’s blasting country music. So sad now that I think about it

  6. onjig said:

    Good Garen, good, you are very right. Hyer ou Myer are gone and even as I long for the taste of mamas cooking, I long for the sound of our Mother Tongue on my ears. I’ve made flash cards for myself and the children, not children anymore, as my father made cards for me. We are trying to learn more and speakmore our language, it feels so good, the sound, the music as they say it in Armenian. When the call out the Armenian name of our animals, even that too feels like home.
    Thank you for what you have written~

    onjig

    http://www.hyeforum.com

Leave a Reply to Ararat Cancel reply

*

Top