The Distorted Image of Politics in Armenia

Razmig Shirinian

Razmig Shirinian


When people walk or drive on roads with potholes, do not enjoy public or private toilets, electricity, and running cold or hot water in their houses, or do not have a government that provides basic services, such as health care, paved roads, education, and law and order, then it is less likely for citizens to show faith in government, have free and fair elections, or have any input in the political direction their country will take.

On the other hand, when people have access to basic utilities and enjoy comfortable living, it becomes easier for them to organize assemblies, express and publish their opinion, and get politically active. Poor and dysfunctional infrastructure has negative consequences on participation, skills, education, economic success and development. This assumption follows a simple public opinion that infrastructural rights are closely correlated with public capabilities and political rights. Stated differently, infrastructure is the basic element of political participation and development, as well as an element to advance human rights and freedom.

Both party leaders and policymakers in Armenia have not been able localize politics, or understand the politics of infrastructure, nor have they advanced an inward-looking strategy for development of the country. They yet have to realize that Armenian politics is not about diplomatic negotiations, it is not about power relations or presidential summits, and it is not about Diaspora organizations or individuals in their globalized role in an attempt to find the so called global vision for Armenian life. Apart from these international and diplomatic efforts, Armenian politics is all about roads, bathrooms, rest areas, livable wages, adequate houses, labor and production in the country. Politics, in other words, is about the infrastructural elements of development. People leave their country and emigrate not because of war in Artsakh, but primarily because of their deprived capabilities, because of underdeveloped conditions of the key infrastructural fundamentals.

Here, the term politics, and the interpretation of it, should have a local context. Ironically, the established tradition of political understanding and its interpretation suggest looking at the government as the primary owner of politics. In this outlook there seems to be a distorted image of politics confined within a hierarchical relationship in society. Instead, Armenian politics, I believe, becomes more significant and useful if we look at it from the public view. It is at the popular level that we see the horizontal and infrastructural relations with all-inclusive, moral-ethical, social, and cultural dimensions in which politics becomes meaningful. We look at infrastructure both as policy value and policy practice belonging to the people who ultimately can liberate themselves from constant emigration.

To meet the basic infrastructural needs of the people also suggests satisfaction of their basic socio-economic and political needs. Our national philosophy for survival and development should primarily focus on Armenia’s infrastructure. After all, the simple and the daily life of the ordinary citizens is also their politics. For them, parliamentary or presidential elections, coalitions and oppositions in the government, or diplomatic relations with other countries are distant realities and are detached from their daily living conditions and relations. Politics for the low income families is to heat their houses with wood or whatever they find because they have no heating system with natural gas. When we read news such as “40,000 people left Armenia in 2017,” or “residents of Buzhakan, a village in Armenia’s Kotayk Province, have been without natural gas since the country gained independence 26 years ago,” we cannot help but conclude that our leaders are ill-informed about politics and their ignorance about infrastructure brought us here.

Many observers and reporters point out that about seventy percent of the Armenian population is poor. About half of the population lives in apartments that are in deplorable condition and continue to deteriorate. Thus, the main political challenge is to build and develop sufficient energy insulation, improve condition of the gas, water and sewerage systems, hygienic conditions of bathrooms and kitchens, and access to drinking water.

The economic and political institutions in the country have yet to function inclusively and respond to the basic infrastructural needs of the people. That requires work with low-income families to build, renovate or improve homes that can be paid for by budgeted public policies or by affordable loans. Economic or microfinance institutions, as a development plan, can provide families with access to micro-loans to finance home repairs, improve their water, gas, and sanitation conditions. There is no reason for Armenians to be unemployed. This is what politics is all about which, in turn, builds self-resilience, improves social well-being, and more freedom in the area of political participation.

Some identify Armenians as a global nation. The identity of the global nation, however, does not correlate with the image of the state. What we, in fact, have today is an elitist government, or a globalized government very distant from grievances of ordinary people. A globalized government that is very distant from politics.

Razmig B. Shirinian is a Professor of Political Science at the College of the Canyons.


Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.


  1. hye said:

    they are put in there to serve Russia, and they are doing a good job for Russia unfortunately.

    • Raffi said:

      Every country serves a superpower, and Armenia have NO other choice but to serve Russia.

  2. Gassia Deuvletian said:

    Couldn’t been analysed better….bravo! I wish policy makers can read and show willingness to implement before it’s too late.

  3. Antoine S. Terjanian said:

    Thank you, Professor Shirinian, for sharing your theories and knowledge.
    Since Armenia imports its natural gas, and does so through unreliable channels, would you consider a suggestion to equip these people in hard-to-reach villages with solar energy instead?
    You may know that we are now producing solar panels in Armenia.
    I would also encourage you to be involved, personally, in helping Armenia develop, whichever way you feel is appropriate.

  4. Nigol Abrahamian said:

    Reading your article I could have used “United States” (population of 330 M) instead of the word Armenia (3 m), not even 1%. This is how I would go on doing it, 26 years old compared to where you live Armenia is a new born country with no natural resources and surrounded by enemies. Do we have a choice but to be a state puppet of Russia. I do admit, we have crooked politicians so do you corporations control yours. It must have been a while since you were in Armenia. Yerevan and the surrounding area where more then half the population live, has no pot holes uninterrupted electricity drinking water and natural gas, which by the way we import through a couple of thousand kilometres of pipes, 50% of villages have the same. Next time you are in Armenia see me and I will show you the accomplishments that we have achieved in the last 26 years, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the devastating earthquake and a deadly 4 years of war with our neighbour.
    U.S. national dept per citizen is $63,024, Armenia $2,600, maybe you should start to worry not me.

    • Raffi Mouchmouchian said:

      You do not judge a country by looking at its capital, Nigol. Poverty rates in Armenia are much higher than the U.S. 70% of Armenians in Armenia, not Yerevan, are poor.

  5. Areg Gharabegian said:

    Dear Razmik,

    Clearly you are not up-to-date about situation in Armenia. As you know I was in Armenia for one year working as advisor to the Minister of Nature Protection. I am back in LA now, but will be returning soon. What you are portraying as Armenia is NOT the place I have been living. I suggest you come to Armenia, live there for a while, and then you will be in a much better position to write about it.

    FYI, last year our ministry got a grant for $20,000,000 to do exactly what you are suggesting about energy efficiency. We are just starting another project for $27,000,000 to improve agricultural situation in villages and provide micro loans as you are demanding. Armenia does not have shortage of electricity and it is selling electricity to Iran. Presently all four of our neighbors have shortage of electricity, including Iran and Turkey. USAID has provided large sums and our ministry is now improving water wells in Ararat Valley and installing on-line monitoring systems on them. We are working to get a $25,000,000 grant/loan to reduce pressures on forests by providing solar systems and efficient heaters among other things to villages near forests. Few months ago we got another $1,000,000 to get prepared for putting up forest fires. These are just few of projects in one ministry. Believe me there are much more and one can easily find info about them, if one is willing.

    By living in Armenia I have concluded that Armenians in Armenia have no idea what the Diaspora is and Armenians living in Diaspora (besides the ones from Armenia) have no clue what Armenia is. This is sad, but is the reality. Republic of Armenia is an infant and she needs all the help but where are Diaspora Armenians? Why are not they coming to Armenia and help? It is easy to seat in comfort of your house in LA and do Armenia bashing, but it is difficult to be in Armenia and do real work.

    We last our Kingdome many centuries ago, then we lost the first republic after two years, we do not have luxury of loosing this republic; therefore, we need all hand on deck, pull up your sleeves, get into the trenches, and let us all together build an Armenia that next generations can enjoy it and be proud of it.


    • Mimi said:

      I am a second generation Armenian-American living in California. Retired now and have always felt the pull of our motherland but have not yet been there. How can I help?