Armenian Snap

Garen Yegparian
Garen Yegparian

Garen Yegparian

BY GAREN YEGPARIAN

On December 9, the Republic of Armenia will go hold its first “snap” parliamentary elections. The meaning of this may be known to some readers. But, most in the U.S. will not have the intimate knowledge of it that those who live in countries with parliamentary systems have.

Instead of holding an election on a regularly scheduled interval, a snap election happens when a government “falls” – that is for some reason loses support. This took place in the RoA a few weeks ago. It was quite deliberate and coordinated among the four parties currently in the parliament. Given the particulars of the country’s constitution, the prime minister had to resign, two efforts to elect a new PM had to be made by parliament and fail, and those two failures led to the dissolution of parliament and the calling of new elections. Meanwhile, the previous PM continues in a caretaker capacity.

The election formal election period is very short, less than two weeks, but of course all those participating have been preparing for longer than that. Nine parties and two alliances (groupings of smaller parties) are fielding candidates. We are now in the heat of the election.

To get into parliament, a party or alliance must receive at least 5% of the vote. This is where it gets complicated because there are two parallel tracks that parties in the election can and do pursue. Each party or alliance submits a prioritized list of candidates. Depending on how many votes a party/alliance gets, it will be apportioned a corresponding number of seats. Candidates starting with the first one on the party/alliance list will be seated accordingly. Remember that people cast their votes for a party/alliance not a person. That’s the first track. The second track is geographical and individual based. A party/alliance might have multiple candidates in a “marz” (province). These candidates vie not just against other parties/alliances members but also against one another. Whoever wins in that jurisdiction gets into parliament. But the votes they get also count towards their party/alliances overall vote tally in trying to break that 5% threshold and maximize the number of seats in parliament. Removing this “rating” system (as it’s been dubbed) was one of the proposed reforms that failed to pass by just one vote.

So now the election is in full swing. The campaigns are attacking one another and coming up with advertising. Some of the Republican Party’s ads have drawn much derision. Remarks by one of Pashinyan’s cohort about the relative importance of the Spring uprising that toppled Serzh Sarkisian and the liberation of Artsakh have garnered harsh criticism, even from Stepanakert. Of course Pashinyan hit back telling them to stay out of Armenia’s business (a worrisome mindset reflecting a sentiment that sees Artsakhtsees as “others”). In turn, Pashinyan has been criticized by the ARF for favoring the extensive powers granted by the new constitution to the prime minister, since he had opposed them prior to taking office. There’s rich irony on both sides of this last kerfuffle since it is the ARF that spearheaded the major constitutional change that ushered in the parliamentary system now in place, while Pashinyan was among those opposed to the changes.

It’s good to see what looks like a normal election campaign going on with all factions trumpeting their upsides and their opponents’ downsides. Reports of some of the old-style arm twisting using the levers of state by the current regime have been heard.

Given what I’ve read, some of the election chatter I’ve heard, and the last half year’s developments, it seems that Pashinyan will win big. He will do especially well in Yerevan, but less so in areas outside the capital. I won’t hazard a guess as to whether he will be capped by the constitutional requirement that at least one-third of parliament be composed of opposition forces. This is a way of guaranteeing that minority political forces do not become totally excluded from the country’s political discourse.

As to my party’s chances, I think the ARF faces a steep uphill climb in this election. But, it also seems like the most energetic campaign yet is being run by the ARF.

It would be interesting to hear everyone else’s predictions about this election.

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

2 Comments

  1. Jacque said:

    My prediction.
    Pashinian’s party will get at least 65% since Yerevan holds most votes.
    Republicans will get 7%
    ARF will get 4% but it would pass the 5% threshold with other minorities.
    The rest of the vote will be divided between the other parties , mostly going to tserougian party.
    I wish the ARF the best of luck.

  2. Artin said:

    Pashinian will most likely win, gago’s party will probably get the 2nd largest share of votes & then rest split between the others. I wish the ARF luck. I truly do feel that nationalism, national pride & Diasporan lobbying for Armenia’s interests, not just financial donations, is the only Course for Armenia. We MUST create an Armenia that is built only for Armenians, where EVERY Armenian will not only be able to live, but thrive. Look at Israel as an example. Granted they get BILLIONS in US free aid every year, but still the idea of supporting your homeland, investing your time, money, educating others, building up basic infrastructure & promoting self sufficiency is NEVER a bad idea. If Armenia is to survive, it MUST find a way to get Armenians to repatriate a large number of Armenians back to Armenia, to bring their money, talent & knowledge with them. This will ONLY happen if they can live in a nation that cares about them & their future. That means good jobs, good pay, good healthcare & education provided by the government & politicians that are motivated out of pure love of country rather than money. Armenia cannot become some laizze-faire capitalist state nor can it be another North Korea. It must find the middle ground both economically & geopolitically. We need Russia but we should approach Iran & China. We cant rely on the US or the EU BUT that doesn’t mean we should turn a blind eye to promoting our causes within those nations.

*

Top