What Unifies Us as A Nation

Young Armenians waving the tri-color in Yerevan
Young Armenians waving the tri-color in Yerevan

Young Armenians waving the tri-color in Yerevan

BY STEVEN J. DER-HAROUTUNIAN

The recent call for replacing the national anthem, Mer Hairenik, with the former Soviet Armenia anthem can only be viewed as an attempt to drive a wedge between our people when in fact the purpose of the revolution was to unify our nation.

When the obvious why is asked, we are given some dribble about musicality, why of course citing the trivial and impertinent armchair criticisms of some otherwise respected musicologists as the basis. While I will defer to others to scientifically debate the merit of one tune over another an anthem on the other hand cannot simply be judge in that manner. A National anthem doesn’t exist in a vacuum.

How an anthem can be solely measured by its musical quality 100 years after its adoption is shocking to the conscious of most of our nation who has answered the call of that anthem and its flag and all those symbols which represent Armenia and give character to the long struggle of the Armenian nation for its freedom and independence.

That anthem captures the sacrifice made by countless patriotic men women and children in that struggle for independence whether that was standing on the front at Saradarabad in 1918, standing in a hall in Davenport Iowa in 1946, on the cliffs of Shoushi in 1992 or holding onto the faith as a family in the darkest days in the early 1990s and standing firm on their small plot of land and choosing to stay without food, warmth and often without adequate shelter and tough it out as Armenians on their ancestral land rather than to leave for the chance of a better life in Russia, Europe or America as thousands of others did.

That anthem tells their story. A sacred story. A story of faith, struggle for freedom to live and if necessary die as Armenians for Armenia rather than to live and then to disappear among other nations un-moored to their land and lost like flotsam in the sea.

That is what is so confusing about this whole artificial controversy. Why is the musicality of the anthem now being challenged and called for replacing? Who are these adventurist political figures that today call for that?

Mer Hairenik does not need to win a Grammy award or be at the top of a charts to be our anthem. Its musicality is judged by what is represents and that is first and foremost freedom. No alternative song blessed by those who took away that freedom and held Armenia as a vassal state in their empire can ever ever be our anthem no matter how pleasant a rhythm and lyrics it have upon the ear, it is an insult to the heart and soul of our freedom and independence and what was spent and it spent to keep it in blood, sweat and treasure.

Which brings us to the question: Why would anyone raise this issue today?

When the Prime Minister has stated that repatriation, economic investment and military preparedness are the goals of this new government, how does replacing a 100-year-old national anthem accomplish any of those? In fact all this toxic divisive proposal has done is divide our nation, when in fact we should be standing united to face the real challenges our country faces such as population loss, unemployment and under employment, economic dependence and exploitation, poverty, inadequate healthcare and the need for a vigilant defense.

Today we as a nation look to leaders who will address those existential threats to Armenia and in doing so once again unify us as a nation. Mer Hairneik is one of the key symbols that does that.

Our nation looks to the Armenian government to responsibly act to unify us a nation not allow for dangerous opportunists to divide us.

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

6 Comments

  1. State of Emergency said:

    The fact of the matter and the matter of the fact is that Soviet indoctrinated anti-ARF Armenians are not intelligent enough to comprehend the history and meaning behind the national anthem. First off, they are against anything ARF related, but more importantly, they are self absorbed, frivolous, and void of Armenian history, values, or traditions. They’ll sell their souls to the highest bidder for their mindless quests: as evident with post independence history.

  2. Ari said:

    Absolutely correct in stating that Mer Hairneik is one of the key symbols unifying our nation, both within and outside Armenia. I will go one step further, when I was learning the lyrics of our national anthem, I thought to myself, why the fatherland is only calling upon his sons to defend the freedom. Until I understood that the tear drenched flag swen during the sleepless nights is the work of a woman. How gender inclusive and patriotic, and how beautiful. This anthem is represents the sad history and struggles of our nation and must be preserved at all costs.

    We must not allow the Russified Armenians (our any other domestic enemies) change this national treasure.

  3. ominac said:

    Nothing divides us more then a corrupt government, now that one is getting fixed, why should i listen to Italian music, specially when i have an alternative that is way better. So what we heard it for 30 years, thats not good reason to listen to this foreign music in the next thousand years.

  4. Krikor said:

    Armenia has more important issues to deal with at this moment. Mer Hairenik was, is, and has to remain our national anthem

  5. ardachece barseghian said:

    Il existe encore et encore fortement cette esprit de soumission et de reniement de notre histoire nationale. Cet état d’esprit est la raison des craintes émises par les Etats et leurs investisseurs vers l’Arménie. Exemple a l’entrée du musée de Dilidjan les responsable et le maire arbore avec fierté la statut de lenine aux visiteurs étrangers comme si en Allemagne on exposait la statue d’hitler, J’ai vu sur le bureau d’un chef de service de la police la statue de lenine. Evidemment je ne suis pas reste indifférent d’autant que ce type d’incultes pro soviétique considèrent qu’il fait parti de l’histoire de l’Arménie en effet pour avoir vendu notre peuple aux turcs. Que peut faire M. Pachinyan face a ce type de citoyen qui de plus considèrent comme valeur nationale de s’enivrer a la moindre occasion, de se gaver de khorovadz, de … Alors c’est honteux de discuter de la musicalité de notre saint Hymne

  6. ardachece barseghian said:

    IM GARDZIG : There is still and still pitchblende this spirit of submission and denial of our national history. This mindset is the reason for the fears expressed by the States and their investors towards Armenia. Example at the entrance of the Museum of Dilijan the responsible and the mayor proudly displays the status of Lenin to foreign visitors as if in Germany the statue of Hitler was exposed, I saw on the desk of a chief of Police department the statue of Lenin. Obviously I am not still indifferent as this type of Soviet Pro cultists consider it to be part of the history of Armenia indeed for having sold our people to the Turks. What could Mr. Pachinyan have to do with this type of citizen who moreover consider it a national value to get drunk at the slightest opportunity, to gorge himself on Khorovadz,… So it’s shameful to talk. Of the musicality of our holy Hymn

*

Top