Pashinyan Accused of Inciting Violence Against Opposition Lawmakers

brawl
A brawl broke out on Friday between pro-government and opposition members of the Armenian parliament

A brawl broke out on Friday between pro-government and opposition members of the Armenian parliament

YEREVAN (Azatutyun.am)—A major opposition party has accused Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan of condoning and inciting violent attacks on its members following an ugly brawl that disrupted a session of Armenia’s parliament on Friday.

The brawl broke out in Pashinyan’s presence during a speech delivered by Edmon Marukyan, the leader of the Bright Armenia Party, on the parliament floor. Marukyan lambasted pro-government parliamentarians and was punched by one of them before dozens of other lawmakers representing the Bright Armenia Party and Pashinyan’s My Step bloc joined in the resulting melee.

Addressing the National Assembly later on Friday, Pashinyan deplored the violence but effectively blamed it on Marukyan’s party. He said that his political allies should not have succumbed to what he described as a Bright Armenia Party “provocation” aimed at discrediting the Armenian government.

The prime minister went on brand Marukyan’s party as “parliamentary servants” of former Presidents Serzh Sarkisian and Robert Kocharian.

In a statement issued on Monday, the Bright Armenia Party condemned Pashinyan’s speech, saying that he thereby “justified, legitimized and encouraged” violence against his political opponents.

“The incident showed that it took the revolutionary prime minister only two years to completely dismantle and demolish the ideas, values and principles declared by that revolution,” it said, referring to the 2018 protest movement that toppled Sarkisian and brought Pashinyan to power.

The Bright Armenia Party, which is one of the two opposition parties represented in the current National Assembly, also strongly denied having ties to Armenia’s former rulers. “The prime minister is deliberately labeling Bright Armenia as representatives of the ‘former regime’ in order to justify the hooligan behavior of his deputies in the eyes of his supporters,” it charged.

“What is more, My Step members portray all of their opponents and critics as enemies of the state and the people and anti-state elements who can be legitimately assaulted,” added the Bright Armenia Party statement. It claimed that this “totalitarian mindset” could eventually lead to authoritarian rule in Armenia.

In a weekend video address live-streamed on Facebook, Marukyan similarly accused Pashinyan of “encouraging” his loyalists to assault opposition figures. “This speech [by Pashinyan] demonstrated that their clock is ticking,” he added.

The brawl occurred one day after Pashinyan and Marukyan held an unexpected one-on-one meeting in the parliament building. The opposition leader claimed afterwards that they only discussed recent developments in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Pashinyan said in his parliament speech, however, that they also spoke about domestic political issues. He said he told Marukyan that he has “grounds to suspect that you and your activities are an integral part of a plan to use psychological, moral and, ultimately, physical violence” against Armenia’s political leadership and its allies.

In his Facebook transmission, Marukyan admitted that Pashinyan alleged possible ties between the Bright Armenia Party and the former regime during their conversation. He suggested that the premier might have been angered by his remark that Armenia’s next government will be formed by the Bright Armenia Party.

Hrachya Hakobyan, a My Step lawmaker, accused the Bright Armenia Party leader of lying about the agenda of Thursday’s meeting with Pashinyan. Hakobyan, who is also Pashinyan’s brother-in-law, defended the prime minister’s and the parliament majority’s stance on Friday’s incident.

Levon Barseghyan, a veteran civic activist who actively participated in the 2018 “Velvet Revolution,” said, meanwhile, no “provocation” can justify the violent response to Marukyan. He said that Sasun Mikaelyan, the My Step deputy who was the first throw a punch, must be “held accountable.”

Barseghyan also argued: “The same opposition people formed, together with Nikol Pashinyan, the opposition in the [former] parliament and they also harshly criticized the [former ruling] Republican Party.”

Pashinyan and Marukyan used to co-head the Yelk bloc that challenged Armenia’s former leadership. The bloc fell apart after Marukyan and his party refused to join mass protests launched by Pashinyan in April 2018 against Sarkisian’s attempt to extend his decade-long rule.

Meanwhile, Mikaelian remained unrepentant and blamed Marukyan for the brawl on Monday. He also dismissed calls for his resignation from the parliament. He said he will quit only if Marukyan does the same.

“It was [Marukyan’s] fault,” declared the 62-year-old veteran of the Nagorno-Karabakh war. “If he’s man enough to hand his mandate I’ll hand mine too.”

A senior member of Marukyan’s Bright Armenia Party, Gevorg Gorgisyan, dismissed the offer as “nonsense.” “It’s like catching a robber and the victim of a robbery and prosecuting them on the same charge,” he said.

Mikaelyan also set another condition. He demanded an apology from Marukyan’s younger brother Edgar who insulted him in a Facebook post which was subsequently deleted by the latter.
“Young man, your mother is sacred for me, but if you don’t apologize for what you said … you all know who I am, my actions, my words, and nothing good will await you,” Mikaelyan warned in the parliament.

Gorgisyan condemned the warning as a threat of fresh violence. He said that unlike Edgar Marukyan, Mikaelyan is a state official and must behave accordingly. “The National Assembly is not the place for a language of threats,” Gorgisyan told RFE/RL’s Armenian service.

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

3 Comments

  1. Vram said:

    If punching an opposition member (while the Parliament is in televised session) is an expression of “Love and Harmony” by the leaders of the “Velvety Revolution”, one wonders what other means of expression could be used if the “Velvety Revolution”‘s motto was “Glove and Tyranny”…

  2. Dr. Hermon Mihranian said:

    This is what I am constantly saying. Pashinyan is not the right man for Armenia. He is only trying to get rid of his opponents and the Armenian Church. In fact he is Soros puppet.

  3. Barséghian Ardachèce said:

    When for many years I have been constantly criticizing the so-called armed policies that cannot emerge from this “neo-Soviet” mindset with all the consequences of economic, social and civil aggressions, up to the penal against Society and its citizens, you have a demonstration of it with this political class that does not know how to think in order to initiate structural reforms. For 30 years we have seen some plunder the country in a neo-Soviet concept, out of all national consideration, of economic and political feodalites, others today, full of good intentions that pretend to be self-sufficient, refusing the outstretched hand of the diaspora, I say the “diaspora” to participate directly in the government at the ratings of the Prime Minister. The examples of serious failures are numerous in strategic terms especially with agriculture, rural society with its 1000 villages, 1000 corrupting little princes and health with a corrupt medical body unmoved to the citizens other of the mafia, refusing to establish general social guarantees, in order to enrich itself in the demean and absolute inhumanity by blackmail. For quite 30 years I have been offering solutions for cooperation with concrete experiences on the ground, followed, verified and agreed as exemplary by the experts of the French and European institutions, they are unaware despite the undegree that successive Ministers are pushing rural populations into a despicable structure pushing for exodus. So, intellectuals and specialists of all kinds of the diaspora encourage or even push the policies of the major Parties to move beyond the stage of criticism and financial aid so that a representatives body can be born that can INTERVENIR, IMPOSER a real participatory contribution to the POLITICS at the ratings of this 1st Minister full of good will to initiate structural reforms including judicial and restructure the political orientations. The task is immense and exceeds the skills and experiences of the country. My point of view

*

Top