National Assembly Brawl Exposes the Embarrassing

brawl
A brawl broke out on Friday between pro-government and opposition members of the Armenian parliament

A brawl broke out on Friday between pro-government and opposition members of the Armenian parliament

BY HAIG KAYSERIAN

The recent incident in Armenia’s National Assembly was embarrassing.

Punches being thrown in politics is not a new thing, and it isn’t even exclusive to one part of the world – I recently read that Robert Hughes missed Tony Abbott’s head with an attempted king hit during the Republic v Monarchy debates in Australia. There have been similar incidents of coming to blows in democracies including the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, South Korea and elsewhere also.

However for a country that is trying to recover from nearly three decades of post-Soviet coma – with a dose of revolution mixed with populism, while surrounded by aggressive neighbors, and with significant social and economic challenges – this incident marks a setback for what the people set out to achieve in April-May 2018.

The incident itself may seem minor in isolation, but it comes hot on the heels of another scuffle outside Parliament where a high-ranking government Member of the National Assembly punched an extra-parliamentary opposition activist in the streets of Yerevan. And what these incidents expose is the real setback.

  1. They expose that there are certain people who were elected to the Parliament that should simply not be there. They rode on the coattails of the leader of the revolution, and were only elected because of his endorsement.
  2. Some of these more peripheral revolutionaries have proven very effective. Others – including a few loitering in the executive branch of government – have proven they lack the temperament, the know-how, the culture and the ability to govern.
  3. This latter group are a combination of people who have not been able to let go of the rear view mirror – focusing on vendettas and vengeance, and of people who have consciously worked to bugger up the revolution’s opportunity to unite the country – resorting to divisive (and false) policy priorities such as changing the country’s anthem or her coat of arms.
  4. If some of these efforts were placed in social and economic reforms, attracting migration and women’s and minority rights, there would be greater headway being made by Yerevan.

It would be ignorant to suggest there haven’t been any improvements from a past the country should never look back to, particularly in eradicating corruption, increasing freedoms and tightening up foreign policy – most specifically the Foreign Ministry’s recent messaging, moving Yerevan away from the dreaded Madrid Principles being proposed by world powers, which would threaten the rights to self-determination of the Republic of Artsakh.

This brings us to the Opposition to the government, those within the parliament and outside. An objective political scientist will quickly adjudicate that those that are taking poll advantages from government missteps are those powers who are disassociated from the previous regime. Make no mistake, there is no appetite in Armenia for any apologists or nostalgists of what was 20 years of unrepresentative polity that has been outwardly rejected by the people.

This requires any power that wants to position itself as a genuine contender to be an alternative force to be honest with itself and to the public – to humbly admit to past wrongdoings, to change their faces and messaging from anything that would hint they haven’t learned from said past, and to show they have heard the loud and clear message from the electorate. This requires them to exit their echo-chambers that scream of relevance deprivation.

Otherwise, let it be a punch-up in Parliament or the current government’s missteps in social, economic or security policies, any change that will one day come will not include them in the mix of the thoughts of the people. The people will forever remember their victory in April-May 2018, when most importantly, they took back their right to a voice in their future.

Therefore, when they choose to dedicate that voice elsewhere, it will be the honest, the more respectful and the most trustworthy who will be deemed worthy and earn the people’s trust.

In concluding, there is a responsibility on the government to clean up its backyard to prevent similar embarrassments to those recently witnessed, step away from false policy agendas and unite the electorate. There is also an obligation on the rest of the country’s political hopefuls to get serious and step onto the side of the people.

After all, in a democracy, the people represent the only side that really matters.

Haig Kayserian is the Executive Director of the Armenian National Committee of Australia, with a Bachelors in Media & Cultural Studies (Macquarie University) and is currently completing his Masters in Politics & Policy (Deakin University). His background is in running technology companies.

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

6 Comments

  1. GB said:

    Some older politicians still have Soviet mentality and they won’t fit with today’s civilized politicians. They all should resign or force them to resign. This is not acceptable for Armenian Nation of the world!

  2. Barséghian Ardachèce said:

    National and parliamentary democracy requires I say well requires that when there is an elected power there must be one or more counter-power, free expression and different points of view. The power must respect, hear or even adopt the opinions of common sense HORS the “Party” my step is under the absolute authority of the Prime Minister and President of Parliament and all those who dare to oppose are systematically denounced as the reaction, against “revolutionary” with low attacks, insults and the same kind as the Stalinist era, it lacks the deportation to the gulag. Mr. Pachinyan quickly forgot the period or as an opponent he was imprisoned. A significant number of personal pietres, opportunistic without principle by profession have infiltrated Parliament. Finally, a final case, the honourable combatant Mikaelyan should be stationed in an Army department not in Parliament uttering remarks that he could address to our enemies. Thus from personal insults to threats and part taken against any opponent or opponent the President of the Assembly the “Party” becomes progessively the undisputed authoritarian Single Party and we left for 30 years, before the “republicans” today “My Pas”. Democracy in politics is the ability to sustain constructive opposition.

  3. sylva portoian,MD said:

    One person …named Edmon…
    Can spoil the beauty of an Honest Parliament …
    Only one person can do
    He has so many deep hates in his heart …
    I don’t know why …!!!
    No one hates him
    But he hates himself …
    To start such an illogical prime …

    Let him watch himself …
    And insult himself for what he did …
    He left his respectful chair
    To reach down and hit an honest old man
    He could not cover his hate …to his parliament … and
    all members who were elected through democratic way …
    He wanted to show the world …
    That the Parliament members are dishonest …
    He was the only one, did not represent 80% of the populace …
    He spoiled his name …
    But can he spoil … the National Armenian assembly …???

    I like to ask him face to face …
    Telling him you failed …
    You put your name in a dirty mud …
    No one can clean that… neither you …
    Will stay in your history even after you sigh
    What a shame…

    Sylva~MD~POETRY
    May 14, 2020
    Written Instantly …

  4. sylva portoian,MD said:

    We want to thank Mr. Haig Kayserian,
    For his honest article …
    All Armenians are united against any man who wants
    to spoil the name of our Armenian parliaments…

  5. Barséghian Ardachèce said:

    Post-Soviet Armenia does not come an exit from its old habits that have become intangible rules, such as the cult of the Single Party, the unique Neo-Stalian thinker. So for example I find myself in a business where customers were fighting at the National Assembly away from national issues but revived the conversation about personal attacks stigmatizing the opposition of all words and evils. I dare to pronounce 2 words I also was assaulted “don’t touch Pachinyan” which was not my point. We are back to the all-time terrorizing political experience of the Republic Party who have tyrannized the people by all the most vile means. I persist and sign the outcome is that the retired citizens of the diaspora imbued with democratic culture, respect for the republican rules, the state administering the interests of the Nation, must come to the country, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year to understand the depth of post-Soviet evil and exchange so that society hears and sees another approach.

*

Top