Armenia Reticent On New Karabakh Peace Plan

YEREVAN (RFE/RL)—Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian on Thursday refrained from publicizing Armenia’s position on international mediators’ recently modified plan to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. He also denied that Azerbaijan has largely accepted the proposed peace deal.

The U.S, Russian and French co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group submitted what they call an “updated version” of the so-called Madrid Document to the conflicting parties in December and January. The Armenian government reportedly responded to it in writing last month.

Nalbandian discussed the matter with the mediators in Paris on Tuesday. He seemed to downplay the significance of the still unpublicized changes made by them in the document during a news conference in Yerevan.

Asked whether those changes are acceptable to the Armenian side, he said: “We have long said that we accept the Madrid principles as the basis of negotiations and we are continuing negotiations on the basis of the Madrid principles. The co-chairs have been submitting working proposals, and all of them are being discussed.”

In a joint statement issued late on Wednesday, the co-chairs also declined to specify whether Yerevan has accepted their modified peace proposals. They confirmed that the Paris meeting focused on “the Armenian comments on the co-chairs’ latest formulations of the Basic Principles for the peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.”

“The talks were held in a constructive spirit, and will be continued during the forthcoming travel of the Co-Chairs to Yerevan and Nagorno-Karabakh,” added the statement.

According to Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov, the updated Madrid Document is acceptable to Baku “with a number of exceptions.” “Let Armenia declare whether or not it accepts this variant so that we can decide what to do next,” he said on Monday.

Nalbandian dismissed these statements as misleading, saying that the Azerbaijani “exceptions” outweigh provisions acceptable to Baku. “When you look at statements made by them in recent days you see that there are more exceptions than things which they accept,” he said. “There are a dozen exceptions and one or two issues relating to consequences of the conflict which they accept.”

The top Armenian diplomat went on to again accuse Baku of seeking to “distort the essence of the negotiating process.” He described Baku’s statements about the framework peace plan as “just a smoke screen.”

“Azerbaijan has not been recognizing the Madrid Principles for a long time and if at last Baku has decided to take the documents as a basis for negotiations we can only welcome this fact,” Nalbandian said.

Meanwhile, Mammadyarov on Thursday rejected the idea of holding a referendum on self-determination in Nagorno-Karabakh, which is reportedly a key element of the peace formula favored by the mediators. “Under the Azerbaijani constitution, when it comes to the country’s territorial integrity, a referendum should be held in the entire territory of the republic and all of its citizens should take part in the vote,” he said, according to Regnum news agency.

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

2 Comments

  1. Lusik said:

    Edward Nalbandian found his voice in this cacophony of mal-educated “diplomats” and fast-baked “politicians”.
    Bari ert, Paron Nakharar.

  2. Lusik said:

    Asbarez,

    In my opinion it is imperative to stay focused on developments in the process of recognition of Artsakh’s Independece.

    For some reason the main energy of the process is channeled into comforting Azerbaijan. In my opinion, the legal official documents concerning independence of Artsakh should be written and submitted for approval to governments of all countries. They have to be so specific, so that even a country with a similar issue will be comfortable to act unbiased and recognize the Artsakh Free (for instance, Serbia, China …).

    In my opinion, Armenians have to show that we have energy for fighting for truth about our history and vision of our future. Because Artsakh is our hope for building further future of Armenia.

    In my opinion, our enemies – and their accomplicies, try in a “peaceful” way deprive us from memory of past and vision of future in a single process!!!

*

Top