Kosovo Ruling Applicable To Karabakh, Says Sarkisian

YEREVAN (RFE/RL)–A recent UN court ruling that upheld the legality of Kosovo’s secession from Serbia set an important precedent for the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian said on Monday.

“For us, the Kosovo precedent is important in the sense that the UN International Court of Justice (ICJ) clearly answered one question,” he said. “The question was: does a unilateral declaration of independence contradict international law or not? The answer was no, it doesn’t.”

Speaking after talks with Slovenia’s visiting President Danilo Turk, Sarkisian said although ethnic disputes around the world have their own specificities, solutions to them must be based on “the same principles.” He said the only major difference between the conflicts over Kosovo and Karabakh is that the Karabakh Armenians won de facto independence “without NATO’s support.”

“Nagorno-Karabakh is now patiently awaiting the moment when the international community will recognize its unilaterally declared independence,” Sarkisian told a joint news conference with Turk.

Turk, whose country has recognized Kosovo as an independent state, was more cautious in commenting on the ICJ ruling’s relevance to other disputes. “I think that one of the characteristics of that non-binding decision is that the court did not express itself on the issue of self-determination,” he said.

Despite repeatedly welcoming the ICJ judgment, Armenia has so far refrained from recognizing Kosovo’s independence, not least because Russia, its closest ally, is strongly opposed to that. Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian gave no indication that Yerevan may soon reconsider that stance when he met with his Kosovar counterpart, Skender Hyseni, in New York late last month.

Sarkisian also said on Monday that the Karabakh Armenians’ direct involvement in Armenian-Azerbaijani peace talks, strongly opposed by Baku, is essential for Karabakh peace. “The conflict should be resolved by solely peaceful means, without use of force or threat of use of force, in the existing negotiating format and in strict compliance with international law,” he said. “And the sooner Karabakh fully joins negotiations, the more easily we could achieve the conflict’s resolution.”

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

One Comment;

  1. CX said:

    But it wasn`t unilateral like Kosovo (although calling a separatist terrorist regime installed by NATO `unilateral` seems strange), it was Karabakh taking advantage of the exact same process and law which Azerbaijan did: Azerbaijan seceding from USSR and Karabakh by the same law separating itself from Azerbaijan. Now perhaps technically, by the terms of that law, Karabakh would have continued to be part of the USSR as long as it lasted (rather than an independent state), but it directly contradicts Baku`s hysterical mantra that Karabakh can never be separated from Azerbaijan – the very law which Azerbaijan used to implement it`s independence (e.g. equivalent to the constitutional mandate allowing for independence of Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Montenegro but not Kosovo from Yugoslavia/Serbia) simultaneously recognized that Karabakh CAN INDEED be separated from Azeri sovereignty.

*

Top