IAEA to Inspect Medzamor Plant

The Medzamor nuclear power plant

YEREVAN (EurasiaNet)—Nuclear Safety Officials in Armenia have long downplayed the potential threats posed by the aging Medzamor nuclear power plant, not far from the capital Yerevan.

At the same time, the facility has been repeatedly ranked as one of the world’s most dangerous nuclear power stations. To reassure a jittery international community in the wake of Japan’s nuclear troubles, the Armenian government has invited International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors to subject the Medzamor plant to a “stress test.”

The 12-person IAEA team is due to be in Armenia from May 15-June 1. Thirty-five-year-old Medzamor, which supplies about 40 percent of Armenia’s energy needs, has long been a target for criticism. The plant is supposed to be shut down after the construction of a new facility in 2016, but, with five years still to go to decommissioning, there is mounting pressure to ensure that no mishaps occur during this twilight phase of operations.

The IAEA tests will attempt to determine how the nuclear plant would respond to an earthquake or a tornado, said State Nuclear Safety Regulatory Committee Chairperson Ashot Martirosian. Eager to downplay possible doomsday scenarios, Martirosian underlined that the visit is “standard practice.”

“Independent experts are being invited to give their expert opinion,” he said. “After this, we will draw conclusions and introduce changes, if necessary.”

Other international experts will review procedures ranging from accident management to possible power failure. Medzamor management will submit the findings to the State Nuclear Safety Regulatory Committee by late September, Martirosian said.

In 1988, Medzamor was shut down in the wake of the 6.9-magnitude earthquake at Spitak. Even so, many Armenian nuclear safety specialists argue that the station is safer than Japan’s stricken Fukushima facility. Martirosian argued that, unlike Fukushima, Medzamor’s “two-loop steam cycle” could enable generators to release steam into the air under high temperatures without also releasing radioactive materials.

Some environmentalists, however, think such confidence is misplaced. “The attitude toward nuclear power stations has changed across the world,” commented Karine Danielian, a former minister of environmental protection who now heads the non-governmental organization For Sustainable Human Development. “Even if Japan, one of the most progressive countries, is at risk, how can one consider our own nuclear power station to be ‘safe’?”

Some of Armenia’s neighbors have asked the same question, though the identity of the country asking the question appears to follow diplomatic fault lines. Strategic allies Turkey and Azerbaijan, neither of which have diplomatic ties with Armenia, have called for Medzamor to be shut down. Medzamor is located 16 kilometers from Armenia’s border with Turkey. Georgia and Iran, however, have not yet issued such a statement.

Responding to international criticism, Armenian Energy and Natural Resources Minister Armen Movsisian told Panorama.am that “We must not take all these statements seriously.”

“We are open; anybody can come and see our nuclear power station. If any problem occurred, the international agency [IAEA] would be the first to ban its operation,” Movsisian said.

One environmental activist believes the concern about Medzamor’s continuing operations are justified. “How can we talk about security if the nuclear plant is constructed in a seismic zone, and is located in a densely populated settlement, instead of being 200 kilometers away [the distance between Fukushima and Tokyo – Ed] from residential areas?” asked Hakob Sanasarian, chairman of the Greens Union of Armenia. “It is constructed near an agricultural complex, a huge artesian reservoir, near highways and the airport.”

State Nuclear Safety Regulatory Committее Chair Martirosian dismissed Sanasarian’s objections as groundless and “for show.”

“These declarations are not based on studies,” he asserted.

Citing studies dating back to the Soviet era, Danielian, former environmental protection minister, also expressed misgivings. “As an environmentalist, I understand the existing hazards, and as a citizen, I realize we have no alternative option to the nuclear plant,” Danielian said. “[W]e just have to hope that the international review will give us an opportunity to exploit the nuclear power station safely.”

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

3 Comments

  1. Armen said:

    I think good by to our craanes is much better than good by to our people .And what about the solar?

  2. bigmoustache said:

    im POSITIVE that there are cheap solutions to that, how do golf courses or driving ranges prevent the balls from flying out and hitting people? how do they prevent a puck or baseball from hitting people? giant nets can be erected, fence like covers could be put into place..
    dont buy the propaganda that oil companies sell to the public, through media or a corrupt politian. they claim the fans cause this and that just to sow doubt…dont fall prey.
    and were talking about one area, its not going to cause an extinction of cranes. what, all the migratory cranes fly over metsamor?
    this whole world could fall apart but my first and only concern would always be for the armenian people

  3. Hripsime said:

    As an environmentalist, I strongly disagree with nuclear energy! Atomic waste are serious problem that scientists could not solve it yetll!! Remember about Chernobyl disaster during 25 years more thatn 7000000 people died!!! Yes maybe you wont believe because their stories will never be told !!! We should not forget about Chernobyl disaster or Fukushima!!!
    http://inmotion.magnumphotos.com/essay/chernobyl

*

Top