Congress Urges Turkey to Return Churches: First Successful Attempt at Restitution

Harut Sassounian


Turkey suffered a major setback last week when the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved a landmark resolution calling on the Turkish government to return over 2,000 confiscated Christian churches and other properties “to their rightful owners.”

 This victory is particularly significant as it comes at a time when Turkey is said to be at the apex of its power both regionally and internationally. Yet, despite its considerable political and economic clout, neither the Turkish regime nor its high-powered lobbyists could openly oppose a congressional resolution intended to protect the religious rights of Christian minorities in Turkey. This is the reason why, when the resolution was first submitted to the House Foreign Affairs Committee on July 20, as an amendment to the State Department’s Foreign Relations Authorization Act, it was easily adopted by a vote of 43-1.

 Just before the resolution came up for a vote on the House floor on December 13, the State Department, at Turkey’s request, made discreet but ultimately futile efforts to derail it. Turkish-American groups also unsuccessfully lobbied against the resolution. Neither the House Republican majority nor the Democratic minority heeded their denialist demands. The strong bipartisan consensus paved the way for the resolution to overcome the hurdle of needing over two-thirds of the House votes for passage, since the motion was presented under a special parliamentary procedure known as the Suspension Calendar.

 The Turkish government and its high-priced lobbying firms were greatly embarrassed when only one member of Congress rose on the House floor to speak and vote against the resolution. Even then, Cong. Ed Whitfield (R-KY), a co-chair of the Congressional Caucus on Turkey, readily acknowledged that not “very many people would oppose” this bill! He then added: “The mere fact that the resolution is being introduced would leave an objective observer with the intent (sic) opinion that religious freedom is being systematically denied in Turkey!” After rambling on for a few more minutes and running out of things to say, Cong. Whitfield yielded the balance of his time to his opponents — the supporters of the resolution!

After such a devastating defeat, the Turkish Foreign Ministry did not have much to say, except to express its disappointment. This is standard Turkish practice — initially

applying heavy pressure and making threats to prevent an unfavorable decision, and after losing the vote, dismissing the bill as being unimportant, in order to hide their embarrassing failure. If the Turkish government did not think the bill was important, why did it turn the world upside down in trying to defeat it?

 In attempting to fool the unsuspecting public, Turkish officials claimed that the resolution was merely adopted by two to one vote, without explaining that during voice votes, most House members are not usually in the Chamber. Once the leadership of the two parties comes to an agreement on an issue, only a handful of members are then required to adopt the bill. The real question that Turkish authorities must answer is why only one Congressman out of 435 voted against the resolution? This episode demonstrates that the new Ottoman emperor has no clothes!

 Even though this resolution is not binding, unless the Senate also adopts it and the President signs it into law, it is still a significant breakthrough for all Christian minorities in Turkey whose properties have been confiscated for decades. Encouraged by this positive development, the Armenian, Assyrian, and Greek communities will continue their active collaboration to pressure Turkey to restore their historic rights.

 For Armenians worldwide, this is the first time that the U.S. Congress has demanded restitution from Turkey, rather than mere recognition of the Genocide. This resolution could serve as an impetus for other countries and international organizations to follow suit, demanding the restoration of property rights in Turkey. Henceforth, the Turkish government has to be much more cautious when trampling on these rights, knowing full well that the international community is keeping a watchful eye on its recurring violations.

  The successful passage of this bill will energize Armenians around the world to continue the struggle for restitution of their losses during the Genocide. Regrettably, no clergyman or official in Armenia has said a single word on this important issue, as if the fate of Armenian churches in Turkey is of no interest to them! Wouldn’t it be in Armenians’ best interest if Armenia joined with the Diaspora to seek restitution, particularly in view of Pres. Sargsyan’s recent declaration in Marseille, France, demanding “justice” from Turkey?

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.


  1. Stew said:

    First of all, it’s non-binding and has no legal “teeth’! It’s symbolic and passed when there were hardly any congresspeopel in the chamber! Secondly, even if it were ever to become “legal” (assuming it got past the Senate AND the President signed it), so what? Who would dare try to enforce it? Which country would risk a war to appease…Armenians? Get real already! You people keep living in a non-stop fantasy world!

    • Avery said:

      Turk-oglu Stewie:

      Your Turk leadership knows the dangers that lurk below the surface of Bills such a the “Return Churches” legislation. If it meant no danger to Turkey, Turkish leadership would not pull all stops to try to defeat it.

      There will be no big bang: it will be “death by a thousand cuts” for Turkey. Bills such as this are one of those cuts. There is lots more to come. Turks know what is coming around the corner. That’s why they have gone bonkers over the French bill. A bill here, a bill there: it’s like the Gulliver story; one or two strings won’t make a difference. But hundreds will tie Turkey down so tight, that it will have to do something drastic.

      That’s what the West is preparing for: to administer the Coup de Grâce.

    • Basil said:

      Do you consider the Gayssot-law in France to have legal “teeth”? I mean, it hasn’t passed the Senate yet, and still your president, lideri Erdogan, is kind of upset, least to say? How come, I mean, even if everybody would think in war/not-war dimensions like you do, since they wouldn’t risk a war in order to appease… Armenians, why the fuss? The calling back the ambassador, the stupid accusations and the what have you.. weird. However, you continue to miniscule and mock and see what happens at the very end.

  2. Harut Sassounian said:

    To the person (I presume) with the fake name of STEW (why are you hiding your identity? Are you ashamed of what you wrote?), please read again the following sentence of my column which also applies to you: “This is standard Turkish practice — initially applying heavy pressure and making threats to prevent an unfavorable decision, and after losing the vote, dismissing the bill as being unimportant, in order to hide their embarrassing failure. If the Turkish government did not think the bill was important, why did it turn the world upside down in trying to defeat it?” Sour grapes!

  3. Wilson Petros said:

    God bless the Assyrians and the Armenians one day we will get back all our churches and our land back
    It shall be done