ANCA: Ten Questions For Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton

Ken Hachikian

WASHINGTON—Armenian National Committee of America Chairman Ken Hachikian posed ten questions to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton regarding U.S. policy on the Armenian Genocide, in his February 9 letter to the Department of State expressing the Armenian American community’s outrage over her recent dismissal of this crime as “a matter of historical debate.”

The Secretary’s factually inaccurate description was made during a January 26 publicly broadcast town hall meeting for State Department employees. At this event, in response to questions regarding the Administration’s refusal to recognize the Armenian Genocide, she stated: “this has always been viewed, and I think properly so, as a matter of historical debate.” Her remarks, which sparked outrage among Armenians worldwide, was described, in a recent Congressional letter circulated by Congressmen Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Robert Dold (R-IL) as “a position much closer to that of the Turkish government than that of any other senior U.S. diplomat in recent memory.”

These two legislators, the lead authors of H.Res.304, the Armenian Genocide Resolution, are currently collecting signatures on a letter formally calling upon the Secretary to disavow her remarks. Interested constituents can contact their U.S. Representative to cosign that letter by sending a free ANCA Webmail.

The ANCA’s six-page letter features ten direct questions to the Secretary from ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian about this and prior Administrations’ century long failed policy of attempting to appease Ankara by compromising America’s stand on a fundamental issue of human rights. Hachikian explained that: “Honest and open responses to these questions, in addition to bringing a badly needed measure of transparency to American policy on the Armenian Genocide, would also serve as a meaningful foundation for a reasoned discourse among government and civil society stakeholders about ending the era of the United States’ complicity in Turkey’s denials.” He added that: “More broadly, full and formal recognition of this crime – representing, as it would, a very public rejection of Ankara’s efforts to impose a gag-rule on America – would represent a meaningful step toward stopping the worldwide cycle of genocide that continues to plague humanity.”

The complete text of the ANCA letter, including all ten questions for Secretary Clinton, is provided below.

February 9, 2012

The Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street N.W.
Washington, DC 20520

Dear Secretary Clinton:

I am writing, on behalf of Armenian Americans and human rights and genocide prevention advocates from across the United States to register our most serious protest against your inaccurate and deeply offensive recent statement mischaracterizing the Armenian Genocide as a “historical debate.” I refer specifically to your appearance at the State Department’s Town Hall meeting on the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, on January 26, 2012, during which, in response to a question about the State Department’s refusal to recognize the Armenian Genocide, you stated, “this has always been viewed, and I think properly so, as a matter of historical debate.”

We are outraged that you have called into question the veracity of the Armenian Genocide, all the more so given your record in the U.S. Senate of having formally encouraged President George W. Bush on numerous occasions to recognize the Armenian Genocide, a crime that you have described, in writing, as “a clear case of genocide.” Your recent claim is both factually inaccurate and morally offensive. It is, quite simply, disingenuous of you to attempt to hide this Administration’s surrender to Turkey’s denials behind a hollow appeal to historians. As President Barack Obama, Vice President Joseph Biden, and you stated multiple times before the start of this Administration, and as the International Association of Genocide Scholars has unanimously affirmed, the Armenian Genocide is a matter of settled history. Your shameful suggestion, that further study is needed to determine whether the Armenian Genocide was in fact a genocide, only emboldens Ankara’s efforts to derail the civil society movement toward a truthful and just resolution of this crime.

The Obama-Biden Administration – which came into office led by a President, a Vice President and a Secretary of State, all with both long records and public promises in support of American recognition of the Armenian Genocide – saw the President, within months, prominently breaking his solemn covenant with American voters, a clear and willful breach of trust, followed shortly thereafter by the Administration’s pressure to block even Congressional commemoration of this crime.

Today, after having helped Turkey enforce its Armenian Genocide gag-rule on America, largely through our State Department’s ill-advised support for the Ankara-inspired Protocols, this Administration, as regrettably illustrated by your recent comments, has gone beyond simple complicity in Ankara’s campaign to erase the memory of this atrocity. Your statement is intellectually dishonest and, all too clearly, echoes the Turkish government’s outright denials, a shameful position that represents a grave offense to the moral values of the American people.

Having addressed a broad range of concerns on this matter in considerable detail in our previous correspondence to you, I will, today, simply submit a formal request that you immediately lead a fundamental review of this and prior Administrations’ century long failed policy of attempting to appease Ankara by compromising America’s stand on a fundamental issue of human rights. I would respectfully offer the following questions as a starting point for such a review:

1. President Obama has repeatedly stated that, “I have consistently stated my own view of what occurred in 1915.” These views include an extensive public record of statements, videos, and written documents. Does the Department of State consider any of these past statements by the current President to be “a matter of historical debate”? If so, which statements, and why?

— “The occurrence of the Armenian Genocide in 1915 is not an ‘allegation,’ a ‘personal opinion,’ or a ‘point of view.’ Supported by an overwhelming amount of historical evidence, it is a widely documented fact.” (Senator Barack Obama’s letter to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on July 28, 2006 to express dismay over the recall of Ambassador to Armenia John Evans for recognizing the Armenian Genocide.)

— “[T]he Armenian Genocide is not an allegation, a personal opinion, or a point of view, but rather a widely documented fact supported by an overwhelming body of historical evidence. . . . America deserves a leader who speaks truthfully about the Armenian Genocide and responds forcefully to all genocides. ” (Barack Obama on the Importance of U.S.-Armenia Relations, January 19, 2008.)

— “For those who aren’t aware, there was a genocide that did take place against the Armenian people. It is one of these situations where we have seen a constant denial on part of the Turkish Government and others that this occurred.” (Video of Senator Obama during a public constituent meeting on April 12, 2007.)

— “Nearly 2 million Armenians were deported during the Armenian Genocide, which was carried out by the Ottoman Empire from 1915 to 1923, and approximately 1.5 million of those deported were killed.” (Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on European Affairs, Senator Obama, Question for the Record to Ambassador-designate Yovanovitch, June 19, 2008.)

— “The occurrence of the Armenian genocide is a widely documented fact supported by an overwhelming collection of historical evidence.” (Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on European Affairs, Senator Obama, statement commemorating the Armenian Genocide, April 28, 2008.)

— “[T]he United States must recognize the events of 1915 to 1923, carried out by the Ottoman Empire, as genocide. . . The Bush Administration’s refusal to do so is inexcusable.” (Senator Obama, constituent email response, dated June 16, 2008.)

2. In 2008 you stated that “[T]he horrible events perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire against Armenians constitute a clear case of genocide,” and that, “[o]ur common morality and our nation’s credibility as a voice for human rights challenge us to ensure that the Armenian Genocide be recognized and remembered by the Congress and the President of the United States.” What has changed in your understanding of the history, facts, and evidence of the Armenian Genocide since this statement that has led you to downgrade this “clear case of genocide” to “a matter of historical debate?”

3. Both you and President Obama, during your service in the U.S. Senate, formally called upon President George W. Bush to recognize the Armenian Genocide in a letters dated April 20, 2006 and April 18, 2005, both of which stated the Armenian Genocide was a “systematic and deliberate campaign of genocide perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire in 1915. . . The victims of the Genocide deserve our remembrance and their rightful place in history… It is in the best interests of our nation and the entire global community to remember the past and learn from these crimes against humanity to ensure that they are never repeated.” Do you today regret or in any way seek to disavow or distance yourself or the Department of State from the principled position that you expressed in these letters?

4. In light of the priority that the President has attached to moving Turkey towards an honest reckoning with its past and your own statement that the U.S. “will stand with those who seek to advance the cause of democracy and human rights wherever they may live,” why have U.S. diplomats in Turkey not prominently participated in programs led by Turkish citizens in remembrance of the Armenian Genocide, or openly condemned the continued official prosecution and public demonization of writers and others who speak honestly about the Armenian Genocide?

5. You have said that, “The struggle for human rights begins with telling the truth over and over again.” Would the Department of State – as it did in the case of Ambassador John Evans – discipline, penalize, or otherwise take any action against U.S. diplomats or other employees for speaking truthfully about the Armenian Genocide?

6. Vice President Biden – who cosponsored every resolution to commemorate the Armenian Genocide introduced in the Senate dating back to 1984 – entered the White House with a long record of working for full and formal U.S. recognition of the Armenian Genocide. Does the Department of State disagree with, disavow, or in any way seek to distance itself from the following past statements by the current Vice President?

— In 2006, while serving as the Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Senator Biden wrote, in a letter to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, that, “The State Department’s own historical records provide ample evidence that the Ottoman Empire’s slaughter of 1.5 million ethnic Armenians constituted genocide. Henry Morgenthau, who served as the United States Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire from 1913 to 1916, describes a brutal ‘campaign of race extermination’ perpetrated by Ottoman forces… To punish an American official for correctly describing any historical event raises serious questions about the United States’ commitment to the values of transparency and honesty.” (Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Senator Joseph Biden’s letter, dated June 23, 2006, to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to express concern over reports that Ambassador to Armenia, John Evans, was recalled for accurately describing the Armenian Genocide as a genocide.)

— In 2007, Senator Biden publicly stated that he supported the Armenian Genocide Resolution because as a legislative champion working for its adoption, “I have found in my experience that you cannot have a solid relationship with a country based on fiction. It occurred. It occurred… If you want to be a member of the international community in good standing, it’s got to be based upon historical fact.” (Senator Biden interview with the Los Angeles Times, May 14, 2007.)

7. Does the Department of State have any reason to disbelieve or dispute any of the following official reports, findings, and conclusions by State Department officials during the Armenian Genocide? If so, which statements and why?

— In June 5, 1915, U.S. Consul in Aleppo, Jesse Jackson, wrote to Ambassador Morgenthau: “There is a living stream of Armenians pouring into Aleppo from the surrounding towns and villages, the principal ones being Marash, Zeitoun, Hassanbeyli, Osmania, Baghtche, Adana, Dortyol, Hadjin, etc. . . The [Ottoman] Government has been appealed to by various prominent people and even by those in authority to put an end to these conditions, under the representations that it can only lead to the greatest blame and reproach, but all to no avail. It is without doubt a carefully planned scheme to thoroughly extinguish the Armenian race.” NA/RG59/867.4016/177.

— On July 24, 1915, in a report to Ambassador Morgenthau, U.S. Consul in Harput, Leslie Davis, reported: “Any doubt that may have been expressed in previous reports as to the Government’s intention in sending away the Armenians have been removed . . . It has been no secret that the plan was to destroy the Armenian race as a race . . . Everything was apparently planned months ago.” NA/RG59/867.4016/269.

— In a telegram to Secretary of State Robert Lansing, U.S. Charge d’Affaires, Hoffman Philip, wrote on October 1, 1916: “The Department is in receipt of ample details demonstrating the horrors of the anti-Armenian campaign. For many months past I have felt that the most efficacious method of dealing with the situation from an international standpoint would be to flatly threaten to withdraw our Diplomatic Representative from a country where such barbarous methods are not only tolerated but actually carried out by order of the existing government.” NA/RG59/867.4016/297.

— The Honorable Abram I. Elkus, who served as the United States Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire from 1916 through 1917, telegrammed the Secretary of State on October 17, 1916, stating: “In order to avoid opprobrium of the civilized world, which the continuation of massacres [of the Armenians] would arouse, Turkish officials have now adopted and are executing the unchecked policy of extermination through starvation, exhaustion, and brutality of treatment hardly surpassed even in Turkish history.” NA/RG59/867.4016/299.

8. Would the Department of State describe the Holocaust or the genocides in Cambodia or Rwanda as a “historical debate,” or call for the creation of a historical “commission” to ascertain whether these crimes in fact took place?

9. Is the U.S. government’s decision-making process regarding the recognition of the Armenian Genocide influenced in any way by the Turkish government’s public threats to retaliate against such an acknowledgment?

10. If Turkey were to finally recognize the Armenian Genocide, would the U.S. government then follow Ankara’s lead and also formally acknowledge this crime?

Honest and open responses to these questions, in addition to bringing a badly needed measure of transparency to American policy on the Armenian Genocide, would also serve as a meaningful foundation for a reasoned discourse among government and civil society stakeholders about ending the era of the United States’ complicity in Turkey’s denials. More broadly, full and formal recognition of this crime – representing, as it would, a very public rejection of Ankara’s efforts to impose a gag-rule on America – would represent a meaningful step toward stopping the worldwide cycle of genocide that continues to plague humanity.

Thank you for your consideration of our concerns. We look forward to hearing from you on these important matters. We are also interested in learning of any actions you have taken in response to the recent adoption by the U.S. House of H.Res.306, which, as you know, specifically calls the Secretary of State, in all official contacts with Turkish officials, to emphasize, among other religious freedom considerations, that Turkey should return all Christian churches and religious properties to their rightful owners.

As we have several times over the past three years – we again request the opportunity to discuss the full range of our concerns with you personally during a meeting with the broad-based leadership of the Armenian American community.

Kenneth V. Hachikian


Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.


  1. Alex Postallian said:

    How much money did it take from the turks to buy your integrity. When I was a kid,we used to say,if you put a $100 suit on a bum,he still looks like a bum.

  2. Hrant K. said:

    Oil, Hefty Lucrative Military Arms Sales Contracts, Strategic and Corporate Interests’ are and have been the most

    pressurizing reasons, that for a Century long, continuous State Dept Secretaries have been hostages to. We

    Armenian Americans have got to find ways to outweigh those obstacles. One of the ways to change the Tide is the

    Presidential Elections. The second way is throwing Turkey out of NATO, as one Presidential candidate had

    suggested. The third way is preventing at any cost the Sick Man Of “Asia” from becoming a Member of the European

    Union! The forth way is to support the Turkish Intellectuals of Human Integrity and creating a bridge

    with them, instead of ignoring or negating their existence! The fifth way is creting an Armada of Media Influentials,

    Diplomats and IT and Econometricians!

  3. nana said:

    She took this job knowing that she will be saying things that are untrue.

    We better focus on helping modern Turks who are trying to elevate their people to the recognition of the Armenian genocide. If they reach that moral level, then there will be no fear for inviting them into any society – EvU (European Union) or AfU (African Union) or AsU (Asian Union). We better stop asking/criticizing Clintons and Liebermans to be honest. Honesty does not pay their bills.

  4. truth said:

    Dear Secretary Clinton is tired, tired of being forced to lie an use of justifications and most ‎probably she is even not much interested in re-election of Obama !‎

  5. Avetis said:

    This is all so silly… The viper in question is simply serving her rabid empire. The main difference between her and someone like Frank Pallone or John Evens, for example, is that unlike the aforementioned two Clinton is not tasked with administering/handling the empire’s Armenian subjects. Wake up to the realities of superpower politics Western style, Armenians.

  6. zareh said:

    Kennetth, You are wasting your time with Hillary and the entire Democratic Party apparatus. They are no different than the previous administration. They lie to their teeth, say whatever it takes to get the Armenian vote and then make a 180 degree turn. I respect prostitutes more than these clowns. At least with prostitutes you get what you pay for.

  7. John K. said:

    It would be naive to expect an honest answer from a politician, especially from of Hillary Clinton. She is a perfect example of diplomatic DISHONESTY. Her recent statements show she is, and always was for sale to a highest bidder.With her, as the proverb goes, “money talks”. I wouldn’t be surprised if she turns into a lobbyist for turkish government, a la Dick Gephardt.

  8. Vazken said:

    Humen rights issues are ambivalent issue in United States… , Our issue is NOT a humen rights one, but! Historically and Scientifically proven, and Justified, Justice Issue!
    We Armenians, should put our foot in her f- business, and stop her! Wheeling and Dealing with Turks on our account.
    They say time heals everything. United States owe us for 95 years ripping the benefit of politicising Armenian Genocide issue: while took us as-long “Liking our wounds” to heal? It is self-explanatory why doesn’t heal, because our wound is sooo-deep that drive any humen into irrationality.
    Turks commited “1915 Armenian Race Extermination” in the killing fields of present Syria. Those who survived took refuge in Syria. The same turk who distroyed Armenians now in cahoots with United States and Israel, trying to distroy Syria, where Armenians were welcomed.
    United States Ideals won’t survive for too long, when identifying herself with Criminal government of turky who deny historic facts of her past.

  9. Arto Djerian said:

    Dear, Hilary,,,,,,,,,, Remember, Remember, Can You Forget, MONICA LEWINSKI,,
    But you are used to ( Forget )
    Dear Armenians, How you Expect that she Mrs.Clinton ( Remembers Armenians ))

  10. ABADJIAN BERGE said:

    I endorce the questions asked by Mr. Ken Hachikian regarding the Armenian Genocide / 1915 addressed to Mrs. Hillary Clinton, President Obama, USA administration !
    The fact not to recognize the genocide upon 2000 000 Armenians by the Turks is a grave offence and inexcusable fact ! Shame on the USA !

  11. Garo Avedis said:

    does she understand thue meaning of the Pledge of Allegiance?
    I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

    • Alex Postallian said:

      When she was appointed,I said she was a loser,everybody criticized me,she always had a for sale sign on her back,her old man too.The only allegiance she pledges, is the dollar.$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

  12. said:

    One word to all Armenian Americans – don’t be fooled by the Democrats vs. Republicans ploy – they are all the same and members of ONE ruling elite party of America! If Communists were smart enough to split into “two” parties and pretend to fight each other, the USSR would still be a world power.

    What do we want from a regime that was founded on the Genocide of the Native Americans – the real owners of all of the land in this country? Just like Turkic nomads moved to Armenia and killed Armenians, European nomads moved to America and killed Native Americans. They are all the same. If you “own” a piece of bloody land in this country, do your research, check out the records – most likely you own a stolen property! Somebody was killed or deported in order for the “original” European nomads to sell it to you.

    There is only one way for Armenians to deal with this – spend all our efforts to support Armenia, Artsakh, and Javakh. Strong, powerful, and truly independent ARMENIA is the best guarantor of our future. All the clowns of the Republican-Democrat conglomerate are not worth a dime and their recognition or no recognition debate is a distraction to Hye Tad.

  13. Sarkis Khazarian said:

    Enough for the coverups. As Saroyian said, there is the Witness who knows the truth of all things. No matter how much we press the issue for our elected officials to acknowledge the fact of the Armenian Cenocide, they, as a rule, go where the money is or as Peter Balakian said if a country has oil the U. S is extremely interested in its relationship with the U.S. No matter how much we implore or demand the truth from these politicians our power must be through the legal system. What value can you put on the loss of life, property, historical relics, churches, family relationships which would have been had those martyrs survived to transition through the generations and rear further geberations? The importabce of the Armenian Genocide is not only historical, it is also religious, societal, international and moral.

  14. David said:

    Does anyone know just how much have Armenians contributed to Clinton/Bush/Obama?
    Maybe it’s time to stop donating any money to their campaigns? Next time, get it in writing then, at least you can sue them when they renege on their promise. It took the same US Govt 100 years just to acknowledge its despicable treatment of native Americans or give african Americans their rights- so we”re just “slow”, give us a little more time-we’re getting there. Keep those cards and emails coming to her especially ones from Armenia. I don’t think she reads Armenian but she’s smart enough to know exactly what you’re trying to say.

  15. Garo A said:

    Bravo Ken, he has done a superb job of pinning the Secretary with straight questions with documentation.
    The Secretary will be in a tough corner defending her statement without being further ridiculed by the world. We have to call every politician to honor their statements during elections, and commit to their positions, otherwise Zareh will be right.
    Thank you Ken for the great job.

  16. janet salbashian said:

    Perhaps Ms Clinton might believe that the millions of Armenians who perished under the Ottaman Empire were just a figment of the imagination of those who survived to tell their stories of horror !

    • R.S. said:

      What do you expect from this fake character who turned a blind eye to the shenanigans of her husband for political gain. She will sell her soul rather than be ethical and stand for the truth. In the era of satellites and long range rockets and nuclear bomb, Americans do not need the Turks!!!