On the Front Lines of the Information War: Debunking Azerbaijani Disinformation

Ambassador Richard Kauzlarich (left), moderator Holly O’Neal (center), and Ambassador John Evans (right) during the discussion

Bloomfield College, Class of 2013
ANCA Leo Sarkisian Intern Class of 2012

A benefit of being in Washington is to see foreign policy being hashed out first hand – not just in the halls of Congress or the Administration, but at think tank sponsored events, bringing together experts to provide insights on everything from U.S. policy on China to the Middle East or anywhere in the world, for that matter. These events attract all sorts of folks – Ambassadors, U.S. government officials, researchers, students, – who come in and offer their views, ask questions, or just plain listen. The issues discussed and the positions advocated often help shape – directly or indirectly – how government deals with these concerns.

The ANCA Leo Sarkisian interns got to see a snapshot of how the think tank event world works first hand on June 20 at “Averting Conflict in the Caucasus – Is Russia a Partner or a Spoiler” sponsored by the World Affairs Council and Center for Transatlantic Relations at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.

The guest speakers were former US Ambassadors to Armenia and Azerbaijan, John Evans and Richard Kauzlarich. Everyone in the Armenian American community, of course, knows Ambassador Evans – whose principled statements reaffirming the Armenian Genocide led to his recall from his position as U.S. Ambasador. Amb. Kauzlarich served as the U.S. envoy to Azerbaijan from 1994-1997, amongst his other responsibilities at the State Department.

The discussion pertained to Russia’s role in the greater Caucasus region – Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan as well as Northern Caucasian Russia. Although the discussion by both former Ambassadors touched upon the Georgia-Russia conflict and North Caucasus states, the main topic ended up being the Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh Republic) conflict – not surprising given where these two senior diplomats had served.

ANCA 2012 Leo Sarkisian Interns with Ambassador Evans after the event. From left to right: Kyle Movsessian, Garen Bostanian, Grigor Grigorian, Aram Balian, Ambassador John Evans, Ara Nerssessian, David Oganesyan, Joseph Kazazian, Carina Khanjian, and Armen Sahakyan

I won’t go into the specific arguments for each of the Ambassadors per se – but would like to focus on the discussion that followed.

The Ambassadors, to their credit, held a collegial and balanced dialogue regarding the situation in the region.

And then, all hell broke loose in the question and answer session.

An Azeri diplomat went into a diatribe of false and old claims regarding the so-called “occupation” of 20 percent Azeri lands, Armenia’s unconstructive approach in the negotiations process, removal of the Armenian forces from the “occupied territories”, and other nonsensical statements. These provocative words raised the tension in the room, and set the path for the rest of the discussion to be about Artsakh.

Next up was, Armenian diplomat Andranik Hovhannisyan, who debunked the Azerbaijani diplomat’s allegations with remarks of his own.

The moderator, concerned she is losing control of the whole affair, tried to cut the Armenian diplomat short – but Hovhannisyan stood his ground.

Then Aram Avetisyan from the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic Representative’s office took the microphone and asserted the point that Armenia cannot negotiate with a country that constantly threatens with war, exponentially expands its military budget, and does not lose any opportunity to spread anti-Armenian propaganda.

Gradually, the discussion curved from Russia’s role in the Caucasus to the Artsakh conflict.

That was my opportunity to ask a question regarding the reinstatement of Artsakh in the negotiations process. Azerbaijan’s mission has been to deprive Artsakh a seat from the negotiations table to secure the upper hand in the peace talks. Of course, the premise is absurd. The Nagorno Karabakh Republic is a co-signer of the ceasefire of 1994. How could it possibly not be included in the discussions that would decide its own fate?

And so the questions continued – with the speakers talking about the need for Armenia and Azerbaijan to come to their own consensus – working with the international mediators – to find a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

What struck me, though, is how important it was to have pro-Armenia voices participating at this event – to counter the Azerbaijani government’s lies. If the Armenian Embassy, Nagorno-Karabakh Republic office, ANCA and other concerned Armenians were not there – the Azerbaijani diplomat’s remarks would have set the tone for the discussion.

These discussions are a forum to bring up issues like the importance of the international community’s clear and forceful condemnation of all past and present Azeri aggressions against Armenia and the need to fight for the formal reinstatement of Artsakh back into the Minsk Group peace process.

These forums are an opportunity to ask experts why Azerbaijan always tries to keep the tension high on the front lines and provoke military action – all the while professing they are committed to a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

And we don’t have to limit ourselves to events in Washington, DC. The World Affairs Council – and groups like them – have chapters all around the country, not to mention event possibilities at our local campuses. Joining these groups, working with our campus political science departments is a great way to spotlight issues related to Armenia, Artsakh and the Armenian nation.

The ANCA Leo Sarkisian team did its part on June 20, asking key questions on Artsakh policy concerns and helping debunk Azerbaijani propaganda. Now time to go back to our communities and work with our local ANC’s, AYF’s and ASA’s to continue in the same spirit on and off campus.


Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.


  1. Armen said:

    Thank you Armen for your courage by standing up for our rights, for me anyone disagree that Artsakh should be independent or be reunited to the motherland Armenia is reinforcing the will of communist leader J. Stalin, who distributed the Armenian lands without asking the will of the Armenian people living in there for last thousands of years. Today we are in this situation because of Stalin wrong doing, not in Artsakh alone but look what happened to Nakhichevan, a land that has no borders with Azerbaijan at all, can somebody explain why it should be under Azeri control, so the original owners of the land the Armenians be persecuted and exterminated by Azeries Turks brothers, whoever do not know the truth and the history must learn it, otherwise supports communist J.Stalin by asking from Armenians to return any of the liberated lands to Azeries

  2. Tarik said:

    My great grandfather was always proud of what he did to Armenian rebels in 1915. I hope a day comes when I get a chance to continue what he started in 1915. And maybe I will. Once the war with Iran starts, a whole mess will engulf the region. And Turkey and Azerbaijan will take advantage of the chaos to wipe out Armenia once for all. Amen!