Baroness Cox Reveals Baku’s True Motives

Baroness Cox of British House of Lords

LONDON—Member of the British House of Lords and chair of the British-Armenian All-Party Parliamentary Group Baroness Caroline Cox delivered remarks at House of Lords during a debate about the United Kingdom’s relations with Azerbaijan and its role in the South Caucasus on Tuesday.

“I have visited the region 78 times, many during the war against Nagorno Karabakh. I regret that my contribution to this debate will be unpopular, because it is critical of Azerbaijan, but it is based on first-hand evidence,” Baroness Cox said.

“I begin with a brief reference to aspects of recent history relevant to current issues. I visited Azerbaijan in 1991, when I met the then president and political leaders. I was dismayed by the explicit commitment to ethnic cleansing of the Armenians from Nagorno Karabakh. I also visited Karabakh then and met Azeris living in homes which had recently been owned by Armenians who had been evicted by Azerbaijan’s well documented policy, Operation Ring, in which Armenian villagers were surrounded by Azeri troops who killed, tortured and drove villagers off their land,” she continued.

“The Armenians were the primary victims as they had already been victims in the massacres in Baku and Sumgait. Then Azerbaijan unleashed full-scale war. I witnessed 400 Grad missiles daily raining onto Karabakh’s capital city, an aerial bombardment of civilian homes with 500 kilogram bombs. I also witnessed war crimes perpetrated by Azerbaijan on Armenian civilians at Karabakh, such as the cold-blooded massacre of villagers in Maragha. I was there hours afterwards and saw corpses whose heads had been sawn off and burnt, mutilated bodies. I visited Khojaly and can testify that the tragic events were not as portrayed by Azerbaijan-a massacre of Azeris by Armenians. Independent journalists and Azerbaijan’s former President Mutalibov have publicly come to the same conclusion,” Baroness Cox emphasized.

She also noted that the Armenian forces’ taking control over the territories surrounding Nagorno Karabakh was not aggressive land grabbing, but essential for survival, as they were used as bases for constant shelling of towns and villages inside Karabakh. “I was there when one ceasefire was broken by Azerbaijan, with renewed bombing from Azeri bases in these lands,” she said.

“This recent history is relevant to current concerns as the 1994 ceasefire is precarious. There is an urgent need for peace for the peoples of Azerbaijan and Armenia and because the peoples of the south Caucasus do not want another destabilizing regional war. However, Azerbaijan’s continuing hostile policies are detrimental to attempts to reach a solution to this semi-frozen conflict. For example, the noble Lord, Lord Laird, mentioned the case of Ramil Safarov, the Azeri military officer who used an axe to murder an Armenian officer in his sleep while both men were attending a NATO course in Budapest in 2004. Safarov was arrested, convicted and sentenced to a lengthy term of imprisonment. But, when Hungary repatriated Safarov to Azerbaijan, on the understanding that he would continue to serve his prison sentence, he was released from prison and welcomed as a hero. According to the Economist in September 2012, this led to a new war of words in one of the world’s most volatile regions,” she said.

“Patrick Ventrell, spokesman for the US State Department, said that the United States was extremely troubled by the pardon of Safarov and would be seeking an explanation from both Budapest and Baku. Russia, involved in trying to ease relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan, said that the actions of the Hungarian and Azeri Governments contradicted internationally brokered efforts to bring peace to the region. May I ask the Minister what representations have been made by Her Majesty’s Government to Azerbaijan concerning the release and the honouring of the convicted murderer Safarov?

The Economist also raised questions about the EU’s credibility when it pledged €19.5 million to reform oil-rich Azerbaijan’s justice and migration systems. Since 2006, Azerbaijan’s economy, with its vast oil and gas reserves, has nearly tripled to $62 billion. May I ask the Minister what the EU’s justification was in giving €19.5 million to such a wealthy country? Moreover, there is widely-held concern over Azerbaijan’s massive investment in its military arsenal-a 20-fold increase in seven years. Apart from expenditure on arms, in a nation where many still live in poverty, there is deep anxiety over the propensity to renew war with Nagorno-Karabakh. This danger is exacerbated by Azerbaijan’s constant use of belligerent and hostile propaganda, which is not conducive to confidence-building or effective peace negotiations,” the Baroness noted.

Finally Baroness Caroline Cox referred to Azerbaijan’s disturbing record on human rights, particularly on freedom of the press and religious freedom.

“No country has an interest in other countries, only interests-and we have oil interests in Azerbaijan,” she concluded.

“Azerbaijan pours massive funds into propaganda, disseminating positive images of its progress while trying to prevent access to Karabakh by intimidating potential visitors who wish to see the situation there for themselves. After one of my visits in recent years, an article appeared in an Azeri newspaper, entitled “Shoot the Cox!”. Parliamentarians visiting Armenia receive letters from Azeri authorities threatening to place them on a blacklist if they visit Karabakh. The British Ambassador is still not allowed to visit Karabakh, although the political and diplomatic representatives of other nations do so. Therefore, it is hard for the Armenians of Karabakh to have their story of Azerbaijan’s policies told.

I deeply regret having had to make such a critical speech. Of course, I can be accused of partiality, but if my contribution is partial, it is accurate, based on first-hand evidence and corroborated by many independent sources. I hope it is helpful to put on record some often untold aspects of the situation, because the search for a just and lasting peace can only be based on an understanding of historic and contemporary reality in all its multi-faceted complexity,” she stressed.


Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.


  1. Alexander "Who Tries to be Great" said:

    Oil talks, and your G.B. walks just like in the past they walked out on us and let the Turks drive out Armenians from Baku, same turks that claim to call themselves Azeri’s today.

    • GB said:

      Real Azeri people live in Iran and are part of Persian culture …these Azer Baboons people are by-product of Ottomans Turks!!

  2. George said:

    US and EU should decide on the values they want to protect, the world is gone crazy by Ziging and Zaging on the values they stand for.

  3. jenny said:

    Thank you, Baronex Cox. May USA’s politicians be as noble as you in their service to our country. Your constituents must be proud to have such a commendable representative!

  4. Varpet Karapetian said:

    Regardless of historical facts, that Karabagh never had been in “Azarbayjan” teritory, and during Soviet period, it was an self governed republic , regionaly anexed to Baku, and regardless of self determination right of all nations, How Baku is expecting Karabagh be annexed and governed by Baku, where there is no garanty for living of any Armenian in thier homeland of Karabagh , obviously in their mass-propaganda, they encorage their population to kill even sleeping person and be revwarded as a hiro, actually at the moment, in Azerbayjan, no Armenian is living, and if the karabagh be joined to them , 160 000 Armenian population will be slaughtered ;

  5. hamo said:

    Thanks to THE BRAVE Baroness. If only half of politicians had half of Baroness’ courage, then we will have a better world.

  6. albert said:

    Barnoness Cox is unique among the British aristocratic classes because she is a true humanitarian and a true Christian who states the ugly truth which is not in the interest of British Petroleum which the British Government is a major stockholder in. The British imperialist and petroleum interests have been seeking control of the Baku oil since the 1920’s and have played different sides against each other. The British supported the white Russians. It is interesting to note that the British supported the Centrocaspian Republic which was an Armenian republic in Baku but later abandoned it.

  7. Artin said:

    Baroness Cox is a true friend of Armenia and ALL Armenians everywhere. She is welcome in my home and i am sure she would be welcome in ANY other Armenian’s. She has helped the Armenian nation continuously no matter how unpopular this may be, because as we all know, the UK is completely Anti-Armenian. You guys think the Americans are bad?? The British will backstab ANYONE and prostitute their nation in ANY form in order to get money and/or oil.