Constitutional Referendum Indefinitely Delayed

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan held a virtual press conference on Saturday
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan held a virtual press conference on Saturday

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan held a virtual press conference on Saturday

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on Saturday cited the global COVID-19 crisis in announcing that a constitutional referendum scheduled for April 5 would be delayed indefinitely. He added that the government was discussing several options, including resolving the issue in the legislature, to emerge from what Armenia’s authorities see as a constitutional gridlock.

The referendum was scheduled to give the state the ability to remove Constitutional Court judges, including the chief justice Hrayr Tovmasyan, who were appointed by the previous regime and who Pashinyan and his government believe were still acting in the interests of the former leaders. The referendum was postponed after a state of emergency was declared to combat the spread of the coronavirus.

Speaking to reporters on Saturday during a virtual press conference Pashinyan said that the issue would be resolved through various options, including a partial or complete resolution, which will be decided by parliament.

Armenia’s Justice Minister Ruslan Badasyan on Thursday asked the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe to suggest ways that Armenia would emerge from the “constitutional crisis.”

“As part of the referendum, we also planned to apply to the Venice Commission as a result of our discussions. But our prediction is that the coronavirus will exist in our reality for at least a year, which means that we cannot hold a referendum for at least a year because as we have stated the well-being of the public is of higher importance that a political issue,” Pashinyan said.

“Thus, it is impossible to hold a referendum during the coronavirus pandemic. But on the other hand, we cannot wait for the solution of the situation around the Constitutional Court, until the end of the coronavirus. Even if we wait, we have formed a commission on Constitutional amendments: constitutional amendments should take place in the future, and in this context we will resolve the issue according to conclusions by the parliament and may be put to a referendum in June 2021,” adde Pashinyan.

“But now we have applied to the Venice Commission, and the issue of solving the Constitutional Court crisis in the parliament with any formula, partially or completely, is being currently discussed,” said Pashinyan, who during the discussion of a referendum said on several occasions that seeking the counsel of the Venice Commission would not be necessary.

On Saturday he said that the pandemic had not deter the government from working with international partners in order to receive effective and also consensus-based solutions.

Authors

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

2 Comments

  1. Barséghian Ardachèce said:

    I am pleased to note that a rich debate emerges from civil and professional society, with lawyers, lawyers, political scientists, intellectuals and if only Mr. Pachinian you hear them consult them in the interest of the nation and its interest rather than confined to its only irrational partisan policy, doctrinaire, constantly reminding that it is of popular will. Yes the people of the country and the diaspora supported it in unity and myself, but the crucial reforms concerning the judicial administration there are serious gaps in competence by the choice of men and its actions decisions confused or even contrary to its so-called will to eradicate corruption. 2 shocking examples: 1- State thieves of yesteryear are catch imprisoning, they pay a sum of money … steals and they’re liberes. 2- None of the magistrates these corropus and corruptors who have survived for 20 years, voluntarily to enrich themselves with demeaning on the back of the litigant, are still in office … 2 years are gone and I would say 3- The grounds for incrimination are insignificant in the face of the evidence of fortunes accumulated by corruption invested in real estate, companies, foreign banks on behalf of their family members. Yes I am happy to hear all this in all the opposition media and this is a given that we owe to Mr Pachinian, BIEN, but he does not want to hear and a popular proverb says “it is no longer blind one who does not want to see, he is no more ill-heard than one who does not want to hear”. We will get by but the sooner the diaspora of pensions will come to the country the faster the state apparatus will be strong with a return to the social level. Armenia is a very beautiful country with exemplary human potentialites that remain to be guided.

  2. Abraham said:

    I think that could be a dangerous move by this government, as it will create a precedent by allowing new governments to stack the courts by appointing their own judges. Should the people of Armenia decide to support such referendum and by the way, it is their democratic right to do so, I am afraid they may live to regret their decision. In a true democracy, the executive power should be kept separate from the judiciary.

*

Top