Eastern Europe Nervous as US Courts Russia

WARSAW, Poland (AP) — A group of prominent former Eastern European leaders wrote to President Barack Obama on Thursday that their region is gripped by anxiety that his efforts to reach out to Russia could lead him to forget their interests.

The 22 former leaders warned U.S. credibility would be damaged if Washington abandons plans for a missile shield, saying they still feel bullied by their giant neighbor and former master. They claimed Russia continues to challenge their sovereignty 20 years after the Cold War’s end.
They called missile defense the “thorniest” of current issues in a letter carried on the Web site of the Gazeta Wyborcza newspaper and to be delivered in Washington later Thursday.

The Bush administration reached agreements last year to station interceptor missiles at a base in Poland and a linked radar base in the Czech Republic. Russia vehemently opposes the plan and Obama is skeptical of it and is undertaking a thorough review.

“Abandoning the program entirely or involving Russia too deeply in it without consulting Poland or the Czech Republic can undermine the credibility of the United States across the whole region,” according to the letter signed by ex-leaders from countries once in the Soviet-controlled communist bloc but now NATO and EU members.

The signatories include former presidents Lech Walesa and Aleksander Kwasniewski of Poland, Vaclav Havel of the Czech Republic, Emil Constantinescu of Romania and Vaira Vike-Freiberga of Latvia. They describe themselves as U.S. allies who remain deeply indebted to America for helping bring down the Iron Curtain.

Many Eastern Europeans today still feel enormous gratitude to U.S. efforts to oppose their oppressive communist-era regimes, with a particular affection for Ronald Reagan and other Republican leaders. Polish analyst Olaf Osica, with the Natolin European Center think tank in Warsaw, said the region tends to view Democratic administrations with more skepticism, fearful they will favor a “realistic” approach to Russia over the “idealism” of opposing Moscow’s strength.

“Had a ‘realist’ view prevailed in the early 1990s, we would not be in NATO today and the idea of a Europe whole, free, and at peace would be a distant dream,” the letter said.

The letter comes days after an Obama visit to Moscow, where he sought to reboot the tense relationship between the U.S. and Russia, including a renewed focus on paring down nuclear stockpiles.

While missile defense came up in the talks, there was no progress and further discussions were put aside for a later date.

Russia has threatened to deploy missiles near Poland if the U.S. pushes ahead with the shield. Obama has attempted to reassure Moscow that the system is geared to tempering a ballistic missile threat from countries like Iran, a strong trading partner of Russia.

There is “nervousness in our capitals,” the authors wrote. “We want to ensure that too narrow an understanding of Western interests does not lead to the wrong concession to Russia.”

While they welcome Obama’s attempts to “reset” ties with Russia, they warned that Russia still acts as if it has final say in the region.
“Our hopes that relations with Russia would improve and that Moscow would finally fully accept our complete sovereignty and independence after joining NATO and the EU have not been fulfilled,” the letter says. “Instead, Russia is back as a revisionist power pursuing a 19th-century agenda with 21st century tactics and methods.”

The authors cite economic warfare, a reference to recent gas cut-offs in past years to Ukraine and others. They also allege Russia has made politically motivated investments and engaged in bribery and media manipulation in order to advance its interests and to challenge the trans-Atlantic orientation of Central and Eastern Europe.

A security analyst, Bartosz Wisniewski, said the letter is more “alarmist and defensive in tone” than the reality would dictate, especially since Obama has tried to reassure the region that he would not sacrifice its interests in his rapprochement with Russia.
“But if you want to get something across in Washington you need to be vocal,” said Wisniewski, who works for a state-funded think tank, the Polish Institute of International Affairs.

He said it’s notable what is absent from the 3,000-word letter. There is no mention of Ukraine or desires for further NATO enlargement and only the briefest mention of Georgia.

“It’s about consolidating what has already been gained in the last 20 years and taking care of the allies that you already have and not thinking about the others,” Wisniewski said. “It is a very realistic approach given the priorities of the Obama administration.”


Related posts

Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.

One Comment;

  1. Papken Haertunian said:

    To keep Russia at bay has been the most important goal of US and EU. This letter is another attempt to cover up their real intent. The real threat to EU, US and the rest of the World is Russia.