Let’s Publicize Armenia Correctly

Being in the newspaper business all my life, I know the true value of good public relations. And publicizing Armenia correctly continues to be an ongoing struggle.

It’s too bad that every journalist in America wasn’t Armenian or sympathetic to our cause. But I’m afraid that is not the case. We must create our own PR vehicle.

Public relations is really an art — giving the public what it likes to hear and creating awareness. A good public event often deserves publicity, but is more often created by it.

Not long ago, I was being interviewed by a reporter of a small town journal. Now that’s a switch. It’s usually me asking the questions and others giving the answers.

Being in charge of publicizing our church picnic, I took it upon myself to draw up a press release and send it off electronically. Nothing to it. A day or two later, I followed up with a note to each paper with the idea of going a step beyond and having a feature story done. What’s there to lose, right?

Church picnics don’t ordinarily call for extenuating stories but a graph or two at the bottom of the lifestyles page and perhaps a blurb in the coming events column.

But this was no ordinary picnic. Our Armenian church was joining forces with the Catholic Church next door and hosting a combined picnic. Masses were being involved. Two churches of different spiritual backgrounds were uniting in the best Christian spirit.

Moreover, we were dedicating a new patio area in memory of deceased pastor Rev. Vartan Kassabian. The agenda was full of cultural activity. Two Armenian children troupes were coming to dance. There was a band. And enough food to feed two parishes and then some.

A reporter called some days later, looking to embellish the story and turning it into a front-page piece. I had succeeded in drawing some interest. Now here comes the debate. What I considered important to the piece, she puffed off.

“Tell us something about your Armenian church,” she asked.

“How much time do you have?” I replied. Her question was rhetorical, or so it seemed.

I went on about how we were the first nation to adopt Christianity as a state religion in 301 AD and how our church was still a catalyst in the Armenian community after more than 1,700 years.

“I did not know that,” she answered.

I assumed she knew something about the Genocide. Wrong again. Despite all the articles that have been written and published in the media, it really amazes me that there are people out there in the dark.

It’s the old question, “Armenian? What’s that?”

Then, the reporter expressed her ignorance even more.

“You want people to attend your picnic?” she added. “History doesn’t attract people to a social event. A genocide isn’t going to conjure up interest. It may stifle it. What sells is food. They want to know what’s on the menu.”

Say what! The fact we have the oldest Christian nation in the world and lose 1.5 million Armenians in 1915 can’t hold up to a piece of baklava.

I wasn’t about to tell the woman her business but if I knew nothing about a genocide and someone called me about a picnic, I might consider the sympathetic factor. The human interest quality. I might also point to the resilience of a nation in getting a genocide recognized by the rest of the world.

Okay, so food is a common denominator among cultures. Maybe I have blinders on but how can we allow kebabs to overshadow the death and revival of our sacred land.

The reporter needed a lesson in reporting.

Then came the obvious thought. If she was callous and unaware of our history, how many more were there like her encrusted into the journalism fields of America? Perhaps the fault lies with us. Maybe we’re not pushing the right buttons enough.

As conscientious Armenians, we must act as our very own publicists and make the newspapers aware of our heritage. As the 95th anniversary of our genocide approaches next year, the time to act is now. Just writing an article won’t cut it.

A better approach might be to set up a meeting with the editors and ask for equal play. I find it incongruous that one church would get an entire page of colored photographs for their picnic and another church like ours receives zilch.

When all is said and done, the worst thing you can say about our cause is NOTHING.


Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.


  1. Edward Demian said:

    I reacently had a conversation with a reporter. I was trying to corner him into admitting that certain financial interests are manipulating the news and the press in general. To my surprize, before I even made two moves on that verbal chess game, He came out with an explenation that made my point. All news companies buy their news from a central news source. Its cheaper that way. So that determines the content and the tone of the news item. Secondly, when the news are received by the local news channel, they are further filtered of any thing that might offend the sponsors. Since a large number of sponsors are Jewish, the word genocide is avoided because the Jewish sponsors would be offended thus loss of revenue. The only way to avoid this trapp, is for Armenian interests to own a major news outlet, or create one from scratch.

  2. Harry said:

    Mr. Vartabedian is to be applauded for his exuberance and optimism. Human interest stories certainly have their place, but, as he implies, they can’t tell the whole story. Maybe articles about kebab and kef are all we will get in the American press. At least that is what my experience has shown me. As a publishing professional working with major newspapers for more than 2 decades, I’d like to share that I’ve proposed many stories to writers over the years and even “called in favors” with colleagues for whom I’d given media coverage in the past. The story concepts ran the gamut from tourism articles (when Armenia celebrated its 1700th anniversary as a Christian nation and welcomed pilgrims) all the way to hard news stories (when the Douglas Frantz/Mark Arax/LA Times scandal hit, when the ADL denied the Armenian Genocide, when the Turkish-Armenian “Roadmap” was unfurled). How did my media colleagues respond? Emails and phone calls were not returned. The silence was deafening. I should add that 98% of these colleagues were of Jewish descent. Mr. Vartabedian, not all Armenians are novices when it comes to PR. But in order to do our jobs, we need a level playing field upon which to operate!

  3. Mike said:

    Actually, before we start with American reporters and general public (too busy watching football) why don’t we take a look at our own people – I mean Armenians who recently immigrated from Armenia and other countries…
    Instead of assuming that they know as much as you do, try talking to them – you’ll be surprised!

  4. B. Baronian said:

    Hey….I’m ready to give you all details of my family’ trek from: City Gurin, Province: ivas, Country: Armenia…..to North America and beyond…!

Leave a Reply to Edward Demian Cancel reply