LA Times Editorial Urges Genocide Recognition

LOS ANGELES—The LA Times issued an editorial on March 8, urging US recognition of the Armenian genocide. We provide the editorial below:

Making Sense of Genocide

Turkey needs to come to grips with its bloody past so it can move forward in its relations with Armenia and the U.S.
March 8, 2010

An estimated 1.5 million ethnic Armenians were massacred in the final throes of the Ottoman Empire. That blood bath, carried out by the Turks between 1915 and 1918, was genocide, and should be called by that name. In approving a nonbinding resolution to make this the official U.S. position, Chairman Howard L. Berman (D-Valley Village) and other members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee were responding to constituent demands that the United States take a moral stand. Now, Congress and the Obama administration must decide whether such a symbolic act also serves the strategic interests of the United States. For the moment, just like presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton before him, Barack Obama appears to be saying no.

It is important for the United States to stand for historical truth on the Armenian slaughter. Even more important is that Turks themselves come to terms with their brutal history. From Germany to South Africa to Argentina, there are many examples of countries that have confronted their violent pasts honestly.

Instead, Turkey recalled its ambassador for consultations after the 23-22 House committee vote, saying the resolution offends the country’s honor and warning of negative consequences for U.S.-Turkish relations, as well as for the ratification of agreements to normalize ties with the Republic of Armenia. A more productive approach would be for the Turks and Armenians to adopt the protocols hammered out last year to establish diplomatic relations and reopen their shared border. The U.S. vote must not become a pretext for further stalling.

During the 2008 campaign, Obama was unequivocal in his support for labeling the killings a genocide. As president, however, he has the unenviable task of weighing that position against the need for Turkey’s support in Afghanistan, in stabilizing Iraq and for United Nations sanctions against Iran. Turkey is the only Muslim country in NATO, and it currently sits on the U.N. Security Council.

We understand that any U.S. administration must nurture the vital strategic alliance with Turkey. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who coaxed Turkey and Armenia into signing the protocols last year, noted that the agreement established a commission to examine their bloody history and argued that “it is not for any other country to determine how two countries resolve matters between them.” That’s true, but we also understand Armenian fears that such a commission could whitewash history.

The goal is Turkish and Armenian reconciliation, putting to rest the ghosts of the past. That is in the U.S. interest as well as that of both peoples. For it to happen, the onus is on Turkey to acknowledge the Armenian genocide.


Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.


  1. Frank said:

    The airbase in Inclirlik is on Armenian property.
    There is no more threat of Communism
    More than half of Turkey belong to the Armenians

    They are not fighting in Afganistan.
    Everyone else is doing their share and the Turks have gone there for a picnic

  2. Guido said:

    Thanks to articles like this. We’re getting there. Year by year. Article by article.

  3. Armen said:

    Wow, good on them! I’m glad the media have started to realise the truth and the need to properly close this long ongoing matter.

  4. Norin Radd said:

    Nice piece by the LA Times, finally, journalistic integrity is being maintained regarding historical truths and the LA Times is heading in the right direction. They need to emphasize on the importance of AG recognition both in the US and in the homeland of the perpetrators that committed this crime against humanity, Turkey.

  5. Serge said:

    If Hillary Clinton is saying: “it is not for any other country to determine how two countries resolve matters between them.” then why is she involved with that stupid protocols?

Leave a Reply to Guido Cancel reply