Tuesday, June 28, 2022
No Result
View All Result
Asbarez.com
NEWSLETTER
ՀԱՅ
  • Home
  • Top Stories
  • Community
  • Arts & Culture
    • Art
    • Books
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Critics’ Forum
  • Op-Ed
    • Editorial
    • Opinon
    • Letters
  • Columns
    • By Any Means
    • My Turn
    • Three Apples
    • Community Links
    • Critics’ Forum
    • My Name is Armen
    • Living in Armenia
  • Videos
  • Sports
  • Home
  • Top Stories
  • Community
  • Arts & Culture
    • Art
    • Books
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Critics’ Forum
  • Op-Ed
    • Editorial
    • Opinon
    • Letters
  • Columns
    • By Any Means
    • My Turn
    • Three Apples
    • Community Links
    • Critics’ Forum
    • My Name is Armen
    • Living in Armenia
  • Videos
  • Sports
No Result
View All Result
Asbarez.com
ՀԱՅ
No Result
View All Result

Reparations: The New Frontier of the Armenian Cause and its Challenges

by Contributor
April 24, 2013
in Featured Story, Latest, Op-Ed, Opinon, Top Stories
7
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Philippe Kalfayan

BY PHILIPPE R. KALFAYAN

Lawsuits arising from Armenian-originated citizens of United States against Insurance or Financial establishments, detaining or having detained assets belonging to our Ottoman ancestors, paved the way for a new frontier of the Armenian Cause. Three years ago, the AGRSG (Armenian Genocide Reparation Study Group) took initiative for a preliminary report on the reparations issue. It was a good starting point, although the preliminary assessment of the report highlights its shortcomings from a strictly legal standpoint to support a judicial claim for reparation. In particular, on several technical legal points, the report is partially legally flawed (i.e. on the applicability of the 1920 Treaty of Sevres; a treaty never ratified).

In a recent editorial, Harut Sassounian commented that ìLawsuits against Turkey must be filed with utmost care, preparation and professionalism, since they impact the interests of the entire Armenian nation, particularly on the eve of the 100th Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.î One can only agree with him, but I want to elaborate a bit further on the strategic directions and every stakeholder shall understand that international exchange and cooperation and the establishment of a global strategy and judiciary action committee are urgently required when lawsuits are initiated against Turkey or its private or public institutions for the reparations issues.

Let us start by a global assessment of the situation. Continuous observation and thorough analysis of Turkish writings and declarations, human contacts with Turkish personalities, close to Foreign Affairs circles of Turkey, indicate that Turkey is ready for confronting Armenia about history and genocide. They most probably elaborated a tactical plan for thwarting 2015 “tsunami” which may consist in recognizing a minima the suffering of Armenians and crimes committed by the Young Turks during the Ottoman Empire period, and restitute or restore symbolically some assets, mainly the religious ones. They have started doing that.

However, due to two factors, which are the absence of serious long term strategy and the Karabakh issue, Armenia remains very defensive while Turkey is encouraged to pursue and reinforce its denial strategy of the genocide, as it is witnessed presently in many countries. The actions for the international recognition of Armenian genocide are deadlocked since the signature of the protocols. Putting, as Serzh Sarkissian did recently, the international recognition of genocide at the top of the agenda of Foreign Affairs of Armenia, unless it is inclusive of legal proceedings at international level, is a mistake, because the Armenian genocide is recognized de facto world-wide. Continuation of that process is a trap. Indeed the actions for recognition of the crime of genocide and combating its denial are losses of time, energy, and finances to Armenians and divert from the key challenges and goals, while those very resources fall short and time becomes of the essence.

The biggest, but not fatal, threat for the Armenian Cause is a unilateral and official recognition by Turkey of a crime and their unilateral offer of symbolic reparations, because it may jeopardize or at least minimize the outcome of any future collective or individual legal action before courts. The Federal Court decision of Los Angeles on March 26, 2013 illustrates the impact of international politics over judges, when relating to international crimes, even though the plaintiffs are nationals.

It is therefore urgent to develop a strategic roadmap on the Armenian side, focusing on the reparations. Reparations are not only a matter of justice for all the descendants of victims, but they are the only legally pertinent and viable diplomatic arm in the hands of Armenian Nation. Secondly, the right to reparations is disconnected from the legal qualification of genocide. The mass crime against Armenians and its recognition by Turkey are already established. Third, the legal actions for collective reparation claims are to be initiated by a legal subject, which may not be the Armenian State since this one does not have a personal or specific jus standi in order to claim compensation of the injury suffered by the victims. To some extent this is fortunate, because Armenia’s and Turkey’s relationship is hostage to the Karabakh issue and Azerbaijani lobbying. However, advisory proceedings before the International Court of Justice for the recognition of Turkey’s international responsibility in the crime against Armenians and its obligation to repair could, in case of satisfaction, have a positive effect for the overall settlement issue and would constitute a solid basis for negotiated claims process. This action can only be initiated by the Armenian State.

The land restitution claim is much more problematic, from a legal and political perspective, because the only legal subject capable of applying for is the Armenian State, on one hand, and it cannot do it today because of the 2009 signed protocols, on the other hand.

In order to take the necessary steps concerning a possible judicial settlement of the reparation question, an action has been engaged in Europe and it resulted in a strictly legal analysis concerning (i) the rights to reparation which the Republic of Armenia, the Armenian people, but also individuals of Armenian origin could reasonably invoke under the relevant international law rules and principles and (ii) the ways they could efficiently be enforced. Additionally the study includes proposals on a claims mechanism for the implementation of Turkey’s international responsibility and its obligation of reparation.

There are clear directions about all the work to be done especially for the success of an overall claims’ strategy, be it legal or historical fact-finding. Grouping of plaintiffs and mass claims are necessary for the sake of pan Armenian collective negotiation. It is suggested the creation of a unique trust fund to manage compensation payments. At last and not the lesser challenge, political and diplomatic actions and lobbying must be performed all along the process.

The 100th anniversary of the Armenian genocide in 2015 provides an opportune momentum and imposes a deadline, but Armenians seem to be failing so far to become prepared; it may well be already too late. However it is crucial to start the process, which ought to be very long, before that term.

The current problems of Armenia and devastating domestic and foreign politics don’t help but are not an obstacle and should not prevent the Diaspora for engaging in this initiative.

Therefore, I launch an appeal to all qualified colleagues and relevant political forces from Diaspora already involved in the Armenian cause and reparations process (the ANC could be leading this process), to whatever extent, to gather rapidly, create a liaison body, especially between Europe and USA, in order to exchange legal expertise and analysis on the reparations issue and establish a legal strategy in order to avoid counterproductive and disastrous decisions from national jurisdictions. Decisions before US domestic courts may impact other legal actions undertaken in Europe or elsewhere and vice-versa with dangerous precedents and consequences. Raising the reparations issue should be the new frontier of the Armenian cause. It offers huge prospects for activists and scholars, but also for diplomats, since it opens a new battlefield in the diplomatic strategy. Turkey will have to face directly its past and will be obliged to negotiate with the reality they originated: the so much hated Diaspora.

*Philippe Kalfayan is a lawyer, former secretary general of FIDH (international NGO defending Human Rights), expert in Human Rights and Administration of Justice at the Council of Europe. He co-founded and is executive director of AGIR (Armenian Genocide International Reparation), an international action fund intended for financing any study, research or expertise, of juridical, historical, sociological, or political nature, necessary for the legal and political settlement claims process of genocide reparations. It also aims at financing the judiciary actions serving that objective. Philippe Kalfayan is involved in the reform of the judiciary and especially the legal profession in Armenia since 1998; he has been instrumental in the reunification of advocates in a unique chamber in 2004, building the bar independence and reinforcement of skills. An initial training and a continuous professional training school has been established in 2012. He is currently special adviser and in charge of international relations at the Chamber of Advocates of the Republic of Armenia.

Contributor

Contributor

Next Post

Armenian Resistance to Genocide: An Attempt to Assess Circumstances and Outcomes

Comments 7

  1. George Mardig says:
    9 years ago

    Great article.

    Reply
  2. Ari says:
    9 years ago

    Phillipe’s proposal makes a lot of sense and it should be carried out as soon as possible. Challenges will be great as many Armenians, like myself, have nothing to proof that my surviving grandparents owned properties in Van.

    Reply
  3. Hagop D says:
    9 years ago

    There are some things here I don’t agree with. When he says the treaty of Sevres is not valid legally because it was not ratified. The point here is not whether it was ratified or not, but rather that Armenia was excluded from the process of the replacement treaty of Lausanne, and thus Lausanne is not applicable to Armenia. Armenia never agreed with Lausanne and we never will. It also not correct that The 100th anniversary of the Armenian genocide imposes a deadline – one of the articles of the Genocide convention clearly states that there is no expiration date to crimes of genocide.

    Reply
  4. Rifat says:
    9 years ago

    Instead of passing bills via legislative bodies, why don’t you Armenians take Turkey to the Hague instead?

    Reply
    • Shant says:
      9 years ago

      If you are referring to the International Criminal Court, it only has jurisdiction over events that occurred after 1 July 2002 and the ICJ in 1947 and after. Other legal institutions and bodies domestic, international, and regional, may need to be considered.

      Reply
      • Zeki says:
        9 years ago

        Jurisdiction (or lack of it) will always be a massive, if not impossible, hurdle to get over. Domestic, regional institutions and bodies are almost always constitutionally constrained when it comes to engaging with matters concerning international affairs by the Federal counterpart. International legal institutions and bodies cannot apply the law restropectively.

        Reply
  5. Ari says:
    9 years ago

    One more comment. The Turkish Republic should be held accountable for the Armenian Genocide as much as the Ottoman Government because Ataturk completed the unfinished work of the Young Turks.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

U.S. Says Looking Forward to Minsk Group Role in Karabakh Settlement

42 mins ago
Opposition Vows to Continue Protests Calling for Pashinyan’s Ouster

Ruling Party to Oust Opposition Leaders from Parliament Posts

46 mins ago

Connect with us

  • About
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

© 2021 Asbarez | All Rights Reserved | Powered By MSDN Solutions Inc.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Top Stories
  • Community
  • Arts & Culture
    • Art
    • Books
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Critics’ Forum
  • Op-Ed
    • Editorial
    • Opinon
    • Letters
  • Columns
    • By Any Means
    • My Turn
    • Three Apples
    • Community Links
    • Critics’ Forum
    • My Name is Armen
    • Living in Armenia
  • Videos
  • Sports

© 2021 Asbarez | All Rights Reserved | Powered By MSDN Solutions Inc.

Accessibility

Accessibility modes

Epilepsy Safe Mode
Dampens color and removes blinks
This mode enables people with epilepsy to use the website safely by eliminating the risk of seizures that result from flashing or blinking animations and risky color combinations.
Visually Impaired Mode
Improves website's visuals
This mode adjusts the website for the convenience of users with visual impairments such as Degrading Eyesight, Tunnel Vision, Cataract, Glaucoma, and others.
Cognitive Disability Mode
Helps to focus on specific content
This mode provides different assistive options to help users with cognitive impairments such as Dyslexia, Autism, CVA, and others, to focus on the essential elements of the website more easily.
ADHD Friendly Mode
Reduces distractions and improve focus
This mode helps users with ADHD and Neurodevelopmental disorders to read, browse, and focus on the main website elements more easily while significantly reducing distractions.
Blindness Mode
Allows using the site with your screen-reader
This mode configures the website to be compatible with screen-readers such as JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver, and TalkBack. A screen-reader is software for blind users that is installed on a computer and smartphone, and websites must be compatible with it.

Online Dictionary

    Readable Experience

    Content Scaling
    Default
    Text Magnifier
    Readable Font
    Dyslexia Friendly
    Highlight Titles
    Highlight Links
    Font Sizing
    Default
    Line Height
    Default
    Letter Spacing
    Default
    Left Aligned
    Center Aligned
    Right Aligned

    Visually Pleasing Experience

    Dark Contrast
    Light Contrast
    Monochrome
    High Contrast
    High Saturation
    Low Saturation
    Adjust Text Colors
    Adjust Title Colors
    Adjust Background Colors

    Easy Orientation

    Mute Sounds
    Hide Images
    Virtual Keyboard
    Reading Guide
    Stop Animations
    Reading Mask
    Highlight Hover
    Highlight Focus
    Big Dark Cursor
    Big Light Cursor
    Navigation Keys

    Asbarez.com Accessibility Statement

    Accessibility Statement

    • asbarez.com
    • June 28, 2022

    Compliance status

    We firmly believe that the internet should be available and accessible to anyone, and are committed to providing a website that is accessible to the widest possible audience, regardless of circumstance and ability.

    To fulfill this, we aim to adhere as strictly as possible to the World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 (WCAG 2.1) at the AA level. These guidelines explain how to make web content accessible to people with a wide array of disabilities. Complying with those guidelines helps us ensure that the website is accessible to all people: blind people, people with motor impairments, visual impairment, cognitive disabilities, and more.

    This website utilizes various technologies that are meant to make it as accessible as possible at all times. We utilize an accessibility interface that allows persons with specific disabilities to adjust the website’s UI (user interface) and design it to their personal needs.

    Additionally, the website utilizes an AI-based application that runs in the background and optimizes its accessibility level constantly. This application remediates the website’s HTML, adapts Its functionality and behavior for screen-readers used by the blind users, and for keyboard functions used by individuals with motor impairments.

    If you’ve found a malfunction or have ideas for improvement, we’ll be happy to hear from you. You can reach out to the website’s operators by using the following email

    Screen-reader and keyboard navigation

    Our website implements the ARIA attributes (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) technique, alongside various different behavioral changes, to ensure blind users visiting with screen-readers are able to read, comprehend, and enjoy the website’s functions. As soon as a user with a screen-reader enters your site, they immediately receive a prompt to enter the Screen-Reader Profile so they can browse and operate your site effectively. Here’s how our website covers some of the most important screen-reader requirements, alongside console screenshots of code examples:

    1. Screen-reader optimization: we run a background process that learns the website’s components from top to bottom, to ensure ongoing compliance even when updating the website. In this process, we provide screen-readers with meaningful data using the ARIA set of attributes. For example, we provide accurate form labels; descriptions for actionable icons (social media icons, search icons, cart icons, etc.); validation guidance for form inputs; element roles such as buttons, menus, modal dialogues (popups), and others. Additionally, the background process scans all of the website’s images and provides an accurate and meaningful image-object-recognition-based description as an ALT (alternate text) tag for images that are not described. It will also extract texts that are embedded within the image, using an OCR (optical character recognition) technology. To turn on screen-reader adjustments at any time, users need only to press the Alt+1 keyboard combination. Screen-reader users also get automatic announcements to turn the Screen-reader mode on as soon as they enter the website.

      These adjustments are compatible with all popular screen readers, including JAWS and NVDA.

    2. Keyboard navigation optimization: The background process also adjusts the website’s HTML, and adds various behaviors using JavaScript code to make the website operable by the keyboard. This includes the ability to navigate the website using the Tab and Shift+Tab keys, operate dropdowns with the arrow keys, close them with Esc, trigger buttons and links using the Enter key, navigate between radio and checkbox elements using the arrow keys, and fill them in with the Spacebar or Enter key.Additionally, keyboard users will find quick-navigation and content-skip menus, available at any time by clicking Alt+1, or as the first elements of the site while navigating with the keyboard. The background process also handles triggered popups by moving the keyboard focus towards them as soon as they appear, and not allow the focus drift outside of it.

      Users can also use shortcuts such as “M” (menus), “H” (headings), “F” (forms), “B” (buttons), and “G” (graphics) to jump to specific elements.

    Disability profiles supported in our website

    • Epilepsy Safe Mode: this profile enables people with epilepsy to use the website safely by eliminating the risk of seizures that result from flashing or blinking animations and risky color combinations.
    • Visually Impaired Mode: this mode adjusts the website for the convenience of users with visual impairments such as Degrading Eyesight, Tunnel Vision, Cataract, Glaucoma, and others.
    • Cognitive Disability Mode: this mode provides different assistive options to help users with cognitive impairments such as Dyslexia, Autism, CVA, and others, to focus on the essential elements of the website more easily.
    • ADHD Friendly Mode: this mode helps users with ADHD and Neurodevelopmental disorders to read, browse, and focus on the main website elements more easily while significantly reducing distractions.
    • Blindness Mode: this mode configures the website to be compatible with screen-readers such as JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver, and TalkBack. A screen-reader is software for blind users that is installed on a computer and smartphone, and websites must be compatible with it.
    • Keyboard Navigation Profile (Motor-Impaired): this profile enables motor-impaired persons to operate the website using the keyboard Tab, Shift+Tab, and the Enter keys. Users can also use shortcuts such as “M” (menus), “H” (headings), “F” (forms), “B” (buttons), and “G” (graphics) to jump to specific elements.

    Additional UI, design, and readability adjustments

    1. Font adjustments – users, can increase and decrease its size, change its family (type), adjust the spacing, alignment, line height, and more.
    2. Color adjustments – users can select various color contrast profiles such as light, dark, inverted, and monochrome. Additionally, users can swap color schemes of titles, texts, and backgrounds, with over 7 different coloring options.
    3. Animations – epileptic users can stop all running animations with the click of a button. Animations controlled by the interface include videos, GIFs, and CSS flashing transitions.
    4. Content highlighting – users can choose to emphasize important elements such as links and titles. They can also choose to highlight focused or hovered elements only.
    5. Audio muting – users with hearing devices may experience headaches or other issues due to automatic audio playing. This option lets users mute the entire website instantly.
    6. Cognitive disorders – we utilize a search engine that is linked to Wikipedia and Wiktionary, allowing people with cognitive disorders to decipher meanings of phrases, initials, slang, and others.
    7. Additional functions – we provide users the option to change cursor color and size, use a printing mode, enable a virtual keyboard, and many other functions.

    Browser and assistive technology compatibility

    We aim to support the widest array of browsers and assistive technologies as possible, so our users can choose the best fitting tools for them, with as few limitations as possible. Therefore, we have worked very hard to be able to support all major systems that comprise over 95% of the user market share including Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Opera and Microsoft Edge, JAWS and NVDA (screen readers), both for Windows and for MAC users.

    Notes, comments, and feedback

    Despite our very best efforts to allow anybody to adjust the website to their needs, there may still be pages or sections that are not fully accessible, are in the process of becoming accessible, or are lacking an adequate technological solution to make them accessible. Still, we are continually improving our accessibility, adding, updating and improving its options and features, and developing and adopting new technologies. All this is meant to reach the optimal level of accessibility, following technological advancements. For any assistance, please reach out to