Tuesday, June 14, 2022
No Result
View All Result
Asbarez.com
NEWSLETTER
ՀԱՅ
  • Home
  • Top Stories
  • Community
  • Arts & Culture
    • Art
    • Books
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Critics’ Forum
  • Op-Ed
    • Editorial
    • Opinon
    • Letters
  • Columns
    • By Any Means
    • My Turn
    • Three Apples
    • Community Links
    • Critics’ Forum
    • My Name is Armen
    • Living in Armenia
  • Videos
  • Sports
  • Home
  • Top Stories
  • Community
  • Arts & Culture
    • Art
    • Books
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Critics’ Forum
  • Op-Ed
    • Editorial
    • Opinon
    • Letters
  • Columns
    • By Any Means
    • My Turn
    • Three Apples
    • Community Links
    • Critics’ Forum
    • My Name is Armen
    • Living in Armenia
  • Videos
  • Sports
No Result
View All Result
Asbarez.com
ՀԱՅ
No Result
View All Result

Why Armenians Should Not Support Russia’s Recognition of Donetsk and Luhansk

by Contributor
February 23, 2022
in Armenia, Commentary, International, Latest, Op-Ed, Top Stories
0
Why Armenians Should Not Support Russia’s Recognition of Donetsk and Luhansk

Donets and Luhansk were recognized by Russia. The West sees it a pre-cursor to an invasion (Getty Images photo)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

BY MISCHA GUREGHIAN HALL

This year has seen the most considerable build-up of armed forces on the European continent since World War II. Officials across the West and within international organizations have sounded the alarm that Europe is the closest to war it has been in 70 years. On Tuesday, Russia took the step to recognize the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and the Luhansk People’s Republic (LPR), regarded by the West as a major provocation and triggering sanctions from the United States, United Kingdom, and European Union.

However, among near-universal condemnation of Russia’s actions, there has been one notable exception—Artsakh’s President Arayik Harutyunyan. Following Russian President Vladimir Putin’s recognition of the two separatist regions of Ukraine as independent states, Harutyunyan praised the move, likening the situations of the DPR and LPR to that of the Republic of Artsakh. Armenians generally may see Artsakh and these separatist regions as parallel cases of unrecognized republics heroically fighting for freedom, in turn supporting Russia’s recognition of Donetsk Luhansk. Yet this is a dangerous position, as identifying the stark factual and legal differences between the situations is integral to the continued pursuit of recognition for the Republic of Artsakh.

Our cases for independence are not the same.

Self-determination has two recognized avenues—internal and external. Internal self-determination refers to peoples’ interactions with domestic systems to exert their political will. This includes voting, protesting, civil disobedience, and running for office. External self-determination, also known as remedial secession, refers to a people separating from their host nation as means of exercising their self-determination. Artsakh’s declaration of independence is an example of remedial secession, in this case from Azerbaijan. The right to external self-determination, however, is not absolute. Courts have dealt with the issue of secession three notable times in history.

In 1920 a League of Nations legal committee ruled on the secession of the Aland Islands from Finland; in 1998, the Canadian Supreme Court ruled on the independence claims of Quebec; and in 2010, the International Court of Justice—the same tribunal hearing the ongoing Armenia v. Azerbaijan case—opined on the validity of Kosovo’s declaration of independence. These three cases have established three legal criteria for an unrecognized state to separate from another state—such as in the cases of Artsakh, the DPR, and the LPR.

Firstly, the group seeking independence must be a “people” in an ethno-geographic sense. In the Åland Islands case, the committee of jurists found the right to remedial secession to exist for peoples bound by “old traditions” or “a common language and civilization.” In this case, the committee found that political and national affiliations are not constitutive of a “people.” Therefore, a minority group characterized by such factors does not innately possess the actionable right to external self-determination. The second criterion is that the group in question must have been subjected to gross human rights violations. In the case of Quebec, the Supreme Court of Canada cited colonialist rule, military occupation, and denial of political participation as qualifying violations.

The International Court of Justice was less specific in its Kosovo decision, citing “alien subjugation, domination and exploitation” as predicates for remedial secession. The second criterion is closely linked to the third, which states that all other means for the group to exercise self-determination within the domestic political-legal framework of the subjugator nation have been exhausted. In the Åalan Island cases, the committee identified secession as only “a last resort.” The Canadian Supreme Court agreed, reserving secession only for cases in which a group has been “denied the ability to exert internally their right to self determination.”

However, the International Court of Justice affirmed, in its Kosovo opinion, a fundamental rule of international law that a new nation cannot be created through the use of aggressive force or the violation of peremptory norms of international law. The secessions of Donetsk and Luhansk blatantly fail this simple test and, perhaps more consequentially, do not satisfy any of the adobe three criteria. The illegality of waging of aggressive war, that is, the use of force in violation of another nation’s sovereignty, is perhaps the most explicit prohibition contained in the United Nations Charter. Moreover, the Nuremberg Tribunal—which tried Nazi war crimes, aggression, and crimes against humanity after the Second World War—recognized aggressive war as the “supreme international crime.” Russia’s deployment of military forces within the DPR and LPR under the guise of peacekeeping is a clear and present violation of Ukraine’s territorial sovereignty and an aggressive attempt to change international boundaries through the use of force. The DPR and LPR’s claims to independence cannot be seen outside the context of Russian imperialism and the desire to influence Ukraine’s political autonomy.

The people of the DPR and LPR are not distinct ethnic groups as demanded by the first criterion for legitimate remedial secession—they are politically pro-Russian separatists. Their claims for independence do not lie in demands of self-determination from a cultural minority, but in a desire to shun the West and politically drift towards Russia. Moreover, irregular military elements fighting for DPR and LPR are not so much freedom fighters as they are Russian proxies. Since at least 2014, it has also been widely recognized that Russian special forces are directly fighting for the DPR and LPR on the ground. The separatists are fighting less for the ideals of independence and self-determination than they are for Russian influence over the regions. This is further evidenced by Putin’s declaration, in conjunction with his recognition of the DPR and LPR, that all the territories of the pre-1918 Russian Empire are the rightful lands of the present Russian Federation. The people of the two regions never even declared what they want their borders to be, as acknowledged by the Kremlin’s press secretary in a recent interview with Bloomberg. President Putin recognized borders of Russia’s choice, driven by geopolitical ambitions of territory acquisition, not the self-determination of peoples.

The second criterion, however, would likely be satisfied, however, with important caveats. The human rights situation in Donetsk and Luhansk are generally abhorrent and may be seen as qualifying the second criterion. UN agencies and NGOs have widely and credibly reported atrocities committed by both sides. However, just as false equivalency is often drawn in Artsakh, holding pro-Ukrainian and pro-Russian forces as equals in terms of humanitarian violations is a fallacy. Russia and its proxy forces have committed alleged war crimes as part of a broader incursion into Ukraine to seize territory. While Ukrainian forces also have, for their part, likely violated the laws of war, the preeminent crimes of the aggressors, that is, the violation of sovereignty by force, are of an inexorably higher character.

Recalling the nature of the conflict, dissident political groups do not possess the legal right to succeed on the basis of differing desires of internal governance. Pro-Russian separatists lament Ukraine’s drift towards NATO and the West; however, disagreements over the direction of a nation are a common if not necessary feature of a healthy democracy. Democratic institutions of governance are the ultimate tools of self-determination, as they allow for a group’s voice to be heard within their national government. If every political minority group that disagreed, even fundamentally, with the direction a country is going, cannot possess the right to secession. A new ‘people’s republic’ would emerge every hour if this were the case. Democracy provides the population an avenue to air their grievances and seek change. Pro-Russian separatists have abandoned internal self-determination and democracy, instead turning to the use of force as a first rather than last option. As such, the third criteria is definitively unsatisfied.

On the other hand, the strength of Artsakh’s case for independence lies in its satisfaction with the above-enumerated criteria. The people of Artsakh are undeniably a distinct ethnic Armenian minority within Azerbaijan, satisfying the first criterion. The history of the region since at least 1920 provides a well-documented history of atrocities committed by Azerbaijan against the population of Artsakh and on Armenians living elsewhere in the country. More recently, this record has been confirmed by the European Court of Human Rights in a number of cases, satisfying the second criterion. Lastly, over the past thirty years, all avenues for a peaceful resolution of the Artsakh conflict have been exhausted and generally confounded by Azerbaijan’s disengagement from the Minsk Group mediation process. Azerbaijan has, moreover, demonstrated an unwillingness to comply with ceasefire agreements or the principles of a peaceful conflict settlement. Avenues for internal self-determination within the legal structure of Azerbiajni law have failed the people of Artsakh; the third criterion is satisfied.

Possessing such a strong case for lawful secession as prescribed by international law, it is a grave mistake for Armenian officials to depart from this accepted legal structure. The Armenian people can never hope for an internationally recognized Artsakh without defending the legal validity of Artsakh statehood under international legal precepts. The three-point criteria are the best—and likely all—we have to argue for Artsakh’s right to self-determination effectively, and publicly recognizing republics claiming independence while not conforming to these criteria effectively dismisses the validity of the criteria altogether. Yet, in a legal world where these criteria have no legal weight, Artsakh holds no hope of legitimate recognition. Many Armenians may hope that we can legitimize Artsakh through the continued defense of its lands by brave young soldiers. As noble as this may be, it is no path to Artsakh’s recognition as a sovereign nation.

The only course the Armenian people have is engaging with relevant international norms. If we simply throw these norms aside in the interest of supporting separatist states which we believe share parallel destinies to ours, we surrender any hope of achieving what we have long fought for—a free and independent Armenian Artsakh.

Mischa Gureghian Hall is a freshman at UCLA, majoring in Global Studies.

Contributor

Contributor

Next Post
Vartanants…What Are We Celebrating?

Vartanants…What Are We Celebrating?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Shahumian’s De-Occupation Remains a Priority for Artsakh

Shahumian’s De-Occupation Remains a Priority for Artsakh

11 hours ago

Board of Regents Condemns Attacks on Armenian Schools’ Integrity, Commitment to Homeland

11 hours ago

Connect with us

  • About
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

© 2021 Asbarez | All Rights Reserved | Powered By MSDN Solutions Inc.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Top Stories
  • Community
  • Arts & Culture
    • Art
    • Books
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Critics’ Forum
  • Op-Ed
    • Editorial
    • Opinon
    • Letters
  • Columns
    • By Any Means
    • My Turn
    • Three Apples
    • Community Links
    • Critics’ Forum
    • My Name is Armen
    • Living in Armenia
  • Videos
  • Sports

© 2021 Asbarez | All Rights Reserved | Powered By MSDN Solutions Inc.

Accessibility

Accessibility modes

Epilepsy Safe Mode
Dampens color and removes blinks
This mode enables people with epilepsy to use the website safely by eliminating the risk of seizures that result from flashing or blinking animations and risky color combinations.
Visually Impaired Mode
Improves website's visuals
This mode adjusts the website for the convenience of users with visual impairments such as Degrading Eyesight, Tunnel Vision, Cataract, Glaucoma, and others.
Cognitive Disability Mode
Helps to focus on specific content
This mode provides different assistive options to help users with cognitive impairments such as Dyslexia, Autism, CVA, and others, to focus on the essential elements of the website more easily.
ADHD Friendly Mode
Reduces distractions and improve focus
This mode helps users with ADHD and Neurodevelopmental disorders to read, browse, and focus on the main website elements more easily while significantly reducing distractions.
Blindness Mode
Allows using the site with your screen-reader
This mode configures the website to be compatible with screen-readers such as JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver, and TalkBack. A screen-reader is software for blind users that is installed on a computer and smartphone, and websites must be compatible with it.

Online Dictionary

    Readable Experience

    Content Scaling
    Default
    Text Magnifier
    Readable Font
    Dyslexia Friendly
    Highlight Titles
    Highlight Links
    Font Sizing
    Default
    Line Height
    Default
    Letter Spacing
    Default
    Left Aligned
    Center Aligned
    Right Aligned

    Visually Pleasing Experience

    Dark Contrast
    Light Contrast
    Monochrome
    High Contrast
    High Saturation
    Low Saturation
    Adjust Text Colors
    Adjust Title Colors
    Adjust Background Colors

    Easy Orientation

    Mute Sounds
    Hide Images
    Virtual Keyboard
    Reading Guide
    Stop Animations
    Reading Mask
    Highlight Hover
    Highlight Focus
    Big Dark Cursor
    Big Light Cursor
    Navigation Keys

    Asbarez.com Accessibility Statement

    Accessibility Statement

    • asbarez.com
    • June 14, 2022

    Compliance status

    We firmly believe that the internet should be available and accessible to anyone, and are committed to providing a website that is accessible to the widest possible audience, regardless of circumstance and ability.

    To fulfill this, we aim to adhere as strictly as possible to the World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 (WCAG 2.1) at the AA level. These guidelines explain how to make web content accessible to people with a wide array of disabilities. Complying with those guidelines helps us ensure that the website is accessible to all people: blind people, people with motor impairments, visual impairment, cognitive disabilities, and more.

    This website utilizes various technologies that are meant to make it as accessible as possible at all times. We utilize an accessibility interface that allows persons with specific disabilities to adjust the website’s UI (user interface) and design it to their personal needs.

    Additionally, the website utilizes an AI-based application that runs in the background and optimizes its accessibility level constantly. This application remediates the website’s HTML, adapts Its functionality and behavior for screen-readers used by the blind users, and for keyboard functions used by individuals with motor impairments.

    If you’ve found a malfunction or have ideas for improvement, we’ll be happy to hear from you. You can reach out to the website’s operators by using the following email

    Screen-reader and keyboard navigation

    Our website implements the ARIA attributes (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) technique, alongside various different behavioral changes, to ensure blind users visiting with screen-readers are able to read, comprehend, and enjoy the website’s functions. As soon as a user with a screen-reader enters your site, they immediately receive a prompt to enter the Screen-Reader Profile so they can browse and operate your site effectively. Here’s how our website covers some of the most important screen-reader requirements, alongside console screenshots of code examples:

    1. Screen-reader optimization: we run a background process that learns the website’s components from top to bottom, to ensure ongoing compliance even when updating the website. In this process, we provide screen-readers with meaningful data using the ARIA set of attributes. For example, we provide accurate form labels; descriptions for actionable icons (social media icons, search icons, cart icons, etc.); validation guidance for form inputs; element roles such as buttons, menus, modal dialogues (popups), and others. Additionally, the background process scans all of the website’s images and provides an accurate and meaningful image-object-recognition-based description as an ALT (alternate text) tag for images that are not described. It will also extract texts that are embedded within the image, using an OCR (optical character recognition) technology. To turn on screen-reader adjustments at any time, users need only to press the Alt+1 keyboard combination. Screen-reader users also get automatic announcements to turn the Screen-reader mode on as soon as they enter the website.

      These adjustments are compatible with all popular screen readers, including JAWS and NVDA.

    2. Keyboard navigation optimization: The background process also adjusts the website’s HTML, and adds various behaviors using JavaScript code to make the website operable by the keyboard. This includes the ability to navigate the website using the Tab and Shift+Tab keys, operate dropdowns with the arrow keys, close them with Esc, trigger buttons and links using the Enter key, navigate between radio and checkbox elements using the arrow keys, and fill them in with the Spacebar or Enter key.Additionally, keyboard users will find quick-navigation and content-skip menus, available at any time by clicking Alt+1, or as the first elements of the site while navigating with the keyboard. The background process also handles triggered popups by moving the keyboard focus towards them as soon as they appear, and not allow the focus drift outside of it.

      Users can also use shortcuts such as “M” (menus), “H” (headings), “F” (forms), “B” (buttons), and “G” (graphics) to jump to specific elements.

    Disability profiles supported in our website

    • Epilepsy Safe Mode: this profile enables people with epilepsy to use the website safely by eliminating the risk of seizures that result from flashing or blinking animations and risky color combinations.
    • Visually Impaired Mode: this mode adjusts the website for the convenience of users with visual impairments such as Degrading Eyesight, Tunnel Vision, Cataract, Glaucoma, and others.
    • Cognitive Disability Mode: this mode provides different assistive options to help users with cognitive impairments such as Dyslexia, Autism, CVA, and others, to focus on the essential elements of the website more easily.
    • ADHD Friendly Mode: this mode helps users with ADHD and Neurodevelopmental disorders to read, browse, and focus on the main website elements more easily while significantly reducing distractions.
    • Blindness Mode: this mode configures the website to be compatible with screen-readers such as JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver, and TalkBack. A screen-reader is software for blind users that is installed on a computer and smartphone, and websites must be compatible with it.
    • Keyboard Navigation Profile (Motor-Impaired): this profile enables motor-impaired persons to operate the website using the keyboard Tab, Shift+Tab, and the Enter keys. Users can also use shortcuts such as “M” (menus), “H” (headings), “F” (forms), “B” (buttons), and “G” (graphics) to jump to specific elements.

    Additional UI, design, and readability adjustments

    1. Font adjustments – users, can increase and decrease its size, change its family (type), adjust the spacing, alignment, line height, and more.
    2. Color adjustments – users can select various color contrast profiles such as light, dark, inverted, and monochrome. Additionally, users can swap color schemes of titles, texts, and backgrounds, with over 7 different coloring options.
    3. Animations – epileptic users can stop all running animations with the click of a button. Animations controlled by the interface include videos, GIFs, and CSS flashing transitions.
    4. Content highlighting – users can choose to emphasize important elements such as links and titles. They can also choose to highlight focused or hovered elements only.
    5. Audio muting – users with hearing devices may experience headaches or other issues due to automatic audio playing. This option lets users mute the entire website instantly.
    6. Cognitive disorders – we utilize a search engine that is linked to Wikipedia and Wiktionary, allowing people with cognitive disorders to decipher meanings of phrases, initials, slang, and others.
    7. Additional functions – we provide users the option to change cursor color and size, use a printing mode, enable a virtual keyboard, and many other functions.

    Browser and assistive technology compatibility

    We aim to support the widest array of browsers and assistive technologies as possible, so our users can choose the best fitting tools for them, with as few limitations as possible. Therefore, we have worked very hard to be able to support all major systems that comprise over 95% of the user market share including Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Opera and Microsoft Edge, JAWS and NVDA (screen readers), both for Windows and for MAC users.

    Notes, comments, and feedback

    Despite our very best efforts to allow anybody to adjust the website to their needs, there may still be pages or sections that are not fully accessible, are in the process of becoming accessible, or are lacking an adequate technological solution to make them accessible. Still, we are continually improving our accessibility, adding, updating and improving its options and features, and developing and adopting new technologies. All this is meant to reach the optimal level of accessibility, following technological advancements. For any assistance, please reach out to